Show the video with the hand-to-chest chest thump followed by the arm snap to 45 degrees.Photo. Intent is to prove she is a Nazi.
![]()
Show the video to prove she wasn't saying "my nephew was this tall".
Show the video from THIS moment in time.
Show the video with the hand-to-chest chest thump followed by the arm snap to 45 degrees.Photo. Intent is to prove she is a Nazi.
![]()
As opposed to the pictures that Putin has of Trump ***** with a teen girl, and the ensuing action Trump has taken to get Ukraine to surrender to Russia?Photo. Intent is showing that Biden and Putin are best friends and plan to rule the world together.
View attachment 65421
Stop tapdancing. Tell me the source you will accept.So you are saying it is a FACT that photo's show intent?
Ahhh the goalpost... now it's "show me the video"Show the video with the hand-to-chest chest thump followed by the arm snap to 45 degrees.
Show the video to prove she wasn't saying "my nephew was this tall".
Show the video from THIS moment in time.
Lies and deception. You dirty trash talking liberal!!As opposed to the pictures that Putin has of Trump ***** with a teen girl, and the ensuing action Trump has taken to get Ukraine to surrender to Russia?
Show us the evidence of Biden bending over to do Putin's bidding, like Trump has.
Don't deflect. When are you going to accept that your interpretation of VERBATIM is wrong?Stop tapdancing. Tell me the source you will accept.
You don't even have to say court convictions, because those are indisputable.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5572_l6hn.pdf
Obstruction of an official proceeding. That proceeding being the Electoral College vote.
"Goalpost"? When did I ask you to show me a pic of someone showing the height of their nephew?Ahhh the goalpost... now it's "show me the video"
It was the same time you and others like you wanted to claim Elon is saluting the Nazi party."Goalpost"? When did I ask you to show me a pic of someone showing the height of their nephew?
Another court case: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/Brian%20McCreary%20Government%20Sentencing%20Memorandum.pdf
"The Capitol breach was sui generis: a mass crime with significant distinguishing features, including the historic assault on the seat of legislative branch of federal government, the vast size of the mob, the goal of impeding if not preventing the peaceful transfer of Presidential power, the use of violence by a substantial number of rioters against law enforcement officials, and large number of victims"
"going to accept that your interpretation" - ThxoneDon't deflect. When are you going to accept that your interpretation of VERBATIM is wrong?
Good job posting a dead link."going to accept that your interpretation" - Thxone
Yet another verbatim quote.
It is word-for word. It does not alter the words. It does not change the position of the words relative to each other. it is not a paraphrase. It is a quote.
Do you just ENJOY being wrong and showing the other people here that you are wrong?
verbatim - in a way that uses exactly the same words as were originally used
"Effective teams can be difficult to describe because “high performance along one domain does not translate to high performance along another” (Ervin et al., 2018, p. 470)."
Oh look, they used PART of a sentence as a quote.
How can APA not know the rules Thxone has created for a verbatim quote?
quote- repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker
Oxford Languages
What's that you say? A "GROUP OF WORDS"? Not EVERY SINGLE WORD OF THE ORIGINAL?
Amazing
English 101, kid
Works fine for me.Good job posting a dead link.
A quote must verbatim, or it is not a quote.Again you just prove your ego runs you. A quote can be partial. A verbatim quote cannot.
Let me guess, you will claim there is only one way to quote now?