Sidebar

Search results

  1. R

    Winners only.

    You're saying that I post a screen cap that proves I am lying? How would that make ANY sense? Anyone who looks at it would immediately be able to call me out on it. Think about that along with the fact that every single time you accused me of altering your words, I have asked for proof of your...
  2. R

    Winners only.

    That makes no sense. Lemme guess, you think I Photoshop the screen caps? Without the memory, how would I know what to search for? Try to think about that for a minute. Hmm, is it because I don't think information should be censored and controlled by the government? Or is it because I ask...
  3. R

    Winners only.

    'Seems it would be more an issue of allowing them to even BE instituted. I am a full proponent of the right to bear arms, but I also accept that like many other rights, there can and should be restrictions on how they are exercised. "After the details of Aldrich’s previous arrest was revealed...
  4. R

    Winners only.

    Hmmm, it seems as if you were the one attempting to belittle people who went to a school where they taught the full spectrum of history, including WWII and the people involved. Something about a "real school" not having it in the curriculum, perhaps?
  5. R

    Winners only.

    Who was doing that? Got an example, or just another of your baseless claims that you can’t back up? That’s a tactic right from the Thx playbook. I expected more of you.
  6. R

    Winners only.

    You think a screen snip of your post is “saying completely different things” from what you posted? Or are you suggesting you never advocated for government censorship of info and I just made that whole premise up? (Not rhetorical questions. Go ahead and answer) Sure do. That’s why I can...
  7. R

    Winners only.

    Pretty weak considering the depth of knowledge shown about by two other people here, who also learned about it in school. I do like how you tight-wingers try to make education seem like a bad thing, though. Great tactic for trying to maintain control of the masses. The less they know, the...
  8. R

    Winners only.

    You think quoting your posts is a “lie”. Pretty wild thought process there. Your semantics game is weak. You think the information should not be shared. You said so. Whether it is due to your decision of relevance, or whether you demand there be a “need” doesn’t change your desire for...
  9. R

    Winners only.

    So we should withhold facts and information from jurors in order to help them make a better decision? “We have video footage of the defendant committing a crime, but we’re not going to let you see it because it might taint your decision making process”. THAT would be handy.
  10. R

    Winners only.

    Be careful, Spokey will start claiming that you goosestep around your neighborhood in Jack boots yelling “sieg heil!”, and holding the book over your head. He can’t imagine any educational setting where students would be exposed to such a book as Mein Kampf.
  11. R

    Winners only.

    Do you act like a petulant child only when you are drinking heavily, or is it all the time? Or are you drinking heavily all the time?
  12. R

    Winners only.

    So like Jimi said, your personal feelings on what information should be censored or not is the way we are all supposed to live. What other decisions do you think you should make for society? What other controls do you fry we should all be subjected to?
  13. R

    Winners only.

    It's in your answer to my very direct question: You don't need to read it even if it is part of the lesson plan, discussion, and testing, because you know "why he rose the to power".
  14. R

    Winners only.

    You said you WOULDN'T, because you knew what you needed to know.
  15. R

    Winners only.

    Quite the flex to say you would refuse to do your schoolwork because you already are smart enough. And then know nothing of the topic when it comes up. At least you're not as bad as Thx who claimed "extensive" study of anatomy, but didn't know a very simple fact about it, and still insists the...
  16. R

    Winners only.

    Ohhhh YOU said the information was complete. YOU are the overseer who determines what information is complete enough to make a news report. Got it. No censorship, just Thxone deciding what is or is not appropriate information to be included in a news report. You think it's "fluff" to know if...
  17. R

    Winners only.

    Censorship is exactly what you demand when you say the info should be held by a certain party until a special request is made to get it, and a "need" accompanies that request. censorship - the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information And your example is FAR from...
  18. R

    Winners only.

    This has nothing to do with your presumption that if Mein Kampf was included as part of a WWII curriculum in history class, that it should have just been ignored. If it had been part of any history lessons you took in school, would you have simply disregarded it and said "I know why Hitler rose...
  19. R

    Winners only.

    Lie about WHAT exactly? You keep claiming I lie, and then can't provide anything to back up your claim. That would make YOU the liar. YOU declared that the sexual identity of a criminal should not be shared with the public via the media unless the media obtains the information through some...
  20. R

    Winners only.

    I'm not sure what pride has to do with having gone to school and learned what they taught. Do you consider education a bad thing? What other topics should I have ignored when they were part of the lesson plan?
  21. R

    Winners only.

    So if it was part of the lesson plan, discussion, and testing, you would just ignore it and say "I didn't need to know because I know why Hitler rose to power?"
  22. R

    Winners only.

    If you think ANY information about a crime should be withheld and available through a FOIA request (or other means other than full public access) AT ALL, then you are advocating for the censorship and control of the info. It is an irrefutable fact that you stated information should be...
  23. R

    Winners only.

    You think discussing HOW the information that he wants to have controlled, be controlled, is "extreme"? You DO realize that ideas such as his have far-reaching implications, yes? It's much like the moron who says "We should just end welfare tomorrow. Tell people to get a job." A statement like...
  24. R

    Winners only.

    It's interesting that their military leaders would allow them to have non-military patches on their uniform, especially patches that are generally recognized for what Hitler turned the symbol into. I wonder what would happen if US soldiers sewed confederate flags onto their combat gear?
  25. R

    Winners only.

    The fact that you think it should be available by request only suggests that the information is in some way controlled by an entity of authority. What entity do you think should be in control of information regarding a criminal? If a news agency obtains that information only via a demonstrated...
  26. R

    Winners only.

    "It's just not important for the general public to know. If it is really that important that you just NEED to know then you should be able to get that information through a FOIA request." Your words. Quoted verbatim. Not edited. Not enhanced. Not adjusted. Maybe you didn't understand FOIA at the...
  27. R

    Winners only.

    It’s easy to prove your opinions wrong when the opinion is contrary to verifiable fact. You have an opinion that information that must be obtained by a FOIA request is not locked down by the agency holding that info. Patently incorrect opinion. If it must be requested, it is not “public”, and...
  28. R

    Winners only.

    As usual. You are proved wrong and given an opportunity to learn. Suddenly the topic bores you. Funny how that works. And still refusing to answer or even acknowledge questions pertinent to the CONVERSATION.
  29. R

    Winners only.

    Please quote the post where I said that. Please quote the post where I inferred that. Please quote the post that made you think I said it or inferred it. I’ll wait.
  30. R

    Winners only.

    It’s one of his contradictions, like homosexuality being a choice, but heterosexuality being mandatory. He wants the information to be locked down by SOME entity, but wants to call it “public” at the same time.
  31. R

    Winners only.

    The fact that you don’t rip a sheet of lined paper out of your 3rd grade notebook and wrote in crayon ”I’d like the SEC documents pleze”. It’s a specific form that does not have substitutions. My comprehension skills are awesome. More than once, you have demonstrated your communication skills...
  32. R

    Winners only.

    It’s a special request, made in writing, udon a special form, to get information that has not been made public. You don’t just walk into a federal office and say “I’d like the file, please”. It is 100% NOT the same as you having a piece of info and me asking you for it. Go read up on the...
  33. R

    Winners only.

    If you are saying a FOIA request is a way to get the info, then you are saying by default the info is to be inaccessible WITHOUT the special request. Do you REALLY not understand this yet? You can’t just go and look up this stuff at a library, or log onto a website, or “go down and get it”. IT...
  34. R

    Winners only.

    Stop trying to tap dance around. Here’s the direct answer to your question. The same answer I gave in the previous post: “The news doesn’t need to tell us ANYTHING. It’s a private industry, and they get to tell us as little or as much of the story as they want.” The question I answered:”Rob...
  35. R

    Winners only.

    I already knew you were wrong. I provide the definitions because you would undoubtedly say I was making it up if I used my own words to explain things. For fvck sake, you’ve even gone as far as saying the dictionary definitions are wrong. The news doesn’t need to tell us ANYTHING. It’s a...
  36. R

    Winners only.

    OK, so you really are clueless about this topic. FOIA is not information. It is the Freedom Of Information Act. An “act” is also known as a law. This particular law allows for the request by Joe Citizen of information being held/controlled by FEDERAL agencies. This LAW carries no weight for...
  37. R

    Winners only.

    Why do you deny your own words, and literally challenge me to prove you wrong over and over again? You suggested information having to be obtained through a FOIA request. Specifically, information about someone who committed a crime. “ It's just not important for the general public to know. If...
  38. R

    Winners only.

    That is very much NOT what you said, but if you don’t want to stand behind your own words, so be it. But remember: Denying what you said when it’s tight on the thread got all to see makes you look quite foolish. And, are these anger flare ups associated with drinking? They remind me of my old...
  39. R

    Winners only.

    Yet you are still advocating “means if obtaining”, which suggests it is not readily available or allowed to be freely disseminated. ‘Can’t be locked down but also free. Sorry. I think maybe you have difficulty comprehending the conversation, then just blurt stuff out that you don’t understand...
  40. R

    Winners only.

    “It's not about censoring anything or not being transparent. It's just not important for the general public to know. If it is really that important that you just NEED to know then you should be able to get that information through a FOIA request.” Here is your proof. Your own words. If info is...

Latest threads

35D6930B-4E98-475B-99D1-6BC57006BB2F.png
IMG_4923.jpeg
IMG_4923.jpeg
20230318_193317.jpg
Screenshot_20230604-143812.png
20230320_142838.jpg
0604231153a_HDR.jpg
IMG_20230531_114918589.jpg
IMG_20230531_114912392.jpg
0.jpg
RMS.png
1.jpg
3.jpg
rockville.jpg
Screenshot_20230530-071216.png
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh