Current events discussion

"They went against the voters and put in Hilary and they put in Kamala without even taking votes."

And yet you claim you know how the system works...
Sanders had more votes than Clinton, back in 2016, but the DNC put in Clinton. 2024, the DNC put in Kamala without letting the civilians vote. Were you not able to understand what was being said?
 
So, Los Angeles has a large riot going on. Cars and buildings are getting burned down, cops are bein attacked, and people are getting hurt. Newsom doesn't want to do anything but let it all burn. Trump send in the National Guard and now Newsom is going to sue Trump for it. Sue someone because they send help?
 
Sanders had more votes than Clinton, back in 2016, but the DNC put in Clinton. 2024, the DNC put in Kamala without letting the civilians vote. Were you not able to understand what was being said?
What's your point?
Do you think that's illegal, or not allowed, or something?

You said you know how the process works. So why are you making g these irrelevant statements?
 
As long as whatever it is, is in his/their favor it is ok and protected somehow by the COTUS. He has still yet to show me where in the constitution it says that a party can just slip in a new candidate when the one running drops out.
Show me in the COTUS where it says tha party can't select their own candidate.

Show me where Biden was selected as the candidate who was to run.

Explain why you think the FEC decides who can be chosen as a candidate.

Explain why you think late July to mid September is "spring".

Explain what delegates do.

You seem to know none of these things, yet claim you are right that Kamala should not have been allowed to be a candidate.
 
As long as whatever it is, is in his/their favor it is ok and protected somehow by the COTUS. He has still yet to show me where in the constitution it says that a party can just slip in a new candidate when the one running drops out.
The parties are private organizations. Unfortunately we as a country has allowed them to gain the power to essentially chose our presidents. They aren't bound by the feds how they nominate their candidates.
 
Show me in the COTUS where it says tha party can't select their own candidate.
Nomination process:
  • The Constitution doesn't specify how candidates are nominated: This part of the process is primarily handled by the political parties.
  • Primaries and caucuses: Candidates typically go through state primary elections and caucuses to win delegates who support them at national party conventions.
  • National conventions: Political parties hold national conventions to formally select their presidential and vice presidential nominees
They did none of this.
Show me where Biden was selected as the candidate who was to run.
He was running wasn't he? In the correct time frame.
Explain why you think the FEC decides who can be chosen as a candidate.
I'd be happy to if I ever made that statement.
Explain why you think late July to mid September is "spring".
Again, never made that statement. In fact I specifically said July and said that is summer time.
Explain what delegates do.
Explain what a ****** is for.
You seem to know none of these things, yet claim you are right that Kamala should not have been allowed to be a candidate.
So you are just going to fail? Wow. Good job deflecting and once again being too cowardly to answer questions on an internet forum.
 
There's no way any honest person can say that biden's "campaign" was ran with the intent to win reelection
Agree 110%. It was so obvious Biden wasn't playing with a full deck of cards. IMHO, Kamala probably should have taken over as POTUS ~2022. When you don't know what direction to go in when somebody is literally telling you where to go, it's time to give up the Presidency.
 
Sanders had more votes than Clinton, back in 2016, but the DNC put in Clinton. 2024, the DNC put in Kamala without letting the civilians vote. Were you not able to understand what was being said?
I don't think he understood what you were referring to. It took like 10 pages for us explain "Sleepy Joe" to Rob and I'm still not sure if got it and that's just a nickname. 2 election cycles over the course of 9 years can get rather confusing.
 
As long as whatever it is, is in his/their favor it is ok and protected somehow by the COTUS. He has still yet to show me where in the constitution it says that a party can just slip in a new candidate when the one running drops out.
I don't see it in the COTUS either. It's interesting though, basically the whole nomination process could be used to put in whoever "they" want. Hypothetically, Trump could run for nomination again, handpick who wants to be the nominee for his VP and then drop out citing that's he's dropping out due to age, etc and hand the nomination to his hand picked candidate. The DNC has opened up a world of possibilities.
 
So, Los Angeles has a large riot going on. Cars and buildings are getting burned down, cops are bein attacked, and people are getting hurt. Newsom doesn't want to do anything but let it all burn. Trump send in the National Guard and now Newsom is going to sue Trump for it. Sue someone because they send help?
Amazing isn't it? They actually want the riots.
 
I don't see it in the COTUS either. It's interesting though, basically the whole nomination process could be used to put in whoever "they" want. Hypothetically, Trump could run for nomination again, handpick who wants to be the nominee for his VP and then drop out citing that's he's dropping out due to age, etc and hand the nomination to his hand picked candidate. The DNC has opened up a world of possibilities.
We have similar thoughts.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,954
Views
499,290
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top