Closed Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Reload Thread: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

  1. #1
    rovertnamrod's Avatar
    rovertnamrod is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    i'm looking for some good sounding speakers for the front doors of my 01 civic coupe dx. these speakers are roughly the same price- $159 for the ID's and $150 for the Alpine components. the alpine type r component speakers are Alpine's high end comps, while the ctx 65cs is not Image Dynamics high end comp's.

    which sound better and why?







  2. #2
    zako's Avatar
    zako is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)





  3. #3
    rovertnamrod's Avatar
    rovertnamrod is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    Harsh tweeters? They both have silk domes though.




  4. #4
    zako's Avatar
    zako is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    Quote Originally Posted by rovertnamrod View Post
    Harsh tweeters? They both have silk domes though.
    Tweeter harshness doesn't need to do anything with the materials. Frequently, a tweeter can sound harsh at higher volume level if it is allowed to play too low. So, it can easily be a crossover problem. One rule of thumb I heard is that tweeter's output should be completely in-audible at its resonance frequency. I heard it has been said that few small format tweeters do not distort playing audibly at frequencies below 4KHz, but in car audio there are a lot of speakers crossing tweeters as low as 2KHz or using 1st order high pass which still let the tweeter play a lot of lower frequencies.




  5. #5
    rovertnamrod's Avatar
    rovertnamrod is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    ok, i understand the JBL's sound better than the alpines and the id's, but which out of the 2 I originally asked about would sound better? Alpine type r components (spr 50c, spr 60) or Image Dynamics ctx65cs components?




  6. #6
    Why So Cereal?'s Avatar
    Why So Cereal? is offline Invisible Cereal



    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Drowning in milk
    Posts
    7,403
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    Quote Originally Posted by rovertnamrod View Post
    ok, i understand the JBL's sound better than the alpines and the id's, but which out of the 2 I originally asked about would sound better? Alpine type r components (spr 50c, spr 60) or Image Dynamics ctx65cs components?
    I vote ID. I dont like R comps. Highs too emphasized even for me.




  7. #7
    rovertnamrod's Avatar
    rovertnamrod is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    ok i'm going with the JBL ms-52c and not the ms-62c because of fitment issues with my car (2001 honda civic dx coupe). The ms-52c's are just as good as the ms-62c's right? and the only difference being they don't go quite as low on the frequency range?




  8. #8
    neo_styles's Avatar
    neo_styles is offline AKA Pop Twidget



    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Porter Ranch, CA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,613
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)

    Re: Image dynamics ctx 65cs vs Alpine type r comp's (spr 50c, 60c)

    The MS52s will be fine. I have MS62s and they're solid performers. I'm going to be installing them in my Passat tomorrow, so keep your eyes peeled on a build log soon. Between your two original choices, definitely the IDs...they're also nowhere near as power hungry.



    Deck: JVC KD-A95BT
    Speakers: PHD FB mid, JBL MS tweets
    Amps: Boston Acoustics GT-2125, Zed Minotaur III (x2)
    Sub: 10" SSA ICON, IA Death Penalty 18" (coming soon)
    Starr Mountain Sound Nuthugger #2 (I'm a #2 lol)
    dcarcustoms Nuthugger #1
    Spotify: http://open.spotify.com/user/neo_styles/playlist/6t9ru42j0wbEsuo4bXqXD8
    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM VERTEX

Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-10-2012, 09:27 AM
  2. 10" Image Dynamics ctx subs. vs. jl audio 13w1v2
    By AARON30 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2010, 05:25 PM
  3. polk momos vs alpine type r comps
    By king ranch in forum Speakers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-30-2008, 03:41 AM
  4. JL XR's vs Alpine Type X comps
    By MisterGrubbs in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-23-2005, 11:41 PM
  5. mtx8000 vs alpine type r
    By sk8board4life86 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-05-2002, 05:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum