Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Reload Thread: do you prefer silk or Alum?

  1. #1
    04blackgmc's Avatar
    04blackgmc is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    332
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    do you prefer silk or Alum?

    for your tweets? i want good highs, strong.. So alum would be that right?



    04gto
    94 Isuzu pickup 2.6 Beater
    REFs CBFryman2,Ksin291,twisztdpunisher




  2. #2
    Max_Power's Avatar
    Max_Power is offline ^ From a Hairdryer ^



    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toledo, Ohio
    Posts
    2,130
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    17 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    I like silk, and cloth tweeters because of their softness and clarity. metal tweeters tend to sound sharp and edgy to me. this is kind of a preference thing here.

    I do suppose though, if you are going for strong highs, metal might be better.



    References: (Sold To) - Blackbonnie, Ridinhi, BigEM (Bought From) - 95BlackGA, jonnybusa, 2002XLT, IamDeMan, kasimo420, SPL140.2, sundownz
    MY REF PAGE

    Car: 1993 Ford Crown Vic LX
    HU: Panasonic CQ-C700U
    Speaker Amp: Audiopipe AP2002
    Sub Amp: Audiopipe AP18001
    Sub: 15" Kicker L7
    Box: 5.5 cu.ft. @ 35Hz w/ 68sq.in. of port
    Front Speakers: Alpine Type R 5x7
    Wiring: 1/0 Knu Wire, 4ga Stinger Wire, Knu Distribution Blocks, 1/0 Knu "Big Three", Fosgate RCAs
    Accesories: AudioControl Epicenter

  3. #3
    04blackgmc's Avatar
    04blackgmc is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    332
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Yea i also play with the windows down the most so i need something that can make up for that.



    04gto
    94 Isuzu pickup 2.6 Beater
    REFs CBFryman2,Ksin291,twisztdpunisher

  4. #4
    3.5Max6spd's Avatar
    3.5Max6spd is offline yo mama no wear no draws



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,767
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Whatever gets the job done in the install you need. Its not about dome properties as much as its about the strengths /limitations of particular drivers.

    You can get great off axis or more on axis focused tweets of either material, you can get smooth rolloff or extended response of either.



    rainbow....homemade sounds best
    DYNAUDIO E S O T E C....Mobile Fidelity

    Panasonic Vacuum Tube
    TRU Technology SSLD6
    TRU Technology STEEL S44 & S500
    DYNAUDIO Esotec System 362
    Dynaudio MW190 12" (x2) IB
    Stinger Expert/Esoteric Audio Isopath/Cascade


    Refs-NE14MX , jdavis37, anarchy57, mj121983 , ll kadoy ll, TheBigDu , cdj ,Kawasaki STX-R ,Fdeez ,Ksin291,meangta, lil azn 06, HAVINGFUN, Loud1500, Flipx99 , jjunior887 ,mastarecoil ,slammed , T3mpest ,westerbud, Airman21, bconn587, LexNBimmer,namike, alphakenny1, HebrewHammer,chadillac,remiserg, purerx7tt, OCURIEL, coneO,Igno,Iluvzmzm,godzukiduce,CrazedCat,skylar11 2,
    bose301s,qwertvt

  5. #5
    helotaxi's Avatar
    helotaxi is offline Kilroy was Here



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    South Central (New Mexico that is...)
    Age
    39
    Posts
    8,933
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Metal domes have a tendency to sound harsh when driven hard. It's a "feature" of the breakup properties of the metal. Silk dome can get more than loud enough. At moderate volumes you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between the two materials.



    Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity.

    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.

    Life's tough...it's even tougher when you're stupid.

  6. #6
    casper97ta's Avatar
    casper97ta is offline IM HERE FOR THE GANG BANG



    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,459
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    7 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    I really like metal domes. I dont think they sound too harsh just really loud and sharp. which is probably why i dont think MB tweets are too harsh. but really its just personal choice. you should go to a shop and listen to some models with each and see which sound you like the most.



    H.U- Alpine IVA-D310
    clarion EQS746 EQ
    Front stage- PPI 356CS
    Front amp- Exile S400.4
    Sub-
    Sub amp-
    NSB100

    _____________________

    REFS :pimpedout97x,Mike Dressure(x3),hc3_cuz,keefy248,seagrasser,Gammey4,p hillipcyoung,Hawaiian5(x2),Dumpin Treos,delvryboy, xtremebassjunky,All_Rice,AgEnT,96MaxGLE,kurtdirt1, Louisiana_CRX,wu501,REDLINEZ33,vxboi,mrogowski,Zeu slicious,LazyRider



    Quote Originally Posted by cotjones View Post
    you have to admit the equalizers do seem to make 1 watt sound like 2 (1000 watts from a jl sounds way louder than 1000 from an alpine or rockford or many other brands)

  7. #7
    SQChevy's Avatar
    SQChevy is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    390
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Beryllium




    2002 Green Chevy Z-71 Extended Cab pickup with bed cover - VEHICLE IS NO MORE
    Alpine VPA-B222 VehicleHub Pro, DVA-5210, TME-M770S, PXA-H700, KCA-100BT, TUA-T500HD
    Focal Be Tweeters, Be 6.5" Midrange, 21WX 8" Sub, 2x 40A 15" Subwoofer
    Focal 2 FP 1.800, FP 4.75
    2004/2005/2006 USACI World Champion
    2003 World Finalist

  8. #8
    phyphoestilic's Avatar
    phyphoestilic is offline Liquid Fire...



    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Age
    26
    Posts
    5,543
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    I went from Alum. to silk drivers, never look back again. I always perfered the soft roll off on the higher frequencies, the Alum. drivers i used sounded really harsh to my ears and i couldn't take them. Of course it could be the drivers themselves since they were completely different drivers. But I've used 2 sets of silk tweeters and loved them both over the alum.



    Lexus LS400 Setup
    Eclipse CD7000 (Running Active)
    Image Dynamic OEM CX64s
    Image Dynamics NX30 Tweeters
    US Acoustic USF600 x2, USF800 x2 (Zed Audio )
    150ft+ of Rammat
    IDMax12 1.5cft. I need to cut for IB
    25 feet 1/0 Stinger Expert, 15 feet 4 Stinger Pro
    Stinger Dream Series, Knu Konceptz Krystal Series RCAs

    Ref: (Bought From)Renegadesrun, IonSQL, CrazyJoker2, Alpine CDA-9815 , FI Car Audio, yournumber1dan , B_Campbell, jacobcopeland87, mike dressure x2, James_Bang, blue200sx
    (Traded w/) Iceteebone, sxkicker89
    (Sold To): James_Bang, timbo12, gsxrjjordan
    Ebay: PhyPhoestilic (100%)

  9. #9
    envengineer's Avatar
    envengineer is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    306
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by 3.5Max6spd View Post
    Whatever gets the job done in the install you need. Its not about dome properties as much as its about the strengths /limitations of particular drivers.

    You can get great off axis or more on axis focused tweets of either material, you can get smooth rolloff or extended response of either.
    x100

    The metal vs. textile tweeter debate has largely evaporated. There are so many different tweeters available that you can't make these types of assumptions based on dome material alone.

    I have heard plenty of metal domes that are not harsh, shrill, etc. and I've heard soft domes that I have found offensive to listen to, in direct contradiction to the conventional assumptions.

    You really need to consider on-axis vs. off-axis performance. A lot of tweeters will sound harsh if you point them right at your head, and they'll soften up if you turn them away. Take a look at dome size in relation to off-axis performance.

    Depending upon where you are putting them in your vehicle, wide dispersion or narrow dispersion could be very desireable qualities.



    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/245581-envengineer-%3D-great-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/322193-envengineer-amazing-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/324244-envengineer.html

  10. #10
    Gary S's Avatar
    Gary S is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ex JL Audio Rep
    Posts
    1,070
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Well, soft domes seem to be popular, most people say metal tweeters are too harsh.

    I wonder if it's an install issue... I see people putting tweeters in all kinds of crazy places, far from the mids, and causing situations where the tweeters of both channels have a severe difference in distance to a given listener... in cases of less than optimal speaker placement, I wonder if soft domes are more forgiving of speaker placement/install.

    I like metal tweeters... to me, something is missing with soft domes. But all my front speakers are always in the kick panels, and I use surround sound speakers in the rear, which tend to soften certain types of distortion. If I use soft domes, my systems sound too laid back.

    I'll also let you in on a little secret... metal domes seem to match the sound of high end headphones better... and headphones are what most recording engineers/producers are using to finalize the recordings we hear. I've had better results in good sound by trying to duplicate a recording and recording techniques than in trying to recreate live music.
    Last edited by Gary S; 05-24-2007 at 11:29 AM.



    For Sale


    Kicker C15C-4 Competition 15" 4-ohm subwoofer, new in box, old stock

    Soundstream Reference 405 5-channel amplifier

    (2) Parts Express DVC12 12 inch subwoofers

    Send a private message to me for more details on these products.

  11. #11
    envengineer's Avatar
    envengineer is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    306
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary S View Post
    I'll also let you in on a little secret... metal domes seem to match the sound of high end headphones better... and headphones are what most recording engineers/producers are using to finalize the recordings we hear. I've had better results in good sound by trying to duplicate a recording and recording techniques than in trying to recreate live music.

    That is quite the blanket statment. You are assuming all metal domes have some characteristic "metal" sound. This is simply not true across the board.

    You are further assuming that high end headphones all sound similar. They do not. Listen to my ER4s, my Grados, and my Senns and then tell me they sound the same (they don't).

    Most engineers/producers worth a **** do not use headphones alone to evaluate a final mix. Headphones have poor reproduction of staging cues unless the music was recorded specifically for reproduction on headphones (binaural, holophonic, whatever term you would like to use), and the low freqency reproduction of headphones does not touch that of decent home stereo.

    Studio monitors were designed specifically for the tasks you are alluding to.

    Hell, a few years ago, Abbey Road studio had 5 B&W Nautilus 801s as their studio monitors. While they may not be the best speakers ever built, they sound ****ed good (yes I have personally heard them albeit in only a 2 channel setup), but they are a very far cry from any headphones.



    With regard to your comment about install locations, this is exactly what I was talking about when I mentioned dispersion characteristics. Go grab a Hiquophon OWII and stick it in your kicks, I bet it would sound ****ing great if they weren't pointed right at you. This is largely due to their tremendous off-axis performance.

    The same tweeters might sound horrible in a-pillars because the wide dispersion would create a ton of unwanted and potentially annoying reflection off the glass and dash. Meanwhile, a big aluminum tweeter with narrow dispersion could sound great in the pillars and horrible in the kicks.

    While material is obviously something to consider when looking at a tweeter, it is important to remember that there is so much more to a tweeter than the dome material alone.



    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/245581-envengineer-%3D-great-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/322193-envengineer-amazing-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/324244-envengineer.html

  12. #12
    Gary S's Avatar
    Gary S is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ex JL Audio Rep
    Posts
    1,070
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by envengineer View Post
    That is quite the blanket statment. You are assuming all metal domes have some characteristic "metal" sound. This is simply not true across the board. .

    - This is why I don't usually make radical statements like this here, I don't always have time to discuss it. On the other hand, sometimes I slip because I think people want to hear other's opinions. Many facts are just opinions that we accept as fact.

    I say they have more potential (everything else being equal, which it never is, LOL!) in a great install... I would not say across the board that metal will always sound better... as you probably know, there is a great variance in tweeter quality. Especially in high power applications, a better soft dome will walk all over a poorer metal tweeter.

    Quote Originally Posted by envengineer View Post
    You are further assuming that high end headphones all sound similar. They do not. Listen to my ER4s, my Grados, and my Senns and then tell me they sound the same (they don't). .
    - I agree, but I'm willing to bet that more high end head phones sound better than a greater number of speakers in many areas... no crossover distortion, lower distortion, perfect stereo separation... there are some things they can do better and for a much lower cost than monitors.

    Quote Originally Posted by envengineer View Post
    Headphones have poor reproduction of staging cues unless the music was recorded specifically for reproduction on headphones (binaural, holophonic, whatever term you would like to use), and the low frequency reproduction of headphones does not touch that of decent home stereo. .
    - I agree totally... the main problems with headphones is no front sound-stage and unrealistic imaging (it sounds like everything is happening inside your head rather than watching a live, natural performance in front of you in the real world.), and lack of low frequency extension. What I try to approach in the car systems I design is sound like headphones but with the addition of a front sound stage and extension. I think in some ways it can sound better than live. But I would not call it natural. .[/QUOTE]

    One other point... I would say that installation quality, tunning, system design, and speaker placement are more important than the speakers themselves.



    For Sale


    Kicker C15C-4 Competition 15" 4-ohm subwoofer, new in box, old stock

    Soundstream Reference 405 5-channel amplifier

    (2) Parts Express DVC12 12 inch subwoofers

    Send a private message to me for more details on these products.

  13. #13
    envengineer's Avatar
    envengineer is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    306
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary S View Post
    One other point... I would say that installation quality, tunning, system design, and speaker placement are more important than the speakers themselves.
    Well said, I couldn't agree more.



    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/245581-envengineer-%3D-great-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/322193-envengineer-amazing-seller.html
    http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/324244-envengineer.html

  14. #14
    Hebrew Hammer's Avatar
    Hebrew Hammer is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    ST.Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,171
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by envengineer View Post
    Well said, I couldn't agree more.
    agreed...but when you have this down then having good drivers do make a huge difference...you do get what you pay for in most cases.....

    I tend to stick with silk....hell I tend to stick with scan to be honest



    Team Zapco, Team Raamat, Team Werewolf, Team Yo Moma, Team Audionutz, Team JK Labs

  15. #15
    alphakenny1's Avatar
    alphakenny1 is offline LOTUS FTW!



    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Age
    31
    Posts
    3,017
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: do you prefer silk or Alum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hebrew Hammer View Post
    agreed...but when you have this down then having good drivers do make a huge difference...you do get what you pay for in most cases.....

    I tend to stick with silk....hell I tend to stick with scan to be honest
    agree with tuning, speaker install and location are important but speakers do tend to have certain characteristics that certain people like when installed correctly so i agree also with hebrew that speaker selection is another important aspect.

    i'm using the cal26 titan and i am very happy. actually my two favorite tweets i've used personally are alums.



    W200/H701
    Dyn MW160/Lotus RM110/Seas Neo Alum/Idmax
    Alpine PDX

    References
    RoudyruffKK, mattmcss, BLD 25, 02corvette
    bjfish11 ,slain93gsr, DJGTSR, flakko, FoxPro5
    2.2l integra, rawdogj, guy022077, bumpn_gt
    lowlinc, rocky 59, alann, ECA, DIYMA

    bay area people need some custom work done? pm me. here's some work that we've done:
    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/151662/1
    http://s15.photobucket.com/albums/a3...man52/Install/
    http://www.v6performance.net/forums/...ad.php?t=76937

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum