Closed Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Reload Thread: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

  1. #1
    spencer321's Avatar
    spencer321 is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    palm bay
    Posts
    1,691
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    simple question the LPG aluminum tweets vs the seas neo aluminum tweets, general opinions, they are very close in price im curious how they sound tho. Low end extension crispness crossover points personal experiences etc.

    all reviews and opinions are greatly appreciated







  2. #2
    FoxPro5's Avatar
    FoxPro5 is offline Causal wanderer



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    3 octaves higher
    Posts
    5,449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    My ears say....

    LPG - more body, not as "bright" and a tad smoother down lower
    Seas - more "icy" sounding, maybe a bit more detailed up high

    All depends on install.

    Forcing any compact dome down too low to meet a midrange isn't a very wise idea. For that, you'd need a large format. Tweeters don't have low end extension. Make sure you have a spare set if you're going to aggressively test it.

    Easy answer: buy both and return the ones you don't like. Madisound has a pretty liberal return policy as long as you don't damage them at all.



    TEAM Front Fill

    The Fox audiomobile now sounds more quality thanks to SDS power.

    The most expensive solution is the one that doesn't do the job correctly. ~ Me

  3. #3
    spencer321's Avatar
    spencer321 is offline CarAudio.com Elite

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    palm bay
    Posts
    1,691
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxPro5 View Post
    My ears say....

    LPG - more body, not as "bright" and a tad smoother down lower
    Seas - more "icy" sounding, maybe a bit more detailed up high

    All depends on install.

    Forcing any compact dome down too low to meet a midrange isn't a very wise idea. For that, you'd need a large format. Tweeters don't have low end extension. Make sure you have a spare set if you're going to aggressively test it.

    Easy answer: buy both and return the ones you don't like. Madisound has a pretty liberal return policy as long as you don't damage them at all.
    im planning to pair them up with some ID oems, so crossover point in question is approx 2.5k

    when i said low end extension i was trying to say how low can you safely cross them without distortion or risk or blowing them up, just bad choice of phrasing.




  4. #4
    FoxPro5's Avatar
    FoxPro5 is offline Causal wanderer



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    3 octaves higher
    Posts
    5,449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by spencer321 View Post
    im planning to pair them up with some ID oems, so crossover point in question is approx 2.5k

    when i said low end extension i was trying to say how low can you safely cross them without distortion or risk or blowing them up, just bad choice of phrasing.
    The thing about running speakers active is that you may or may not LIKE that 2.5k xover point. Key word: like. Just because it's able to play that high, doesn't mean it will sound best crossed there in your audio system. My sub can probably play flat to 125 hz, but sounds best at 40 hz in my system. If you're running a 3-way active system, then you're essentialy trying to get at least 5 people to talk to you in a coheisve manner.

    This why a lot of people go through driver after driver IMO because they don't understand that your car will determine all that stuff, really. It's all about your car, man.



    TEAM Front Fill

    The Fox audiomobile now sounds more quality thanks to SDS power.

    The most expensive solution is the one that doesn't do the job correctly. ~ Me

  5. #5
    spencer321's Avatar
    spencer321 is offline CarAudio.com Elite

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    palm bay
    Posts
    1,691
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    its a truck and i just wanna get it right the first time cuz to be specific i don't have the funds to change setup after setup, the understand theres quite a few people running the ID oem mids with the seas neo tweets but i read somewhere that someone prefered the LPG's so i did a little reading saw that they were somewhat similiar and thought i'd ask to see if anyone had experience with both. Yeah i originally wanted to go 3 way active but i was told that 3 way for a first active setup would be a nightmare to get right and 2 way was easier to start with and ad a dedicated midrange later if possible.




  6. #6
    OCURIEL's Avatar
    OCURIEL is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    656
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Lpg is not a bad choice. Many mounting options. Pretty detailed & smooth. Reasonable price.

    Need to be crossed over higher then 3k though.

    A really good choice IMO.

    Can't comment on the Seas. Have not heard them yet.




  7. #7
    spencer321's Avatar
    spencer321 is offline CarAudio.com Elite

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    palm bay
    Posts
    1,691
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by OCURIEL View Post
    Lpg is not a bad choice. Many mounting options. Pretty detailed & smooth. Reasonable price.

    Need to be crossed over higher then 3k though.

    A really good choice IMO.

    Can't comment on the Seas. Have not heard them yet.
    well one of my issues is im not sure how comfortably the ID mids will player above 2.5k, ive heard everything from 2k to 2.5k as the "sweet spot" for them so... 2 ways are a pain in the *** to match up, there don't seem to be alot of options for mids that still pack a punch in the 80hz-200hz area but still play up into the 2k region and im having trouble finding tweets that are reasonably priced that play comfortably below 2k hz other than horns




  8. #8
    tcguy85's Avatar
    tcguy85 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hyde Park, NY
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,527
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by spencer321 View Post
    well one of my issues is im not sure how comfortably the ID mids will player above 2.5k, ive heard everything from 2k to 2.5k as the "sweet spot" for them so... 2 ways are a pain in the *** to match up, there don't seem to be alot of options for mids that still pack a punch in the 80hz-200hz area but still play up into the 2k region and im having trouble finding tweets that are reasonably priced that play comfortably below 2k hz other than horns
    the whole problem with 2 ways is that the mids are usually so far off-axis that the top end response gets a little screwy. it's not the mids themselves but usually the install.



    07 Scion tC: 880PRS, ID OEM 6.5" mids, Seas neo alum tweets, DD S4 and DD C2a amps, Dayton Ref H.O. 10(.7net, tuned to 30hz)

    HT: Samsung PN58B560 - 80gig PS3 - Yamaha RX-V2500 - Infinity Alpha 50 mains - Alpha center - Harmon Kardon HKB6 rears, Epik Sentinel & ED eQ.2.

  9. #9
    FoxPro5's Avatar
    FoxPro5 is offline Causal wanderer



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    3 octaves higher
    Posts
    5,449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by tcguy85 View Post
    the whole problem with 2 ways is that the mids are usually so far off-axis that the top end response gets a little screwy. it's not the mids themselves but usually the install.
    That's a great point, too.

    I'd also mention that if you do get them on axis then you're also going to deal with them thinning out [beaming] up high. IIRC, a smaller cone driver will beam less than a larger cone...which is all the more reason to run either a passive 3-way set up front or just go for the gusto and run the whole thing actively.



    TEAM Front Fill

    The Fox audiomobile now sounds more quality thanks to SDS power.

    The most expensive solution is the one that doesn't do the job correctly. ~ Me

  10. #10
    tcguy85's Avatar
    tcguy85 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Hyde Park, NY
    Age
    29
    Posts
    3,527
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxPro5 View Post
    That's a great point, too.

    I'd also mention that if you do get them on axis then you're also going to deal with them thinning out [beaming] up high. IIRC, a smaller cone driver will beam less than a larger cone...which is all the more reason to run either a passive 3-way set up front or just go for the gusto and run the whole thing actively.
    yup. i need mid-ranges aimed more on axis to take care of my 800-2.5k range, but whatever. i'm done with my install and things are staying the way they are, at least for quite a while. need to pay off the bills for what i already have, so no more spending money on the car install.

    now the HT.... thats another story.



    07 Scion tC: 880PRS, ID OEM 6.5" mids, Seas neo alum tweets, DD S4 and DD C2a amps, Dayton Ref H.O. 10(.7net, tuned to 30hz)

    HT: Samsung PN58B560 - 80gig PS3 - Yamaha RX-V2500 - Infinity Alpha 50 mains - Alpha center - Harmon Kardon HKB6 rears, Epik Sentinel & ED eQ.2.

  11. #11
    spencer321's Avatar
    spencer321 is offline CarAudio.com Elite

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    palm bay
    Posts
    1,691
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    thanks for the help guys, if bigger speakers tend to "beam" more, than why does everyone seem to have a preference in ways for 4" cone midranges as opposed to 2" dome midranges, if smaller speakers have less beaming affect (and there for better off axis response?) why would you want to run a larger midrange?

    or instance the RS52 vs the RS100




  12. #12
    KasparsIreland's Avatar
    KasparsIreland is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Ireland, Dublin
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    LPG 26NA aluminum Dome car Tweeter i bought them from madisound.com and after 2 month broken one tweeter.And second tweeter i think soon will be gone as well.

    Originaly bought Zaph|Audio ZA5 Autosound 2-Way, Pair code ZA5-AUTO and those tweeters was gone after 2 weeks.Then they offer me to change them with LPG.
    So better dont buy them.Waist of time and money!




  13. #13
    jrouter76's Avatar
    jrouter76 is offline jrouter76



    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Mount Vernon ,Illinois
    Posts
    1,186
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: LPG 26NA aluminum tweeter VS SEAS Prestige 27TAFNC/G aluminum

    Quote Originally Posted by spencer321 View Post
    im planning to pair them up with some ID oems, so crossover point in question is approx 2.5k

    when i said low end extension i was trying to say how low can you safely cross them without distortion or risk or blowing them up, just bad choice of phrasing.
    I have that setup: Seas neo Alum and ID OEM and 2.5k for the low on the tweets s just fine and the ID oems will play just fine @ 2-2.5 khz...I can crank it up to about 27-28 on my 9815 hu and it stays clear...I also set my amp gains using the test tones and a dmm to keep clipping at a minimum hope this helps....I hate distortion.



    Active Front Tweeters:Seas Neo Alumn.

    Midbass:ID OEMs
    Mids & Highs amp PPI DCX1000.4
    Subs 2-12 Si Mags 2nd gen.
    Box ported tuned to 34hz 2.17 cu.ft dual chambers
    Sub amp Kicker KX2500.1

    H/U:Alpine 9815
    Doors and Trunk are deaden by SS
    PPI MAN

    REFS:2lows10, XylerB, Scoobasteve, Ksin291,TheLow, Amokie , MemphisSoul4u , TheHardKnoxLife , RydHy3845 ,GORDOS420 , Mihklo,Jameseypoo , integra88

Closed Thread

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum