Winners only.

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Not as bad as some of the other ones I've seen. I guess the *****+ crowd doesn't get that they turn off many of their own supporters by turning *****+ events into public burlesque shows with kiddies in attendance. Not sure why that isn't sinking through their thick skulls.

notice no one cut ties with them.. banks or celebrities.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Madonna

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No he can't. Only Congress can do that.

I am speaking about Congress... it's why I said they and not He.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Fucked up" what, exactly? Showing a stock chart to adults in the context of Target and the Conservapubs threatening to boycott?
As I said, I will dumb down my future posts so that even you can understand them. Sorry to overestimate your abilities.

It IS ironic that you are trying to "get" me with this nonsense, yet STILL refuse to say what a "screwup" would be on Biden's part regarding the possible rail strike. Seems like you want to keep options open so you can be full of hate toward him no matter WHAT he does.

Like I said, you clearly have an angle you want to pursue so you can argue this screwup thing so just get to it. You already know everything so you tell me.

I am so sure that only conservatives and republicans were against the restroom thing. No liberals or Democrats would ever be against that. Pfffttt.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I knew it was the stock price. Clearly Target's "pro-*****" statement didn't tank the company.

Still wondering what constitutes "success" or "screwing up" in this railroad workers strike? If Biden is able to broker a "pro worker" deal is that success? Does he merely have to avoid a prolonged strike?

Personally this negotiation reminds me of when Sir Richard Branson tried to negotiate a Led Zepplin Reunion tour. Robert Plant still subtilty refers to it interviews.

No, you assumed. It just happens to be a correct assumption. There is nothing on the chart describing what it is.

As far as the screwup conversation... you and Rob really are hung up on that. Ask him. He already has an angle he wants to use to argue about it. I'm not interested.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I am speaking about Congress... it's why I said they and not He.

But I asked about Biden. So you're saying Biden's powers are limited? Still haven't addressed the question at hand, what constitutes "screwing it up?" What constitutes "success?" Biden's made it 3 months without a strike, is that "success?" Is a failure for not having this wrapped up yet, and why?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Marjorie in Chargorie and Lindell leading the GOP - entertainment at it's finest.

MSN

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

No, you assumed. It just happens to be a correct assumption. There is nothing on the chart describing what it is.

As far as the screwup conversation... you and Rob really are hung up on that. Ask him. He already has an angle he wants to use to argue about it. I'm not interested.

No, I knew it was a stock chart. Rob referenced how well the company was doing, since the Y-axis wasn't in millions, that made it pretty clear we were dealing something that could be measured in smaller denominations, like stock price. It was the only logical conclusion to draw from the chart posted and the context of Rob's post.

I get it, you want to dodge the question. Better to leave it open ended so you can blame Biden regardless the outcome.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, I knew it was a stock chart. Rob referenced how well the company was doing, since the Y-axis wasn't in millions, that made it pretty clear we were dealing something that could be measured in smaller denominations, like stock price. It was the only logical conclusion to draw from the chart posted and the context of Rob's post.

I get it, you want to dodge the question. Better to leave it open ended so you can blame Biden regardless the outcome.

Listen, I'm tired of giving answers only to have the two of you say you don't accept the answer. Use your common sense. If they strike and Biden was involved, he screwed up, if not, he didn't. Period.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Like I said, you clearly have an angle you want to pursue so you can argue this screwup thing so just get to it. You already know everything so you tell me.

I am so sure that only conservatives and republicans were against the restroom thing. No liberals or Democrats would ever be against that. Pfffttt.

Speaking of "spin", you have gone so off the rails on this that I have NO idea what the hell you are even on about.
"I am so sure that only conservatives and republicans were against the restroom thing. No liberals or Democrats would ever be against that. Pfffttt."

What does that have anything to do with the AFA boycotting the store after the unauthorized announcement was made? What Democrat/Liberal group made a huge stink about it, signing petitions, boycotting, threatening to put the company out of business?
I'll wait for a reply.

In the meantime, you seem to know an awful lot about the situation for someone who was so confused by my reference to it with an accompanying snip of a stock price graph.
'Funny how you adjust the situation as needed to fit your narrative, eh?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Listen, I'm tired of giving answers only to have the two of you say you don't accept the answer. Use your common sense. If they strike and Biden was involved, he screwed up, if not, he didn't. Period.

"If they strike" it's because the union/workers and the employer cannot agree, but that is somehow Biden's fault?
Neither Biden nor Congress are at the bargaining table.

You basically just want to hate on Biden for anything that you can blame him for, even when he has nothing to do with it. Yet you whine that others hate Trump for no reason other than to hate (as if his myriad failings are not a reason).

So transparent. So hypocritical.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Nina Jankowicz testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on misinformation, conspiracy theories, and infodemics at a virtual hearing on Oct. 15, 2020, in a still from video. (House Intelligence Committee/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
US NEWS
Former White House ‘Disinformation Czar’ Nina Jankowicz Registers as Foreign Agent
By Naveen Athrappully
November 28, 2022 Updated: November 28, 2022