Closed Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Reload Thread: Is passive better for my application?

  1. #1
    ovalevader's Avatar
    ovalevader is offline Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Is passive better for my application?

    So far my setup consists of an aq3500d, HDC310(s), and a DD C4a for highs. I'm looking for a highs/mids setup to compliment my sub stage. SQ isn't a huge issue at high volumes, but I would like to be able to turn it down and get decent SQ. I've been reading the forums for a few months now and have come up with a couple solutions:

    1) Active setup. 2x sets of 4 ohm mids, running parallel to a 2 ohm load, with 1 set of tweeters at a 4 ohm load. This will put 150 watts to the mids, and 100 watts to the tweets.

    2) Active setup. same as above but with 2 sets of tweets running the same wattage as the mids

    3) Passive setup. 2 sets of components running of each set of channels.

    4) Passive setup. Bridge the amp, presenting 300 x 2 at 4 ohms to one set of components.

    My budget is around 500 for all the speakers.

    So, which of these setups would you run (if any) with what kind of speakers?







  2. #2
    Trey803's Avatar
    Trey803 is offline GAMECOCKS



    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    5,637
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    29 Post(s)

    Re: Is passive better for my application?

    turning it down will not increase the sound quality.......unless you are clipping the signal which should not be happening



    HU: DEH-80PRS
    Doors Deadened
    Front Stage: Rainbow SLC 265
    Front Stage Amp: Image Dynamics i2600
    Sub: Dayton RSS210HF-4 8"
    Sub Amp: Image Dynamics i2300
    Wire: Knu

  3. #3
    ovalevader's Avatar
    ovalevader is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Is passive better for my application?

    Ok, with that being said I guess sound quality at all volumes is relatively important.



    '09 FA5 Civic SI
    Optima yellow top
    ARC KS300.4 and KS1000.1
    Fi Q 15
    JBL MS-8
    Boston SPZ60

  4. #4
    linksyz's Avatar
    linksyz is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Age
    29
    Posts
    374
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Is passive better for my application?

    I have the same question... I bought Focal 165 K2P and I'll be running it off of Alpine PDX 4.150. Any input would be nice

    By the way, another caraudio local member has the same speakers set up as #4 and they sound beautiful



    2008 Nissan 350Z

    Alpine CDA-9887
    Focal 165 K2P
    DLS Iridium 10"
    Alpine PDX 4.150
    Alpine PDX 1.600

Closed Thread

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum