Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You just dismiss everything he says wholesale without checking into any of it...just another bs tactic...

At a certain point, when you've read a dozen articles and they're all conspiracy BS, unsubstantiated rumor, twisted distortions of reality, half truths, etc - yes you start to dismiss everything.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

"Conspiracy to [insert any crime]" I think conspiracy charges are stupid, but they still exist. "Obstruction!"

Those who were acquitted legally committed zero crimes.

Now that we're over the technicalities, can we have a productive conversation?

Epps is on video coaxing people to commit crimes. Trump is on camera telling people to be peaceful and patriotic. I suspect Epps was more effective (by the numbers) than Trump at bringing people to the capitol.

You conveniently missed the words go down there and fight like hell. I didn't see people at the Capitol wearing Epps hats. Just sayin'. Did you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you want to witness the **** or see a video of it happening. Ok.

So, you won't answer the question? Figures.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You conveniently missed the words go down there and fight like hell. I didn't see people at the Capitol wearing Epps hats. Just sayin'. Did you?

You conveniently think "fight" has only one meaning. A physical act. Biased.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

All this bullshit from the same people who wanted to change the definition of recession. Doesn't support our need... just change it. The people are stupid, it won't take any effort to convince them.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

All this bullshit from the same people who wanted to change the definition of recession. Doesn't support our need... just change it. The people are stupid, it won't take any effort to convince them.

Good non sequitur and after hominem.
“The insurrection happened. There is proof. They intended to stop the Electoral College vote. There is proof. There is NO proof that it was incited by a handful of left wingers.”

“Yeah, but you want to change the definition of recession, therefore you are an idiot”.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

America is bad speech:

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘The Pentagon has ordered a sweeping audit of how it conducts clandestine information warfare after major social media companies identified and took offline fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military in violation of the platforms’ rules.’

‘The State Department and CIA have been perturbed by the military’s use of clandestine tactics. Officers at State have admonished the Defense Department, “Hey don’t amplify our policies using fake personas, because we don’t want to be seen as creating false grass roots efforts,” the first defense official said.’

MSN

www.msn.com

I’m sure it’s only overseas

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I guess the former director of national intelligence is also a conspiracy theorist


'In this lengthy interview with John Ratcliffe and Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents. Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.'

'Ratcliffe suspects the documents are essentially the DOJ and FBI work products, including interviews with ‘sources’ like Igor Danchenko, from their fabricated case against President Trump. If accurate, the objective of the DOJ/FBI would be to avoid sunlight on their political targeting operation.'

Sunday Talks, John Ratcliffe Questions the DOJ/FBI Classified Designations in Mar-a-Lago Documents - The Last Refuge

Ratcliffe does not believe the documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent 'sources and methods' used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I guess the former director of national intelligence is also a conspiracy theorist


'In this lengthy interview with John Ratcliffe and Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents. Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.'

'Ratcliffe suspects the documents are essentially the DOJ and FBI work products, including interviews with ‘sources’ like Igor Danchenko, from their fabricated case against President Trump. If accurate, the objective of the DOJ/FBI would be to avoid sunlight on their political targeting operation.'

Sunday Talks, John Ratcliffe Questions the DOJ/FBI Classified Designations in Mar-a-Lago Documents - The Last Refuge

Ratcliffe does not believe the documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent 'sources and methods' used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

theconservativetreehouse.com

Irrelevant. If they were not declassified, he should not have had them.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 42774

How many soldiers did we send to take out Bin Laden?