Crunk Times, My friend.....Crunk Times

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

flip, you are hilarious

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

Dev, I guess you really are ignoring me. You did not even take the bait when I casually referred to you as a sociopath earlier.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

im not reading all those long *** posts. haha. show me? I probly wouldnt have responded anyway

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

Flip, you are going to be a very frustrated man if you continue to try to make sense out of women and relationships with women. Trust me, most simply do not think like us. You do what you have to and you retain as much of your self as you can. Sometimes it is worth it just to give in and other times it is worth it to say "fVck that."
People like Dev are happier because they can sociopaths and are very adept at convincing women that they want what he wants them to want.

they can sociopaths?

I has a crayon?

no gym for home?

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

they can sociopaths?

I has a crayon?

no gym for home?

lol, please replace "can" with "are."

 

[hoss 5,000+ posts]

al bundy pwns.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

Indeed, I think he may even be > gahndi

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

lol, please replace "can" with "are."

sure, i have sociopathic tendencies I guess, symptoms or whatever. But im not really a sociopath. hahaha. Well maybe I am, its not really that bad.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

So far I am A A B C in my classes..... C is in the american govt online class.

 

[hoss 5,000+ posts]

Indeed, I think he may even be > gahndi

it is entirely possible.

i am now considering the theory that you and Iamdeman are the same person //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[mokedaddy 5,000+ posts]

Initially, I was shooting for a neither party compromise. I don't ask her to do things she doesn't want and she doesn't ask me to do things I don't want.
This autarky situation, while feasable does not create higher potential gains. When each person does something they do not want in exchange for another person doing what they don't want, both parties are actually better off.

In my example, I cited an activity I don't like and an activity she doesn't like. While it is possible to survive with no compromise; it is rather stale and stagnant and limits opportunities for growth. When the people come together to trade these "dislikes", both parties are better off.

I highly value activity X and she highly values me assisting with activties A and B. The enjoyment/entertainment/etc I recieve from activity X is greater than the cost/frustration/etc I "pay" for activities A and B. And the cost/frustration/discomfort she "pays" for X is less than the enjoyment she recieves from me producing A & B. It's a simple marginal cost function to determine how many units of A&B equals a unit of X.

See how both partiers are better off my conceding??

The problem comes in enforcing the math. If the math says 5A + 5B = 1X, it doesn't translate to real life, and I realize that. But at what point does disequilibrium cause problems? I am not sure. I do know that explaining this to teh gf was not as fruitful as I anticipated.

Man Flip I am almost at a loss that you didnt think this would cause problems. Women dont want fair. They dont care what you want unless its what they want. They will put up with your stuff but you are expected to show enthusiasm over things they want.

Only you can decide when the disequilibrium causes problems as you so eloquently put it. There is no right or wrong. Its what you as a person feel comfortable with and how much you are willing to give up to be with said person.

Its just how it is man.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

it is entirely possible.
i am now considering the theory that you and Iamdeman are the same person //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

wsw? does have a lot of names, you might be right.

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

Initially, I was shooting for a neither party compromise. I don't ask her to do things she doesn't want and she doesn't ask me to do things I don't want.
This autarky situation, while feasable does not create higher potential gains. When each person does something they do not want in exchange for another person doing what they don't want, both parties are actually better off.

In my example, I cited an activity I don't like and an activity she doesn't like. While it is possible to survive with no compromise; it is rather stale and stagnant and limits opportunities for growth. When the people come together to trade these "dislikes", both parties are better off.

I highly value activity X and she highly values me assisting with activties A and B. The enjoyment/entertainment/etc I recieve from activity X is greater than the cost/frustration/etc I "pay" for activities A and B. And the cost/frustration/discomfort she "pays" for X is less than the enjoyment she recieves from me producing A & B. It's a simple marginal cost function to determine how many units of A&B equals a unit of X.

See how both partiers are better off my conceding??

The problem comes in enforcing the math. If the math says 5A + 5B = 1X, it doesn't translate to real life, and I realize that. But at what point does disequilibrium cause problems? I am not sure. I do know that explaining this to teh gf was not as fruitful as I anticipated.

Sadly, I do understand...even in this pitiful scenario.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

Initially, I was shooting for a neither party compromise. I don't ask her to do things she doesn't want and she doesn't ask me to do things I don't want.
This autarky situation, while feasable does not create higher potential gains. When each person does something they do not want in exchange for another person doing what they don't want, both parties are actually better off.

In my example, I cited an activity I don't like and an activity she doesn't like. While it is possible to survive with no compromise; it is rather stale and stagnant and limits opportunities for growth. When the people come together to trade these "dislikes", both parties are better off.

I highly value activity X and she highly values me assisting with activties A and B. The enjoyment/entertainment/etc I recieve from activity X is greater than the cost/frustration/etc I "pay" for activities A and B. And the cost/frustration/discomfort she "pays" for X is less than the enjoyment she recieves from me producing A & B. It's a simple marginal cost function to determine how many units of A&B equals a unit of X.

See how both partiers are better off my conceding??

The problem comes in enforcing the math. If the math says 5A + 5B = 1X, it doesn't translate to real life, and I realize that. But at what point does disequilibrium cause problems? I am not sure. I do know that explaining this to teh gf was not as fruitful as I anticipated.

just break up with her.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

sure, i have sociopathic tendencies I guess, symptoms or whatever. But im not really a sociopath. hahaha. Well maybe I am, its not really that bad.

eh, I was just trying to get a reaction. I did the same the other day with similar results. You are no fun at all. I will just go back to mocking Flip and his clown fish.