Closed Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 43 of 43

Reload Thread: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

  1. #31
    Flex68's Avatar
    Flex68 is offline dilligaf



    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Backroads
    Posts
    1,613
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoptologist View Post
    I'm looking to stay under $700, so from HAT, that would give me the Clarus C61-2. What do you guys think?
    Follow the advice given about checking your current install and playing with all settings before dropping in another set...but if/when you do, you can save about half of that $700 by going used



    Quote Originally Posted by Spider Monkey View Post
    Romney will [fornicate] me less than Obama already has and WAY less than what Obama has planned.
    Refs: adamtwo4, basscort2009, burzendowski, clanassa, cthedinger, ikoolguy, its_bacon12, Jew_Bagel, jr711, kreapin, kowboy, Rudy, TheRealDefman, Winter_C

    HU:Eclipse CD7200 MkII
    Subs: Fack Skar Audio
    Front comps: HAT Clarus C61-2 off Sony ES 7547
    Electrical: C&D batt, Big 3 with 1/0, 4ga to amps, Stinger RCA’s
    Damping: 60mil FG panels over holes, full worx from SDS




  2. #32
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Thanks everyone for the awesome advice.

    Quote Originally Posted by keep_hope_alive View Post
    Hands down, if the MLK-165 are not the smoothest, most natural speaker system, your install needs attention.

    They are capable of so much midbass, you can run them without a sub. But the install is key. They are revealing, and like reference monitors.

    This is how to install them:
    http://forum.sounddomain.com/ubbthre...page/0/fpart/1
    We have $600 in vehicle treatments and over 100 hours in install.

    The tweeters can be silly smooth, if you install them correctly.

    The problems you are having are not the speakers, and any drop in replacements can have the same issues. Share pics of the install, speaker mounting, etc.

    You can spend a grand on new speakers, and they won't help Poorly mixed music sound better.

    You can buy speakers with more midrange distortion (most do) and maybe that would help your perception.
    I went through the thread in your link, and wow. Is the reason the owner is using the MLK crossovers because he wanted to power the rears on the same amp? The only deadening I have done in my car is the trunk and 2 front doors. My whole car rattles, it sux. When I get the new car I'll invest a huge chunk of money into deadening the entire thing.




  3. #33
    shadow's Avatar
    shadow is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Dallas,Texas
    Posts
    242
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Thx Brah... Means a lot to hear that from someone who "gets it"....
    I can't tell ya how much gas I've burned up just set'n in the drive way listening to my system and fall'n asleep..lol
    It's just so... peaceful to me...
    Quote Originally Posted by audiobaun View Post
    I can sit back and listen to your system all day long man..sounds amazing!Jelly isnt the word




  4. #34
    ejschultz's Avatar
    ejschultz is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Schererville, IN
    Posts
    2,952
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Quote Originally Posted by shadow View Post
    Right and???
    Exactly.



    94 Caprice Classic LS: DEH-P800PRS, TS-C720PRS, MRV-F545, MRD-M1005, 2 Fi X 12s in 2.5 net cubes sealed; 97 Grand Cherokee TSi: CDA-9855, TS-D1720C, MRV-F345, MRD-M605, SWX-1043D in .54 net cubes sealed




    Resident Jeep Expert, Mother Fucker

  5. #35
    keep_hope_alive's Avatar
    keep_hope_alive is offline Acoustics Engineer keep_hope_alive is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities, IL
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    28
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoptologist View Post
    Thanks everyone for the awesome advice.



    I went through the thread in your link, and wow. Is the reason the owner is using the MLK crossovers because he wanted to power the rears on the same amp? The only deadening I have done in my car is the trunk and 2 front doors. My whole car rattles, it sux. When I get the new car I'll invest a huge chunk of money into deadening the entire thing.
    yes, we are using the crossovers so he can run the rears. T/A on his rears adjust and depth the height of the sound stage. they are ran bandpass. the passive crossovers are really nice with the MLK, they add filters to help the tweeter overall. i recommend you do the following before you try swapping.

    1. go back to running passive but now bridge the amp for 4x as much power.
    2. don't just deaden the doors - seal them. the link shows you how. do that and you'll gain midbass. we ran the MLK without sealing the holes (but with a lot of deadener) and midbass was lacking due to phase interference. the door panel rattled also. sealed the doors and wow, what a difference. foam around the front of the woofer to seal to the door panel is also key. midbass requires mass and seals.
    3. change how the tweeters are aimed and try to work in the deeper chamber. this will mean custom tweeter pods/spheres. the difference will be amazing and you'll get the smoothness you want.
    4. add deadener as required to control resonance and add 1/8" CCF to control buzzes.

    buying different speakers is a waste of money until you get the vehicle treated acoustically.

    one thing that i have seen over 20 years is that speaker placement/aiming & airspace/enclosure (control of back wave) are vital to proper performance - regardless of how much you spend on them.



    have you been helped by me? i'd love to know. shoot me a PM.

    My 2014 Accord build log: http://mobileaudioforum.com/forum/showthread.php?6722-KHA-2014-Accord-Sport-SQ-Factory-Integration
    *My 2001 Accord build log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/536049-2001-accord-ex-sedan-its-long.html
    *2005 Scion tC Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/516096-2005-scion-tc-sq-hertz-audison-pioneer-build-log.html
    *1998 Astro Van Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/567468-kha-does-spl-build-1996-astro-van.html

  6. #36
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Quote Originally Posted by keep_hope_alive View Post
    yes, we are using the crossovers so he can run the rears. T/A on his rears adjust and depth the height of the sound stage. they are ran bandpass. the passive crossovers are really nice with the MLK, they add filters to help the tweeter overall. i recommend you do the following before you try swapping.

    1. go back to running passive but now bridge the amp for 4x as much power.
    2. don't just deaden the doors - seal them. the link shows you how. do that and you'll gain midbass. we ran the MLK without sealing the holes (but with a lot of deadener) and midbass was lacking due to phase interference. the door panel rattled also. sealed the doors and wow, what a difference. foam around the front of the woofer to seal to the door panel is also key. midbass requires mass and seals.
    3. change how the tweeters are aimed and try to work in the deeper chamber. this will mean custom tweeter pods/spheres. the difference will be amazing and you'll get the smoothness you want.
    4. add deadener as required to control resonance and add 1/8" CCF to control buzzes.

    buying different speakers is a waste of money until you get the vehicle treated acoustically.

    one thing that i have seen over 20 years is that speaker placement/aiming & airspace/enclosure (control of back wave) are vital to proper performance - regardless of how much you spend on them.
    1. I didn't think the Audison LRX 5.1k could be bridged?
    2. I'll have to recheck the doors, I feel like when they were first installed the midbass was much nicer, maybe the deadening has peeled off in places (due to heat), because I do hear some rattlings/resonance now. I Also will try adding the foam around the front of the speaker, good tip.
    3. Using the larger chambers is something I've always wanted to do. I will be sure to use them in the new car. It sounds like you are pretty confident they will make a difference.




  7. #37
    keep_hope_alive's Avatar
    keep_hope_alive is offline Acoustics Engineer keep_hope_alive is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities, IL
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    28
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    You have the 5.1k also? Sorry, I missed that. Instead of full active, try bi-amp through the crossovers, at least for the tweeter inputs/outputs.

    I am confident that improving mounting/aiming will make a difference.



    have you been helped by me? i'd love to know. shoot me a PM.

    My 2014 Accord build log: http://mobileaudioforum.com/forum/showthread.php?6722-KHA-2014-Accord-Sport-SQ-Factory-Integration
    *My 2001 Accord build log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/536049-2001-accord-ex-sedan-its-long.html
    *2005 Scion tC Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/516096-2005-scion-tc-sq-hertz-audison-pioneer-build-log.html
    *1998 Astro Van Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/567468-kha-does-spl-build-1996-astro-van.html

  8. #38
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Quote Originally Posted by keep_hope_alive View Post
    You have the 5.1k also? Sorry, I missed that. Instead of full active, try bi-amp through the crossovers, at least for the tweeter inputs/outputs.

    I am confident that improving mounting/aiming will make a difference.
    I'll try to post some pics of my current setup tomorrow-ish. My crossovers aren't in my car anymore, not sure how to install them back in, would have to have installer do that, maybe I'll try in the new car. I want to take my door panel off and see how it's looking underneath, but I've never done that before. Is it relatively easy? And once again, your work looks killer, I wish I could do all that.




  9. #39
    keep_hope_alive's Avatar
    keep_hope_alive is offline Acoustics Engineer keep_hope_alive is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities, IL
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    28
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    installing crossovers is easy, just do it near the amp, move the speaker wires from the amp outputs to the crossover outputs. run new wires from the amp outputs to the crossover inputs. just be careful to not mix up wiring for woofers and tweeters!!!

    removing door panels is also easy. there are usually a few screws (typical locations are at the door handle (sometimes behind a removable panel), at the arm rest, and sometimes along the bottom). you typically remove the sail panel cover first, then door handle screw/cover, arm rest screw and window/door lock/control panel. the panel will pop off with clips from there, with a few wire harnesses you need to undo. once free, lift up as it hooks on the window ledge. be careful not to poke the woofer with the door panel.

    you can find forums for your specific make/model that tell/show you exactly how to remove the panel.

    none of this is "hard", it's just time consuming. you need to devote time to your install if you want it to sound good. money is always a factor, but time should be limitless. stay off the internet, don't watch TV, don't play games, don't sleep so much, just work on the car. most of my build was between 11pm-3am after the wife and kids went to sleep. Advocare Spark has helped me combat a lack of sleep while maintaining a high level of cognitive performance at work. kids steal sleep from you anyway, i just took advantage of the habit.



    have you been helped by me? i'd love to know. shoot me a PM.

    My 2014 Accord build log: http://mobileaudioforum.com/forum/showthread.php?6722-KHA-2014-Accord-Sport-SQ-Factory-Integration
    *My 2001 Accord build log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/536049-2001-accord-ex-sedan-its-long.html
    *2005 Scion tC Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/516096-2005-scion-tc-sq-hertz-audison-pioneer-build-log.html
    *1998 Astro Van Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/567468-kha-does-spl-build-1996-astro-van.html

  10. #40
    keep_hope_alive's Avatar
    keep_hope_alive is offline Acoustics Engineer keep_hope_alive is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities, IL
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    28
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    you could show your installer the Scion tC build and say "I want that".



    have you been helped by me? i'd love to know. shoot me a PM.

    My 2014 Accord build log: http://mobileaudioforum.com/forum/showthread.php?6722-KHA-2014-Accord-Sport-SQ-Factory-Integration
    *My 2001 Accord build log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/536049-2001-accord-ex-sedan-its-long.html
    *2005 Scion tC Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/516096-2005-scion-tc-sq-hertz-audison-pioneer-build-log.html
    *1998 Astro Van Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/567468-kha-does-spl-build-1996-astro-van.html

  11. #41
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Been busy this week with school, have a bunch of free time right now but no camera to take pics. Still tossing around the idea of getting different speakers.

    I have however been listening to music this week with my subwoofer off, and I must say the Hertz MLK do put out pretty nice bass, although I hear a bunch of resonance/vibrations so I'm sure I could get even better output with more work. I have been playing with my EQ too, kind of fun seeing which bands effect which sounds in my songs.

    Still seems like something is too bright or too detailed or revealing, I suppose a processor could fix that, which I am also looking into.

    I've been reading threads comparing Hertz to Morel and HAT, seems like HAT's smoothest/laidback tweeter is the L1 Pro R2, read that all their other ones are more on the bright/revealing side. Can't find any MSRP prices for Morel. Going to try and get more opinions on these 3 speaker lineups. New car might be here sooner than expected.




  12. #42
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Got my new car, been listening to the stock sound system for the last couple days.

    This is going to sound absolutely crazy, but I think I like the sound of the Accord more than the MLK 165's. The highs are ridiculously smooth, I played several songs pretty loud that would normally give me the onset of fatigueness with the MLK's, and I just felt like I could listen to them forever.

    The Accord has tweets installed on the dash facing upward right next to the windshield. Sounds more laid back (less hot/sharp) compared to the MLK165's. Sounds fuller/richer as well. The only things I noticed was that the mids sounded muddy on a few songs at higher volumes, less extension overall, less detail, but the fullness and richness make up for it.

    So I may sell the MLK's and go with something else after all, unless using the large chambers would really make a huge difference and give me the mellow/more laid-back sound I love.
    Last edited by Hoptologist; 09-22-2012 at 05:32 AM.




  13. #43
    Hoptologist's Avatar
    Hoptologist is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Upgrade / Sidegrade from Hertz MLK 165

    Thought I should update this thread...

    After only driving the Accord around for a couple weeks, I decided to drive the car with the MLK 165's around for a couple days. I couldn't believe how awesome they sounded again lol. If I had to use one word to describe the difference, it would be fidelity. Instruments in songs are much more pronounced and easier to identify/recognize (better imaging). It almost felt like going from a boom-box in the Accord, to headphones with the MLK 165's. Or going from a tape player to CD player ...hard to describe for me. I even turned down the gain a little more on the tweets and obtained the sweet, laid back sound I like. They are still a little too detailed/revealing for my optimum liking, and I'm sure that's what others love about them, but it almost makes me hear the flaws in a lot of my favorite songs more than just hearing the song as a whole.

    Anyways, I've decided I'm going to sell them and try something new/different. Either HAT Clarus, or HAT L3SE and L6 mid, not sure if I can fit the L3SE yet. I also want to try Morels and Dynaudio's in the future, but one step at a time. I'll also be changing out my IDMAX for either a DD 2500 or Arc Audio Black.

    I've loved my IDMAX + Hertz MLK 165 setup for the past few years, but I've been itching to mix things up. New car, new equipment, new sound. Thanks everyone.




Closed Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. hertz mlk 165 vs hertz m2
    By gamecock guru in forum Speakers
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-27-2010, 02:47 AM
  2. Hertz MLK 165
    By kramster in forum Speakers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-19-2007, 01:36 PM
  3. Morel Supremo Vs Hertz Mlk 165
    By DIPKICK88 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-05-2007, 12:03 PM
  4. Morel Supremo Vs Hertz Mlk 165
    By DIPKICK88 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 03:17 PM
  5. Morel Supremo Vs Hertz Mlk 165
    By DIPKICK88 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 07:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum