Current events discussion

Because it's coming from the president. Republicans have long made the excuse of "state's rights" when it comes to overruling federal law. Whether state prosecutors decide to go hard against BLM rioters is state discretion. As I stated, it's not as though Walz, Newsome, or Bass were personally telling state prosecutors to drop the cases. What Trump did by pardoning January 6th rioters....wiping the slate clean....is entirely different. And it's not just that he gave pardons.....he gave BLANKET PARDONS. To ALL OF THEM. To the ones on video assaulting capitol police. Can you imagine the hissy fit that republicans would throw if Walz, Newsome, or Bass would have pardoned a BLM rioter who was on video assaulting police officers?

My entire point is that there's a major double standard going on here.
What you're calling a major double standard doesn't look all that major to me. As I said, the J6ers got it worse than the BLM rioters and I'd argue the BLM rioters did worse. I don't see how not or soft prosecuting is any better than pardoning people. The left just found a more effective way to accomplish what Trump did.
It hasn't yet. This guy is arguing that they discovered his child **** while investigating him for his role in the riot. The same rationale that several other rioters have used to get subsequent, but related charges dropped. My point is that there is no rational excuse for a blanket pardon. Trump didn't pardon people that may have gotten a raw deal. He pardoned everyone. Including the ones doing some pretty despicable things. Hard to sit on the high horse of 'law and order' when it's openly disregarded by Dopey Don. Hell....just over the past couple weeks he went on a pardoning spree of people who families paid him. It's all gotten too ridiculous to believe.
What rioters have gotten unrelated charges dropped due to a pardon? A pardon doesn't erase the crime, it only reduces the sentence, therefore the search would still be legal. Are there actual examples that contradict that.

I don't approve of blanket pardons anymore than I approve of not prosecuting/punishing the BLM rioters. It was certainly hypocritical of the left to go hard for the J6ers while playing patty cake with the BLM rioters.
 
When you said we shoulkd eny people the right of due process, THAT is a statement that we shouldn't follow the COTUS

You may not think it, but the SCOTUS has confirmed the protection of the rights of ilelgals on our soil:
Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206, 212 (1953); see also Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976) (There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.); Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 215 (1982) (holding that unlawfully present aliens were entitled to both due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment).

Humans are born with rights. Rights are not something that are granted or given.
We all have them.

So you don't even know what Trump was referencing, yet you are "pretty damn sure" of what you and the rest of the people who parroted Trump meant when you all repeated the nickname?
Interesting.




I admit I had never heard the Snoreleone one, and it gave me a chuckle.
Ahhhh so **** it... tear down the wall, remove all ports of entry into the US and let's just do like Biden and let everyone in. **** it.
 
What you're calling a major double standard doesn't look all that major to me. As I said, the J6ers got it worse than the BLM rioters and I'd argue the BLM rioters did worse. I don't see how not or soft prosecuting is any better than pardoning people. The left just found a more effective way to accomplish what Trump did.

What rioters have gotten unrelated charges dropped due to a pardon? A pardon doesn't erase the crime, it only reduces the sentence, therefore the search would still be legal. Are there actual examples that contradict that.

I don't approve of blanket pardons anymore than I approve of not prosecuting/punishing the BLM rioters. It was certainly hypocritical of the left to go hard for the J6ers while playing patty cake with the BLM rioters.
Exactly, how long did the J6th people... have to sit rotting in jail?
 
We? Who is we? The illegal immigrants? Are they we?
Humans, you dunce.
There is no effing way you went to college, given your repeated demonstrations here that you didn't learn a goddamn thing in grade school.
******* ponderous.
5th time. liar.
Already proved it several times.
FFS, you're now arguing that human rights are GIVEN to people. JFC, you are low on the IQ scale.
Pointing out that you argued about living wages but where is your bleeding heart for these illegals earning a living wage? Is it just when you want to clash with the right that you have an opinion?
YOU are the one conflating arguments in a failed attempt to support your narrative.

It has nothing to do with the discussion of Trump backpedaling, but guess what a living wage in Mexico is: $615 a month. $7 an hour is what, $1200 a month? That's DOUBLE their living wage. That's like a North Carolinan making $43 an hour.


I guess so.

I think they work jobs at lower wages because they are making more than they would at home... which is where they send their earning anyway.
See above. So you now want American citizens to get a living wage, or are you still against it, and only want illegals to get a US living wage?
Yes, businesses will pay illegals less than they would have to pay Americans for the same job.
Are these the same "lazy illegals" that are taking all of our jobs and living off our welfare benefits?
My arguments are fine until you attempt to spin them.
There is no NEED to spin them. Unless you are describing it as "spin" when I prove them wrong, which I so often do.
 
Last edited:
Why don't you and little Robbie hop back over the border A and go the **** back to Canada... A.

Cry more, snowflake.

What you're calling a major double standard doesn't look all that major to me. As I said, the J6ers got it worse than the BLM rioters and I'd argue the BLM rioters did worse. I don't see how not or soft prosecuting is any better than pardoning people. The left just found a more effective way to accomplish what Trump did.

What rioters have gotten unrelated charges dropped due to a pardon? A pardon doesn't erase the crime, it only reduces the sentence, therefore the search would still be legal. Are there actual examples that contradict that.

I don't approve of blanket pardons anymore than I approve of not prosecuting/punishing the BLM rioters. It was certainly hypocritical of the left to go hard for the J6ers while playing patty cake with the BLM rioters.

The BLM riots certainly caused more damage. But storming the capitol building and forcing congress to evacuate in an attempt to prevent the certification of the election.....along with all of the other attempts to overturn the election results......goes beyond just vandalism.

Link (https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/20/justice-department-january-6-clemency-guns-00205357) discusses the justice department pushing for "related" crimes to be dropped if they were discovered during the January 6th investigation. The child **** guy was a bad example. That was my error. He's using this claim as a defense, but I find it hard to believe that even the justice department would go to bat for him. But again....why is this guy getting a pardon at all, for anything? Pieces of shit like him....like the people attacking capitol police?

The BLM rioters weren't acting on behalf of any of the democrat politicians that you've named. Should some of their sentences been more harsh? Yeah, probably. I don't know specifics of many of those cases. But comparing them to Trump pardoning the rioters that attacked the capitol and assaulted capitol police ON CAMERA and on Trump's behalf.....is not comparable in the least. Especially considering the current narrative surrounding protests going on right now. You can't seriously eat up the BS narratives for Trump activating military to deal with protests/riots.....when he's shown that riots that are conducted under his name are perfectly fine. Law and order my ***. Trump is a lawless goon.
 
The ongoing complaint that the BLM/Floyd rioters did not get charged with enough completely ignores the fact that they got charged with violating the laws that they violated.

You don't get to charge someone with a felony if they committed a misdemeanor. That's how our law works.

The people in J6 were charged with committing the crimes they committed, all the way up to seditious conspiracy.
None were charged and convicted with a crime they didn't commit.
 
Last edited:
Cry more, snowflake.



The BLM riots certainly caused more damage. But storming the capitol building and forcing congress to evacuate in an attempt to prevent the certification of the election.....along with all of the other attempts to overturn the election results......goes beyond just vandalism.

Link (https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/20/justice-department-january-6-clemency-guns-00205357) discusses the justice department pushing for "related" crimes to be dropped if they were discovered during the January 6th investigation. The child **** guy was a bad example. That was my error. He's using this claim as a defense, but I find it hard to believe that even the justice department would go to bat for him. But again....why is this guy getting a pardon at all, for anything? Pieces of shit like him....like the people attacking capitol police?

The BLM rioters weren't acting on behalf of any of the democrat politicians that you've named. Should some of their sentences been more harsh? Yeah, probably. I don't know specifics of many of those cases. But comparing them to Trump pardoning the rioters that attacked the capitol and assaulted capitol police ON CAMERA and on Trump's behalf.....is not comparable in the least. Especially considering the current narrative surrounding protests going on right now. You can't seriously eat up the BS narratives for Trump activating military to deal with protests/riots.....when he's shown that riots that are conducted under his name are perfectly fine. Law and order my ***. Trump is a lawless goon.
Why don't you and your dad Rob go hold each other lovingly in the corner.
 
Humans, you dunce.
There is no effing way you went to college, given your repeated demonstrations here that you didn't learn a goddamn thing in grade school.
******* ponderous.

Already proved it several times.
FFS, you're now arguing that human rights are GIVEN to people. JFC, you are low on the IQ scale.

YOU are the one conflating arguments in a failed attempt to support your narrative.

It has nothing to do with the discussion of Trump backpedaling, but guess what a living wage in Mexico is: $615 a month. $7 an hour is what, $1200 a month? That's DOUBLE their living wage. That's like a North Carolinan making $43 an hour.



See above. So you now want American citizens to get a living wage, or are you still against it, and only want illegals to get a US living wage?

Are these the same "lazy illegals" that are taking all of our jobs and living off our welfare benefits?

There is no NEED to spin them. Unless you are describing it as "spin" when I prove them wrong, which I so often do.
This is just proving what I said. Twisting and spinning what I said. You really are pathetic. Then you have the nerve to claim you prove me wrong.
 
The ongoing complaint that the BLM/Floyd rioters did not get charged with enough completely ignores the fact that they got charged with violating the laws that they violated.

You don't get to charge someone with a felony if they committed a misdemeanor. That's how our law works.

The people in J6 were charged with committing the crimes they committed, all the way up to seditious conspiracy.
None were charged and convicted with a crime they didn't commit.
Yeah, because RobGMN says so!!
 
Just curious Rob why you think the left gets to change the COTUS.
More deflection and tapdancing.
I quote the words of the COTUS verbatim, and you deny them.
I reference SCOTUS decisions, and you deny them.
I reference the J6 events, and you deny them.
I reference the 30,000+ documented lies that Trump has told, and you deny them.
I reference medical science, and you deny it.
I reference circuit design theory, and you deny it.
I reference definitions in the OED and you deny them.
I reference basic mathematics, and you deny it.

Why do you think you get to change all of those things, based on your personal beliefs?
 
Last edited:
More deflection and tapdancing.
I quote the words of the COTUS verbatim, and you deny them.
I reference SCOTUS decisions, and you deny them.
I reference the J6 events, and you deny them.
I reference the 30,000+ documented lies that Trump has told, and you deny them.
I reference medical science, and you deny it.
I reference circuit design theory, and you deny it.
I reference definitions in the OED and you deny them.
I reference basis mathematics, and you deny it.

Why do you think you get to change all of those things, based on your personal beliefs?
Triggered there fella?
 
Yeah, because RobGMN says so!!
No, because the JUSTICE SYSTEM says so.
You do realize all this information is available to YOU too, yes?

You can reference factual data to form your beliefs and opinions with, instead of just constantly making up incorrect shit and then insisting you are correct.

As simple as you are, you MUST realize at least that.
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,954
Views
497,257
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top