Current events discussion

HAHAHAHA. You ask for an example, and I provide it in a few seconds. And then, I am "reaching".
I swear, it's like shooting fish in a barrel with you. It's almost like you intentionally set yourself up to be smacked down.
You call that and example? That's why I said you are reaching. You're struggling to come up with basic shit... so much so that you have to tell lies about me.
 
I have used the word entomology literally THOUSANDS of times in my previous field of work. I assure you, it is habit. Not that ANYONE here needs to justify a damn thing to a do boy secretary.
HAHAHAAH. You are not only an expert in human anatomy, the justice system, the economy, mathematics, the English language, but now you are an expert in the study of insects?

Holy crap. Are you flying to the ISS next?
 
You call that and example? That's why I said you are reaching. You're struggling to come up with basic shit... so much so that you have to tell lies about me.
"Now, show me where I insist anything." - Thxone

"The COTUS is speaking of Americans." -Thxone
"Justify that for me right ******* now!" - Thxone

Yeah, "reaching". lol
 
Rob you are literally that guy who comes on here claiming he is correct about EVERYTHING. We are all wrong and you are going to prove it, right? Who is insisting anything? You are.

You got one right, I insisted that you justify something... guess what, you couldn't. You failed.
The other is a statement... there is not a hint of insisting in that statement. You failed again.
 
WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.

Yes, it IS speaking of, for and to Americans. I am sorry your education has failed you.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep345/usrep345206/usrep345206.pdf

Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206, 212 (1953); see also Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976) (There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.); Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 215 (1982) (holding that unlawfully present aliens were entitled to both due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment).

Oops, you are wrong. Again.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I should look up the entomology of that word. But I'm busy right now in the wheelhouse of my fishing boat.
Of course, by "in" I actually mean "passing through".

HAHAHAHAHA
Damn... I guess I struck the nail on the head when I mentioned the little dick thing... you seem really triggered Rob. I was generalizing... you shouldn't take that personally. (literally)
 
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep345/usrep345206/usrep345206.pdf

Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206, 212 (1953); see also Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976) (There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.); Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 215 (1982) (holding that unlawfully present aliens were entitled to both due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment).

Oops, you are wrong. Again.
Oh, here we go with the insistent over explaining.
 
Damn... I guess I struck the nail on the head when I mentioned the little dick thing... you seem really triggered Rob. I was generalizing... you shouldn't take that personally. (literally)
No one cares about the size of your junk. Your obsession about other dudes' junk is your own thing, not ours.
At least, no one else is constantly talking about it here like you do.
 
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep345/usrep345206/usrep345206.pdf

Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206, 212 (1953); see also Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976) (There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.); Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 215 (1982) (holding that unlawfully present aliens were entitled to both due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment).

Oops, you are wrong. Again.
What are we supposed to be protecting ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS from?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,954
Views
497,690
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top