Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Sound Deadener Question - COSTS AudioTechnix vs. SoundDeadener Showdown
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NutHugger" data-source="post: 7710179" data-attributes="member: 627450"><p>It's pretty simple to see. You have lots of options with sds. If you take the time to read his guides etc you can make your vehicle sound pretty good. BUT, the gains over laying those products properly vs AT properly are difficult to spot by the layman. Chances are you wouldn't even notice. I say this not to push someone in one direction or another, but to take a cost vs performance look at it. It's like someone coming on here and saying "I can get this 1500w amp for 100 and this 1750w amp for 200. Which should I go with?" Since we know they both do what they say they will do, and the difference is so small it's imperceivable, the answer is clear. There are a lot of nuthuggers on this forum... thus my name. That's why they are so loyal to a brand saying x is WAY better than y.... when in reality that may not really be the case and they have NOT used both so they don't really know. People like me have used both. Admittedly I haven't had every sds product out there. They ARE good. Great even. But are they THAT much better? Probably if i was into sq competition, but for my use no. AT is more than adequate and fits in my budget. It's a nice product professionally done and with great customer service.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NutHugger, post: 7710179, member: 627450"] It's pretty simple to see. You have lots of options with sds. If you take the time to read his guides etc you can make your vehicle sound pretty good. BUT, the gains over laying those products properly vs AT properly are difficult to spot by the layman. Chances are you wouldn't even notice. I say this not to push someone in one direction or another, but to take a cost vs performance look at it. It's like someone coming on here and saying "I can get this 1500w amp for 100 and this 1750w amp for 200. Which should I go with?" Since we know they both do what they say they will do, and the difference is so small it's imperceivable, the answer is clear. There are a lot of nuthuggers on this forum... thus my name. That's why they are so loyal to a brand saying x is WAY better than y.... when in reality that may not really be the case and they have NOT used both so they don't really know. People like me have used both. Admittedly I haven't had every sds product out there. They ARE good. Great even. But are they THAT much better? Probably if i was into sq competition, but for my use no. AT is more than adequate and fits in my budget. It's a nice product professionally done and with great customer service. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Sound Deadener Question - COSTS AudioTechnix vs. SoundDeadener Showdown
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh