tRiGgEr
5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Crown amps = racist:fyi:wow you got mad at them for not reading what you posted...and called them on it...so when i did it it was so wrong eh
Crown amps = racist:fyi:wow you got mad at them for not reading what you posted...and called them on it...so when i did it it was so wrong eh
So, then you agree the article is about cone mass and NOT size, So why use it in this debate when it doesn't take into account cone size or the fact that he's in a car?No it dealt with driver mass.
How bout you read what you post. Then decide who needs to "STFU" as you so elegantly posted.
A 10" driver is going to have less moving mass than a 15" driver. Read the artical.
I'm running a 10 by the way:naughty:but don't nut in your pants evertime someone wants to get a smaller sized sub.
Enlighten me, since you obviously have supreme knowledge of physics and speaker design.If you don't get it it's fine.
I don't think anybody here is trying to convince anyone else that they have obtained supreme knowledge of physics and speaker design. I know I'm not atleast.Enlighten me, since you obviously have supreme knowledge of physics and speaker design. inductance effects transient response more than cone mass. Thats great, but its not the end-all argument concerning cone size.
I see increased cone size as being a positive instead of a negative. You get more low bass output potential, with reduced distortion. And all of this comes with more efficiency when compared to a similiar driver with a smaller cone. I fail to see what you think is the draw back of large size drivers when emplimented properly.So, then you agree the article is about cone mass and NOT size, So why use it in this debate when it doesn't take into account cone size or the fact that he's in a car?Sure there are some acceptions, but don't nut in your pants evertime someone wants to get a smaller sized sub.
negatives of large cone size - cone flex, air resistance, weight, and enclosure size. Not all people are shooting for the absolute loudest at the lowest frequency, especially people that listen to music other than rap. There are tons of exceptions, but generally I think a smaller sub would work much better in this application.I see increased cone size as being a positive instead of a negative. You get more low bass output potential, with reduced distortion. And all of this comes with more efficiency when compared to a similiar driver with a smaller cone. I fail to see what you think is the draw back of large size drivers when emplimented properly.
negatives of large cone size - cone flex, air resistance, weight, and enclosure size. Not all people are shooting for the absolute loudest at the lowest frequency, especially people that listen to music other than rap. There are tons of exceptions, but generally I think a smaller sub would work much better in this application.
BTW I run a 15" atlas, and it sounds like *** for metal.
this guys a tool. I gave up long ago...