+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Reload Thread: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

  1. #1
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird



    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    So I am no expert on this matter but I know I have read quite a few things that relate to how loud something will be based off the cone area but also taken into account is excursion etc etc etc a lot of **** I have no idea about. Lets count out "Its all in the enclosure mannn".

    My question is, since the surround on the X is so large and the cone so small would output be sacrificed for excursion in this case, or would the excursion make up for the lessened cone area? I was thinking about getting a 12" but the cone looks so small im worried about output.

    Would this be something I should be worried about?

    Should I just save up and get the 15" instead if I want the same output as say another 12" (Sundown SA, HDC3, W7, RE MX)?

    Any insight appreciated, not sure where to start.

    Trey



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.




  2. #2
    sundownz's Avatar
    sundownz is online now Supporting Vendor sundownz is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    sundownz is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    11,008
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)

  3. Thanks TreyE thanked for this post
  4. #3
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by sundownz View Post
    The difference in cone area is ~10% and is a non-issue.
    So would that be considered 10% less output? AKA inaudible to our ears obviously. Im more interested in technicality of it all honestly lol

    Such as is xmax considered part of output? Cone area play a bigger part? Im like a 2 year old with these questions, couldnt find a definitive answer when searched

    The X subwoofer intrigues me I likey



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.

  5. #4
    DRS0105's Avatar
    DRS0105 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    123
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    I believe the subs are oversized also which would make up for the potentially lost cone area. Ie:the 10 is closer to a true 11




  6. #5
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by DRS0105 View Post
    I believe the subs are oversized also which would make up for the potentially lost cone area. Ie:the 10 is closer to a true 11
    Ah I didnt even think to look at that
    Last edited by TreyE; 09-18-2013 at 10:11 AM.



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.

  7. #6
    bbeljefe's Avatar
    bbeljefe is offline Premium Member bbeljefe is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Posts
    1,788
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Usable piston diameter consists of the cone plus ~1/3 to 1/2 of the surround. So when you look at cone area, envision that half of the surround is also a part of the piston area that actually moves air.

    To my knowledge, the X isn't over sized. I haven't used them but I've used the SA and Z series and they're the same physical dimension at the mounting ring and I can't imagine a manufacturer making a mid line sub larger than its top line.

    But back to piston area... a low powered 10 with little xmax will usually measure 8-8.5" of piston area. A high powered, high xmax 10 will usually measure 7.75-8.25" of piston. So for the low powered speaker (using the larger of the numbers) you have 56.75inⁿ of piston area and with the high powered one you have 53.46inⁿ of piston area.

    To begin with, that's not much of a difference. But then if you consider that the low powered sub has ~11mm of xmax (just under ") while the high powered sub has ~22mm (about 7/8"), you can see that the high powered driver will displace a lot more air.

    The reason.... you have 6% less cone area with the high powered driver but, you have 100% more xmax, so the loss in cone area is more than made up or by the amount of travel that smaller cone has.

    And please understand, I'm not quoting specific speakers or making a claim that ALL low powered drivers are this large or have that much xmax. The numbers I used are averages.



    Owner, Audio Anarchy, LLC
    2915 Youree Drive, Shreveport, LA
    318-780-6149

    Authorized Dealer in NW Louisiana for CT Sounds & Execution Audio. We also carry other products but you really don't want that stuff... ;-)


  8. Thanks TreyE thanked for this post
    Likes TreyE liked this post
  9. #7
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by bbeljefe View Post
    Usable piston diameter consists of the cone plus ~1/3 to 1/2 of the surround. So when you look at cone area, envision that half of the surround is also a part of the piston area that actually moves air.

    To my knowledge, the X isn't over sized. I haven't used them but I've used the SA and Z series and they're the same physical dimension at the mounting ring and I can't imagine a manufacturer making a mid line sub larger than its top line.

    But back to piston area... a low powered 10 with little xmax will usually measure 8-8.5" of piston area. A high powered, high xmax 10 will usually measure 7.75-8.25" of piston. So for the low powered speaker (using the larger of the numbers) you have 56.75inⁿ of piston area and with the high powered one you have 53.46inⁿ of piston area.

    To begin with, that's not much of a difference. But then if you consider that the low powered sub has ~11mm of xmax (just under ") while the high powered sub has ~22mm (about 7/8"), you can see that the high powered driver will displace a lot more air.

    The reason.... you have 6% less cone area with the high powered driver but, you have 100% more xmax, so the loss in cone area is more than made up or by the amount of travel that smaller cone has.

    And please understand, I'm not quoting specific speakers or making a claim that ALL low powered drivers are this large or have that much xmax. The numbers I used are averages.


    Exactly what I was looking for. Thank you.



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.

  10. #8
    SPLaudio's Avatar
    SPLaudio is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    upstate ny
    Posts
    6,602
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    295 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    yes 1/2 the surrond is sd.
    the subs are more of a sql sub and have large throw. so if you loose a lil sd but gain excursion you will move more air.
    with spl throw isnt everything...




  11. #9
    SPLaudio's Avatar
    SPLaudio is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    upstate ny
    Posts
    6,602
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    295 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    take alook at all the tc sounds sql woofers from 10yrs ago such as the eclipse ti pro's they had massive surronds...




  12. #10
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by SPLaudio View Post
    yes 1/2 the surrond is sd.
    the subs are more of a sql sub and have large throw. so if you loose a lil sd but gain excursion you will move more air.
    with spl throw isnt everything...
    sd?



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.

  13. #11
    SPLaudio's Avatar
    SPLaudio is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    upstate ny
    Posts
    6,602
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    295 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    cone area




  14. #12
    FineLinePimpin's Avatar
    FineLinePimpin is offline Stuck in WV



    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bunker Hill, WV
    Posts
    444
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Some good info for the lamens in this thread



    Bought from falcons03079313,95saturn,Bassin Brandon,starmountainsound
    2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited.Factory 730n headunit, Polk db 6.5 comp front stage, Polk db 6.5 coax in sound bar
    Formerly Two dual 4ohm Skar MA-8's wired 1ohm to ED nine.1 amp
    Now Imperium Audio Designs Reign 12" with Audio Technix 800.1
    2010 Mustang Gt 5spd. Loaded...Ininity 611a amp and 12in Kappa Perfect sub.

  15. Likes Side Show liked this post
  16. #13
    TreyE's Avatar
    TreyE is offline Lets Get Weird

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Age
    25
    Posts
    3,724
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    @sundownz Do you know displacement of Sundown X 12"? Building a box, just picked one up looking for specs. Andy is building it for me (One of your dealers here in Tampa)



    Don't listen to me.

    Feedback - http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/227670-treye.html
    Also more recent feedback on caco.com under same username and eBay as Willy8788 100% feedback.

  17. #14
    papermaker's Avatar
    papermaker is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lafayatte,LA
    Posts
    2,345
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by bbeljefe View Post
    Usable piston diameter consists of the cone plus ~1/3 to 1/2 of the surround. So when you look at cone area, envision that half of the surround is also a part of the piston area that actually moves air.

    To my knowledge, the X isn't over sized. I haven't used them but I've used the SA and Z series and they're the same physical dimension at the mounting ring and I can't imagine a manufacturer making a mid line sub larger than its top line.

    But back to piston area... a low powered 10 with little xmax will usually measure 8-8.5" of piston area. A high powered, high xmax 10 will usually measure 7.75-8.25" of piston. So for the low powered speaker (using the larger of the numbers) you have 56.75inⁿ of piston area and with the high powered one you have 53.46inⁿ of piston area.

    To begin with, that's not much of a difference. But then if you consider that the low powered sub has ~11mm of xmax (just under ") while the high powered sub has ~22mm (about 7/8"), you can see that the high powered driver will displace a lot more air.

    The reason.... you have 6% less cone area with the high powered driver but, you have 100% more xmax, so the loss in cone area is more than made up or by the amount of travel that smaller cone has.

    And please understand, I'm not quoting specific speakers or making a claim that ALL low powered drivers are this large or have that much xmax. The numbers I used are averages.
    I just wouldn't consider the surround as part of the actual cone. the surround does move but in a non linear fashion. some woofers use a soft surround and the cone extends slightly pass the surround but its sill not a solid linear surface.. that being said the output difference is minimal..



    knowledge is powerful but imagination is exponentially powerful..

    experience is key!! otherwise life is boring, uneventful and pointless..

    sub amps RD audio 1750s(SD3500 when i sell the RDs)---better audio prototypes
    mids CDT ES-6--tweeters CDT ES-02
    comp amp SD sax100.4D(for sale looking for a zapco 1000.4)
    deck..execlon x991

  18. #15
    papermaker's Avatar
    papermaker is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lafayatte,LA
    Posts
    2,345
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sundown X, technical question about output, cone area/excursion

    Quote Originally Posted by SPLaudio View Post
    yes 1/2 the surrond is sd.
    the subs are more of a sql sub and have large throw. so if you loose a lil sd but gain excursion you will move more air.
    with spl throw isnt everything...
    by whos standards.. surround displacement will likely cause more cancellation than output gain.. the surround is strictly for control of the upper part of the cone.. its not supposed to aid in displacement and its not linear as the surround actually moves in a non linear fashion. key is to introduce the least amount of mechanical distortion.. the surround taht works best it then only thing that matters.. the stiff *** erom surrounds are quite non linear.. if rather use a larger linear surround and sacrifice alittle cone area for a muhc more linear stroke..



    knowledge is powerful but imagination is exponentially powerful..

    experience is key!! otherwise life is boring, uneventful and pointless..

    sub amps RD audio 1750s(SD3500 when i sell the RDs)---better audio prototypes
    mids CDT ES-6--tweeters CDT ES-02
    comp amp SD sax100.4D(for sale looking for a zapco 1000.4)
    deck..execlon x991

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. question about cone area calculation for determining pressure class
    By kushy_dreams in forum Advanced SQL/SPL Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-01-2012, 10:26 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 09:12 PM
  3. technical question about Bass Box Pro
    By nauc in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-15-2008, 11:42 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 02:47 AM
  5. Question about Kicker Re-Cone
    By Harrison486 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-19-2005, 05:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum