Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 42787

If your words have no value to you, why would you expect them to have value to anyone else?
What moron declares his intelligence but misspells the words in his declaration?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Negative. It could not have been the goal of those protestors that went to the Capitol Building. Unusually light security, instigators and what not. If the intent was to stop a vote then they would have done just that what with all the help Democrats gave them like planted weapons, light security, people coaching them on what to do, police letting people in.... man, you are right, it DOES sound well planned. Except your people planned it and set it in motion.

Seriously kid, you are just as much a tinfoil-hat wearing nutcase as Buck.
Where do you hear this shit and how the fvck can you actually believe it unless it’s the only thing you can hang on to, to continue the myth of Trump as your lord and savior?
Is this Alex Jones crap?

“It could not have been the goal”? You mean they just somehow woke up and they had stormed police barricades and climbed in Windows of the Capitol from some weird force driving their bodies?
You’re either just being a ridiculous devil’s advocate, or your IQ is too low to to be able to see reality.

I mean, if we’re just going to believe any ridiculous theory, I’ll posit that Trump and his kids planned this whole thing. They armed the people. They lightened the security. They paid to transport people from all over. Trump went radio silent for 3 full hours while his sycophants caused mayhem, but was actually communicating with them via SMS, telling them what to do.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Seriously kid, you are just as much a tinfoil-hat wearing nutcase as Buck.
Where do you hear this shit and how the fvck can you actually believe it unless it’s the only thing you can hang on to, to continue the myth of Trump as your lord and savior?
Is this Alex Jones crap?

“It could not have been the goal”? You mean they just somehow woke up and they had stormed police barricades and climbed in Windows of the Capitol from some weird force driving their bodies?
You’re either just being a ridiculous devil’s advocate, or your IQ is too low to to be able to see reality.

I can understand why YOU keep lashing out like this. Insults, disbelief, more insults, ignorance, even more insults. For the record I am 48 years old stupid. I am neither a kid or a goat. What kind of limited brain functions do you have that because someone has opinions they are of low I.Q. and or Trump is their savior? Because you think the events of Jan 6th are one way they can be no other way?? The way you see the events is the only correct way to see them??

So Rob, is it your contention that the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Lol, if America wanted to do a real insurrection, there’s nothing the federal gov could do short of blowing up all of DC. How stupid are people to think America would have an unarmed insurrection; you’d really have to be a special type of stupid to believe that. You have 100,000 people or whatever show up to DC with long guns, there’s not much the gov could do about the sheer numbers. I don’t want that; I’m just saying a real insurrection would have involved probably 1000’s upon 1000’s of deaths. Get real

How stupid do you have to be to think the WTC towers, a chunk of the Pentagon, and billions in damage could be taken out by a few guys with box cutters? An act that put us at war for 20 years.
Think about it.

Again, failure to achieve a goal (whether a realistic goal or not) does NOT mean no attempt was made.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

How stupid do you have to be to think the WTC towers, a chunk of the Pentagon, and billions in damage could be taken out by a few guys with box cutters? An act that put us at war for 20 years.
Think about it.

Again, failure to achieve a goal (whether a realistic goal or not) does NOT mean no attempt was made.

You have to be really stupid to believe the official story of 9/11, yes.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I can understand why YOU keep lashing out like this. Insults, disbelief, more insults, ignorance, even more insults. For the record I am 48 years old stupid. I am neither a kid or a goat. What kind of limited brain functions do you have that because someone has opinions they are of low I.Q. and or Trump is their savior? Because you think the events of Jan 6th are one way they can be no other way?? The way you see the events is the only correct way to see them??

So Rob, is it your contention that the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents?

Disbelief in outrageous claims that are made with no evidence to back them.
You could be 70 for all I care. The level of gullibility you exhibit by believing the claims can only indicate a lower IQ, or an incredibly strong desire to not see the truth.

I’m not sure where you came up with the idea that I believe “the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents”. I’ve never made a suggestion that even remotely resembles that, and though I’m not a student of history, I know for a fact that has happened plenty of times.

It’s actually a really weird strawman to present. What gave you the idea?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You have to be really stupid to believe the official story of 9/11, yes.

Oh HERE we go.
Another stupid fvcking 9/11 conspiracy clown shows his colors.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Disbelief in outrageous claims that are made with no evidence to back them.
You could be 70 for all I care. The level of gullibility you exhibit by believing the claims can only indicate a lower IQ, or an incredibly strong desire to not see the truth.

I’m not sure where you came up with the idea that I believe “the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents”. I’ve never made a suggestion that even remotely resembles that, and though I’m not a student of history, I know for a fact that has happened plenty of times.

It’s actually a really weird strawman to present. What gave you the idea?

This is a QUESTION. I know you can see the question mark. Seriously Rob, I ask you a direct damn question... all you had to do is say yes or no. If you chose to explain either, I would happily read it. I have NO IDEA what sends you in the direction you take instead of answering. It's like you don't want to be questioned you just want to put down any one else's opinions.

"So Rob, is it your contention that the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents?"

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s obvious a cruise missile hit the pentagon, and flight 93 blew up before it hit the ground. Lol you really gotta be stupid to think a plane could fit through that tiny hole in the pentagon.

Lol where’s any part of the plane?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s obvious a cruise missile hit the pentagon, and flight 93 blew up before it hit the ground. Lol you really gotta be stupid to think a plane could fit through that tiny hole in the pentagon.

View attachment 42799

Lol where’s any part of the plane?

View attachment 42800


View attachment 42797

View attachment 42798

With how low the hole was in the pentagon wall, the nose of the plane would’ve been so low that the engines would’ve buried into the ground well before the plane could’ve ever made it to the Pentagon, and that’s just common sense. Planes don’t just just disappear, and where are the wing holes? There’s no wing holes in the Pentagon, so where the f*ck did the wings magically teleport off to?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

This is a QUESTION. I know you can see the question mark. Seriously Rob, I ask you a direct damn question... all you had to do is say yes or no. If you chose to explain either, I would happily read it. I have NO IDEA what sends you in the direction you take instead of answering. It's like you don't want to be questioned you just want to put down any one else's opinions.

"So Rob, is it your contention that the government does not and will never engage in, be it directly or indirectly, the sabotaging of political opponents?"

It’s as obvious a “NO” as it could possibly be.
“I’ve never made a suggestion that even remotely resembles that,…” should be a stronger clue than you could ever need.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

With how low the hole was in the pentagon wall, the nose of the plane would’ve been so low that the engines would’ve buried into the ground well before the plane could’ve ever made it to the Pentagon, and that’s just common sense. Planes don’t just just disappear, and where are the wing holes? There’s no wing holes in the Pentagon, so where the f*ck did the wings magically teleport off to?

Yes. You never leave your chair, but you’ve done a thorough forensic analysis of the crime scene, and know that it’s all impossible.
Just like you threw the winning pass in the last Super Bowl from your easy chair, and participated in the Bin Laden kill in Pakistan.

Gimme a fvcking break, dude. You’re moving to the level of complete fvcking idiot instead of just conspiracy whackadoodle.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You don’t have to be very smart to see that a plane didn’t hit the Pentagon; it’s rather obvious.