Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Reload Thread: Active or passive?

  1. #1
    Sq-NoOb's Avatar
    Sq-NoOb is offline Member



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Active or passive?

    going to be running focal 165vr3's in the front on a polk 500.4 amp focal 100vrs in the rear on a polk 200.4 also run though a RF 360.2....my question is would running these componenets active or passive be best? and how to wire an active set up?







  2. #2
    fasfocus00's Avatar
    fasfocus00 is offline doITdaWHITEwayORdoITtwice



    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    5,431
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    364 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    why do ppl ask this, an active crossover and passive crossover do the same thing. yeah there are some crossovers that have a couple more features but that's really it. No real benefit from one over the other, it's mainly just personal preference.

    BTW I run active in my front stage b/c I broke the crossovers and passive in the rear. also if someone is going to give some BS sound quality argument go check out a nice set of HT towers and see if it's active.



    Here is my feedback Thread: http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showth...ght=fasfocus00

    "If you ain't cheatin', You ain't trying"

  3. #3
    Sq-NoOb's Avatar
    Sq-NoOb is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    o i wasnt even clear of the difference...but could you tell a diff in your front stages after switching to active?




  4. #4
    ciaonzo's Avatar
    ciaonzo is offline TheContinental



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    WI
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,235
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    549 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by fasfocus00 View Post
    why do ppl ask this, an active crossover and passive crossover do the same thing. No real benefit from one over the other, it's mainly just personal preference.
    Please do some reading and report back.

    Active Crossovers Vs. Passive Crossovers



    Quote Originally Posted by audioholic View Post
    Saying "clipping doesn't kill speakers" is a half-truth at best. Technically no, clipping itself does not hurt the speaker. But in clipping your amp, you can easily create a situation that WILL kill the speaker. Was the squared waveform the DIRECT cause of the failure? No. In the end, the answer is, always has been, and can only be... heat kills speakers. BUT, clipping increases heat generation, sometimes by a drastic amount. So to start a thread simply to state that clipping does not hurt speakers is, again, a half-truth at best.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bean town Ohio
    Posts
    47
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    id go active streaming right into the amp for the simple reason that ic can be adjusted much easier...just my two cents




  6. #6
    fasfocus00's Avatar
    fasfocus00 is offline doITdaWHITEwayORdoITtwice



    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    5,431
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    364 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by ciaonzo View Post
    Please do some reading and report back.

    Active Crossovers Vs. Passive Crossovers
    so you are telling me that passive crossovers should not be used?



    Here is my feedback Thread: http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showth...ght=fasfocus00

    "If you ain't cheatin', You ain't trying"

  7. #7
    ciaonzo's Avatar
    ciaonzo is offline TheContinental



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    WI
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,235
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    549 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by fasfocus00 View Post
    so you are telling me that passive crossovers should not be used?
    I have no idea how you managed to interpret it that way. Not in so many words, you stated there was no difference between using passive elements after amplification and active elements before amplification. I simply suggested that you might consider reading a little before you perpetuate any further misinformation.



    Quote Originally Posted by audioholic View Post
    Saying "clipping doesn't kill speakers" is a half-truth at best. Technically no, clipping itself does not hurt the speaker. But in clipping your amp, you can easily create a situation that WILL kill the speaker. Was the squared waveform the DIRECT cause of the failure? No. In the end, the answer is, always has been, and can only be... heat kills speakers. BUT, clipping increases heat generation, sometimes by a drastic amount. So to start a thread simply to state that clipping does not hurt speakers is, again, a half-truth at best.

  8. #8
    Sq-NoOb's Avatar
    Sq-NoOb is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    ok, it sounds like active is the way to go i guess, i have a slight wireing issue tho, since im useing 3-ways up front and only have a 4channel running them how could i wire in the tweeters, i know i deff want the woofer and mid on each side run to the amp (useing up the 4 channels)




  9. #9
    BlackMaxima's Avatar
    BlackMaxima is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    852
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by ciaonzo View Post
    i have no idea how you managed to interpret it that way. Not in so many words, you stated there was no difference between using passive elements after amplification and active elements before amplification. I simply suggested that you might consider reading a little before you perpetuate any further misinformation.


    x2



    References: ME,







    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYCORNUTS18 View Post
    the JL 500/1 is good and JL actually puts out like 185% so that would be good
    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalohed View Post
    My mom is the ultimate SPL woofer.
    Cheapest too.
    Quote Originally Posted by dpom View Post
    i was wondering if this site was legit, im not sure if im allowed to post it or not so let me know if i can.
    (www.caraudio.com)

  10. #10
    Blue Fury's Avatar
    Blue Fury is offline Quagmire's Chin



    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fresno Area, Ca
    Posts
    2,358
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    56 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    why do it when you're buying a set? You're likely to use the same points at the passive ones use, so why the extra work?



    ***My build: 2 SSA Xcons, Sundown, Vifa, TB, Hertz, 880prs, etc.***
    http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=359675

    CA Refs: bought from: Jacka, bones22, civicman07, Zeuslicious, 90accordman, DesertDawg(<---EXCELLENT seller), mclerico83
    Sold to: 97accordalpine, Jgyolai, brenTgrillzem, nicksredline, lantz, bagged97tacoma, Plottin4success, microhaxo, pinoy2o9, LaserRed38
    ROE Refs: Bought from delvryboy, jnralp00, dcmcki, Mxman38, Excessive Amperage, GoinDef154, blackdragonx118, Assman.

    Currently For sale: Everything

  11. #11
    fasfocus00's Avatar
    fasfocus00 is offline doITdaWHITEwayORdoITtwice



    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    5,431
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    364 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by ciaonzo View Post
    I have no idea how you managed to interpret it that way. Not in so many words, you stated there was no difference between using passive elements after amplification and active elements before amplification. I simply suggested that you might consider reading a little before you perpetuate any further misinformation.
    there is no real difference especially audible difference between the 2. using an active crossover or passive crossover is really just personal preference. the difference between the 2 are very minimal much less audible to the human ear. if the difference was that huge, all high end home theatre systems would use active systems. by telling me to read that article, the writer (and I assumed you b/c you referenced it) are biased towards active crossover networks.



    Here is my feedback Thread: http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showth...ght=fasfocus00

    "If you ain't cheatin', You ain't trying"

  12. #12
    Blue Fury's Avatar
    Blue Fury is offline Quagmire's Chin



    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fresno Area, Ca
    Posts
    2,358
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    56 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by fasfocus00 View Post
    there is no real difference especially audible difference between the 2. using an active crossover or passive crossover is really just personal preference. the difference between the 2 are very minimal much less audible to the human ear. if the difference was that huge, all high end home theatre systems would use active systems. by telling me to read that article, the writer (and I assumed you b/c you referenced it) are biased towards active crossover networks.
    I wouldn't stop there unless you want to sound obvious... it should be clear to you that they may be biased from experience (a pretty good reason).



    ***My build: 2 SSA Xcons, Sundown, Vifa, TB, Hertz, 880prs, etc.***
    http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=359675

    CA Refs: bought from: Jacka, bones22, civicman07, Zeuslicious, 90accordman, DesertDawg(<---EXCELLENT seller), mclerico83
    Sold to: 97accordalpine, Jgyolai, brenTgrillzem, nicksredline, lantz, bagged97tacoma, Plottin4success, microhaxo, pinoy2o9, LaserRed38
    ROE Refs: Bought from delvryboy, jnralp00, dcmcki, Mxman38, Excessive Amperage, GoinDef154, blackdragonx118, Assman.

    Currently For sale: Everything

  13. #13
    Sq-NoOb's Avatar
    Sq-NoOb is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Fury View Post
    why do it when you're buying a set? You're likely to use the same points at the passive ones use, so why the extra work?
    so, i should just go passive?




  14. #14
    ciaonzo's Avatar
    ciaonzo is offline TheContinental



    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    WI
    Age
    39
    Posts
    9,235
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    549 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by fasfocus00 View Post
    there is no real difference especially audible difference between the 2. using an active crossover or passive crossover is really just personal preference. the difference between the 2 are very minimal much less audible to the human ear. if the difference was that huge, all high end home theatre systems would use active systems. by telling me to read that article, the writer (and I assumed you b/c you referenced it) are biased towards active crossover networks.
    I chose that article because it came to mind quickly, and I thought others who were interested in this topic might benefit from it and possibly start seeking more information for themselves instead of letting people on this site fill their heads.

    So you truly believe that there's no real advantage, either audible or measurable, to having the voice coil connected directly to the amplifier circuit rather than going through yet another series of reactive elements (inductors, resistors, and capacitors - Oh my!) before the voice coil (obviously also reactive) is connected to the amplifier circuit? I'm not trying to get down on you man, but if you believe that, you would benefit from further reading.

    And simply because I wish to call you out on a particular topic, doesn't mean it's wise for you to assume that I have a bias toward one or the other. I regularly build my own passive networks and I believe both passive and active filters have their place and purpose, concerning both cost and performance. Either approach can potentially surpass the other where cost is involved, depending on what direction you wish to take things. There are very few, if any, passive networks that could potentially surpass the performance of an active setup when everything is done correctly. That's not including the massive flexibility that's inherent to an active setup.

    See, with that you can now begin to assume that I may favor one over the other.



    Quote Originally Posted by audioholic View Post
    Saying "clipping doesn't kill speakers" is a half-truth at best. Technically no, clipping itself does not hurt the speaker. But in clipping your amp, you can easily create a situation that WILL kill the speaker. Was the squared waveform the DIRECT cause of the failure? No. In the end, the answer is, always has been, and can only be... heat kills speakers. BUT, clipping increases heat generation, sometimes by a drastic amount. So to start a thread simply to state that clipping does not hurt speakers is, again, a half-truth at best.

  15. #15
    JimJ's Avatar
    JimJ is offline Tangled Up in Blue



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hillsborough, NC
    Posts
    31,683
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    74 Post(s)

    Re: Active or passive?

    Quote Originally Posted by fasfocus00 View Post
    there is no real difference especially audible difference between the 2. using an active crossover or passive crossover is really just personal preference. the difference between the 2 are very minimal much less audible to the human ear. if the difference was that huge, all high end home theatre systems would use active systems. by telling me to read that article, the writer (and I assumed you b/c you referenced it) are biased towards active crossover networks.
    While I agree that there's no sonic difference between the two set up identically, the issue in a car is how much flexibility you have in adjustment...cars **** acoustically, so designing a fixed crossover and expecting the best results out of it for every car isn't going to happen.

    also if someone is going to give some BS sound quality argument go check out a nice set of HT towers and see if it's active.
    Not exactly sure what you mean by that, as I can think of plenty of designs at home that are actively bi-amped. Most large horn setups are bi-amped, as the L-pads for the 110dB/W horns would have to be huge to compensate for typical midbasses.




Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum