Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Reload Thread: sub cone area

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In the medium of life
    Age
    27
    Posts
    7,010
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    8
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)

    sub cone area 18

    is the surround counted when finding cone area of sub?what is the equation to figure it out?whats cone area of 18.not solox..just regular 18
    Last edited by marleyskater420; 09-20-2003 at 04:03 AM.







  2. #2
    ss3079's Avatar
    ss3079 is offline Eh Dere Hi Dere Ho-ser



    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    22,571
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Sd - 'The area of a loudspeaker cone'

    Example:

    Kicker CompVR15
    Sd, SqM.0881


    Kicker Solo-Baric L715
    Sd, SqM 0.1056


    - Steve



    Moderator

    2007 Chrysler 300C

    2005 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab
    Optima, Volant, Bully Dog, Corsa, Gibson, Powermaster, California Super Trucks, Fox Racing, Airaid
    Alpine 7998, Alpine HDA-5460, Arc Audio MEQ-30, (2) Adire Audio Shiva, Image Dynamics CD-2COMP, Image Dynamics CX64, (2) Image Dynamics ID8V.2, Arc Audio 2100CXL, Arc Audio 4150CXL, Arc Audio 1500D-R

    2006 Kawasaki Ninja ZX14
    Quote Originally Posted by DJGTSR
    I dont mean to be rude, but what is the highest level of education that you finished?

  3. #3
    marleyskater420's Avatar
    marleyskater420 is offline Banned

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In the medium of life
    Age
    27
    Posts
    7,010
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    8
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmac
    Typically it's ...

    Diameter of speaker - 2*width of surround = Effective Diameter
    Effective Radius = Effective Diameter/2

    Then you punch it into the formula for calculating the area of a circle ...

    Pi*R^2

    So say you have a 18" speaker with a 1" surround, so you get 16" for effective diameter and 8" (20.32 cm) for effective radius.

    Pi*(20.32)^2 = 1297.17 cm^2
    k thanks.i get the piR^2 part.and the subtracting the surround..how do i get it into ^2 inches?cuz i need to figure out if its under 260 ^2inches(i think)or not




  4. #4
    Electrodynamic's Avatar
    Electrodynamic is offline Knows nothing



    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Mooresville, NC
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,064
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    1/3 of the surround is usually taken into consideration when you're doing your own SD figures.



    Electrodynamic
    "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate of everyone drops to zero."
    Owner Stereo Integrity
    Co-owner Obsidian Car Audio
    Associate Sundown Audio
    Simon Eichenberger is my hero
    Power handling is not a power requirement! Don't install suckage!

  5. #5
    marleyskater420's Avatar
    marleyskater420 is offline Banned

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In the medium of life
    Age
    27
    Posts
    7,010
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    8
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Quote Originally Posted by Electrodynamic
    1/3 of the surround is usually taken into consideration when you're doing your own SD figures.
    so then if the cone area is 16 1/2 i do 3.14x68=213 is that how many square inches there are?




  6. #6
    mattj's Avatar
    mattj is offline Resonant Engineering



    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    30
    Posts
    6,293
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    math math math!! I HATE MATH!



    (SUMMER)
    2001 Ford Mustang GT Premium
    Mach460
    Alpine CDA-9835
    KnuKonceptz Wiring


  7. #7
    Warbleed's Avatar
    Warbleed is offline @$$hole



    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    925
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmac
    Typically it's ...

    Diameter of speaker - 2*width of surround = Effective Diameter
    Effective Radius = Effective Diameter/2

    Then you punch it into the formula for calculating the area of a circle ...

    Pi*R^2

    So say you have a 18" speaker with a 1" surround, so you get 16" for effective diameter and 8" (20.32 cm) for effective radius.

    Pi*(20.32)^2 = 1297.17 cm^2
    It's not really that simple. You typically end up overestimating the cone area of the driver when you do it that way.

    We'll use the RE XXX 18 as an example. Now it is an 18" diameter driver, with a 1.5" wide surround.

    So using what you outlined above, we have a 15" effective diameter, and a 7.5" radius.

    Now that would of course lead us to believe that we have an Sd of about 177 in.^2 (1135cm^2).

    Now that figure is actually incorrect. When you actually measure, using the far more precise 1/3 surround method, which eliminates any ambiguity on where the surround actually starts.

    The actual measured Sd of the XXX 18 is 1095cm^2. Not a dramatic difference in this case (about 4%), but as I'll show next, it does make a difference.

    The next example is the Eclipse Ti 15. It has a 2" wide surround. So we have 11" to work with, radius of 5.5".

    We get an Sd of 95in.^2. This translates to about 613cm^2. The actual measured Sd is 650cm^2. That's about a 6% difference.

    Let's look at the Adire Audio Tempest. It has a 3/4" wide surround. So we have 13.5". Radius of 6.75".

    So we get an Sd of 143in.^2. This translates to 922cm^2. Pretty impressive.

    Now when we actually measure Sd, we get 780cm^2. Wow. That's about a 16.5% difference in Sd. That's fairly significant.

    Now why didn't the method work? Because the Tempest has the surround spaced away from the gasket, so it actually results in a much lower Sd than merely subtracting the surround width from the driver diameter would suggest.

    The method is reasonable, but I just want to make it clear that in many instances, it's not very accurate, because you aren't really being as specific as you should be, and the equation doesn't really account for things like that which I specified above.

    Hope that helped someone.




  8. #8
    marleyskater420's Avatar
    marleyskater420 is offline Banned

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In the medium of life
    Age
    27
    Posts
    7,010
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    8
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Quote Originally Posted by Warbleed
    It's not really that simple. You typically end up overestimating the cone area of the driver when you do it that way.

    We'll use the RE XXX 18 as an example. Now it is an 18" diameter driver, with a 1.5" wide surround.

    So using what you outlined above, we have a 15" effective diameter, and a 7.5" radius.

    Now that would of course lead us to believe that we have an Sd of about 177 in.^2 (1135cm^2).

    Now that figure is actually incorrect. When you actually measure, using the far more precise 1/3 surround method, which eliminates any ambiguity on where the surround actually starts.

    The actual measured Sd of the XXX 18 is 1095cm^2. Not a dramatic difference in this case (about 4%), but as I'll show next, it does make a difference.

    The next example is the Eclipse Ti 15. It has a 2" wide surround. So we have 11" to work with, radius of 5.5".

    We get an Sd of 95in.^2. This translates to about 613cm^2. The actual measured Sd is 650cm^2. That's about a 6% difference.

    Let's look at the Adire Audio Tempest. It has a 3/4" wide surround. So we have 13.5". Radius of 6.75".

    So we get an Sd of 143in.^2. This translates to 922cm^2. Pretty impressive.

    Now when we actually measure Sd, we get 780cm^2. Wow. That's about a 16.5% difference in Sd. That's fairly significant.

    Now why didn't the method work? Because the Tempest has the surround spaced away from the gasket, so it actually results in a much lower Sd than merely subtracting the surround width from the driver diameter would suggest.

    The method is reasonable, but I just want to make it clear that in many instances, it's not very accurate, because you aren't really being as specific as you should be, and the equation doesn't really account for things like that which I specified above.

    Hope that helped someone.
    thanks.that helped.




  9. #9
    Warbleed's Avatar
    Warbleed is offline @$$hole



    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    925
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    No problem, glad to be of assitance.




  10. #10
    Warbleed's Avatar
    Warbleed is offline @$$hole



    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Age
    32
    Posts
    925
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: sub cone area

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmac
    Any more accurate way of calculating it without being able to physically measure the speaker in person ?
    Honestly, just try and take a look at the driver, so you can get an idea if it's a situation like the Tempest.

    Otherwise just make sure to consider it a liberal estimate.




Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. dented speaker cone
    By Jbarbier in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-17-2003, 05:42 PM
  2. Spec sheet for old cone XXX
    By leomon in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-2003, 11:49 PM
  3. Looking for some 'shop' shows in my area
    By bigbassman in forum Car Audio Competition, Shows and Events
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-24-2003, 11:34 AM
  4. removing spray paint off the cone?
    By lickdeeznutz in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-20-2003, 04:49 PM
  5. Breaking in a flat cone
    By joshpoints in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2003, 04:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum