Crsracing
CarAudio.com Newbie
First of all I know rear fill is controversial but this is going in a jeep that is often used off road with rear passengers. 2nd it is often used as the "camp stereo" so additional speakers are a plus.
So awhile back I bought all alpine stuff to freshen up the stereo in my jeep pdx v9, 6.5 type r components, 6.5 coaxials, and a type r 10" sub. Recently I have been researching about going active in my car and was thinking that the v9 has good enough crossovers to run my components active. Which the way a lot of people talk if I do my car I'll want to do my jeep that way to. But then I lose my channels for the rear, but I have an alpine power pack laying around. So if I bridged it and fed it decent power (not just tapped in the stereo harness like intended) would it be sufficient ? Or better yet would that set up sound better then everything fed off the v9 with the passive crossovers.
On a side note is there a down side to crossovers that just filter the tweeter and send full signal to the woofer? Like the type r ones do
So awhile back I bought all alpine stuff to freshen up the stereo in my jeep pdx v9, 6.5 type r components, 6.5 coaxials, and a type r 10" sub. Recently I have been researching about going active in my car and was thinking that the v9 has good enough crossovers to run my components active. Which the way a lot of people talk if I do my car I'll want to do my jeep that way to. But then I lose my channels for the rear, but I have an alpine power pack laying around. So if I bridged it and fed it decent power (not just tapped in the stereo harness like intended) would it be sufficient ? Or better yet would that set up sound better then everything fed off the v9 with the passive crossovers.
On a side note is there a down side to crossovers that just filter the tweeter and send full signal to the woofer? Like the type r ones do
