Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Reload Thread: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

  1. #1
    theothermike's Avatar
    theothermike is offline I HAVE NO LIFE, CA = LIFE



    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    1,557
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Alright so i dont want something laid back, but i dont want something way to bright and harsh, soo i considered the cmx series from rainbows and the pro 60's from boston acoustics, both i hear are in the 300 range, both are slightly aggressive and get loud and produce fast mid bass while sounding great. Now i no there a lot of rainbow fanatics and theres a lot of boston fanatics in these forums, sooo ill be letting u no that these comps will be run off a arc audio, us amps, viper amps, or zapco amps. With aound 150 to the cmx's and 175 - 200 on the bostons. The amp that will be backing it up will be a si 12" mag d2 or 12" rl-s with around 1000 watts from same company of amps for comps.

    So here is what i want the vs. categories to be done on

    How good clarity is

    How aggressive

    How punchy and quick midbass is

    How good crossovers are from adjustability stand point

    How much power handling

    How loud they can reach

    How good hardware is that comes with the comp set.



    Thx,
    mike



    System:
    Fronts:ID Oem's & TBI Hdss Front Amps: Sundown Sax 100.2 & 100.4
    Subwoofer: 2x 12" Fi X D4s Sub Amps: Sundown Saz 1500D
    Headunit: Alpine CDA-9887 Batteries / Alternator: Powermaster / Mechman
    Deadener: Raamat BXT Ensolite Alarm: Clifford 50.5x
    References:
    -Premieraudio-Sundownz-Iamamp3pimp-Kpr10is-Jmanpc- MemphisLove-Greekpower-The 727 Kid-Gixxer9-Mobieous-Audiobahnuser18-Thewes-Steveyhustle-Gymfreak101-go_go_thrash




  2. #2
    IgnoreMe's Avatar
    IgnoreMe is offline I love 2 girls 1 cup



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    caraudio.com
    Age
    28
    Posts
    11,768
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Boston Pro60


    How good clarity is: so far its pretty darn good. speakers ive had experience with are alpine type r/s, cdt: cl-61, ef-61cfi, boston coaxials. my speakers before the bostons were the cfi's from cdt, and those were nice but the bostons just kill them and sound so much more "full" if you will.

    How aggressive: how aggresive do you want..the bostons have a tweeter attenuation (sp?). 0db, -2db, -4db. so you can kinda customize it to a point. but they sound real good to me at 0db and even better at -2db, but i sometimes prefer more aggressive tweets (and sometimes not) so im diggin the 0db right now. but they are not fatiguing my ears at all yet.

    How punchy and quick midbass is: they are in doors, with some sound deadening, but are still not optimally mounted, but with some good clean power, the mids kick pretty good, and are not muddy at all, to my ears.

    How good crossovers are from adjustability stand point: with the bostons you can bi-amp the tweets and the mid's, and the tweet crossover also has the attenuation i talked about earlier...one con, seperatly the xovers arent too bad, but put together they can be quite big and cumbersome and a pain to fit in some places.

    How much power handling: IMO can take 300 watts quite easily without any probslems. im sending mine 300 and they dont sweat it...didnt really believe the forum about the power handling on them, but decided to give it a try and low and behold...they were right. all i can say is i would NOT waste my time sending them their rated rms (125 watts)

    How loud they can reach: pretty **** loud...with 250 or more watts will be able to EASILY keep up with 1 12" mag. hell my old cdt's with about 200 kept up with 2 15's. if your just runnin 1k watts total i probably wouldnt even send them more than 200 watts. just keep in mind, having the ability to send them much more power is always nice, so dont just limit yourself on power for the pro60s

    How good hardware is that comes with the comp set. hardware is full and has most everything you need to get going. only gripe i have is the little allen head screws they give you. i found the allen bit they give you just mushes up the allen head in the screw makin it a ***** to get out...other than that its all good.



    llllllllllllllll Educate yourself and help stop the ignorance.
    llllllllllllllll DEA Judge Francis L Young says...
    llllllllllllllll Designing a Ported Box


    refs: hazardous0388, snoopdan, karleon, thelow, freezeman_7, imtjnotu, Gebrochen, astroladespl, billabongcr , mustbenu , thunder9500 , 91ser, djdilliodon (6 times), stupify, milenko515, Zeuslicious, Bmoorman05, WaTTsLOk187, too dope 1904, nate2587, rbiele126, denalilvr



    Don't Blame Me. I Voted for Ron Paul.

    BluePoint Air Ratchet for sale...click me bitch

  3. #3
    theothermike's Avatar
    theothermike is offline I HAVE NO LIFE, CA = LIFE

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    1,557
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    wow, i sorry bout that review of what i was needing about bostons wants me to drop rainbows, but i wanna hear from a few more people, Only thing i see going for rainbows is dual midbass cause i might ad kick panels and run tweet and mid in kick panel and run 1 woofer in door

    Mike



    System:
    Fronts:ID Oem's & TBI Hdss Front Amps: Sundown Sax 100.2 & 100.4
    Subwoofer: 2x 12" Fi X D4s Sub Amps: Sundown Saz 1500D
    Headunit: Alpine CDA-9887 Batteries / Alternator: Powermaster / Mechman
    Deadener: Raamat BXT Ensolite Alarm: Clifford 50.5x
    References:
    -Premieraudio-Sundownz-Iamamp3pimp-Kpr10is-Jmanpc- MemphisLove-Greekpower-The 727 Kid-Gixxer9-Mobieous-Audiobahnuser18-Thewes-Steveyhustle-Gymfreak101-go_go_thrash

  4. #4
    theothermike's Avatar
    theothermike is offline I HAVE NO LIFE, CA = LIFE

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    1,557
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    nobody else has an opinion?

    Mike



    System:
    Fronts:ID Oem's & TBI Hdss Front Amps: Sundown Sax 100.2 & 100.4
    Subwoofer: 2x 12" Fi X D4s Sub Amps: Sundown Saz 1500D
    Headunit: Alpine CDA-9887 Batteries / Alternator: Powermaster / Mechman
    Deadener: Raamat BXT Ensolite Alarm: Clifford 50.5x
    References:
    -Premieraudio-Sundownz-Iamamp3pimp-Kpr10is-Jmanpc- MemphisLove-Greekpower-The 727 Kid-Gixxer9-Mobieous-Audiobahnuser18-Thewes-Steveyhustle-Gymfreak101-go_go_thrash

  5. #5
    WhoSayWho?'s Avatar
    WhoSayWho? is offline Preston Caught a Predator



    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hempstead State Park
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Quote Originally Posted by George
    Boston Pro60


    How good clarity is: so far its pretty darn good. speakers ive had experience with are alpine type r/s, cdt: cl-61, ef-61cfi, boston coaxials. my speakers before the bostons were the cfi's from cdt, and those were nice but the bostons just kill them and sound so much more "full" if you will.

    How aggressive: how aggresive do you want..the bostons have a tweeter attenuation (sp?). 0db, -2db, -4db. so you can kinda customize it to a point. but they sound real good to me at 0db and even better at -2db, but i sometimes prefer more aggressive tweets (and sometimes not) so im diggin the 0db right now. but they are not fatiguing my ears at all yet.

    How punchy and quick midbass is: they are in doors, with some sound deadening, but are still not optimally mounted, but with some good clean power, the mids kick pretty good, and are not muddy at all, to my ears.

    How good crossovers are from adjustability stand point: with the bostons you can bi-amp the tweets and the mid's, and the tweet crossover also has the attenuation i talked about earlier...one con, seperatly the xovers arent too bad, but put together they can be quite big and cumbersome and a pain to fit in some places.

    How much power handling: IMO can take 300 watts quite easily without any probslems. im sending mine 300 and they dont sweat it...didnt really believe the forum about the power handling on them, but decided to give it a try and low and behold...they were right. all i can say is i would NOT waste my time sending them their rated rms (125 watts)

    How loud they can reach: pretty **** loud...with 250 or more watts will be able to EASILY keep up with 1 12" mag. hell my old cdt's with about 200 kept up with 2 15's. if your just runnin 1k watts total i probably wouldnt even send them more than 200 watts. just keep in mind, having the ability to send them much more power is always nice, so dont just limit yourself on power for the pro60s

    How good hardware is that comes with the comp set. hardware is full and has most everything you need to get going. only gripe i have is the little allen head screws they give you. i found the allen bit they give you just mushes up the allen head in the screw makin it a ***** to get out...other than that its all good.
    That's great to hear! There was some guy on here recently who seemed to be having a problem getting his new Pro 60's to keep up with his 12" mag. Maybe you can find that thread and put him on the right path.




  6. #6
    headless's Avatar
    headless is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Florida (Tallahassee)
    Posts
    1,292
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    LOL. That's the same guy, man.

    Oh..and Orig poster..
    My opinion is...get the Germanium's you already put in your sig... (you were right on the first guess)



    Eclipse CD7000 - RioCar Empeg 3
    Rainbow Powerline CS 275.27 / Arc Audio 4150 XXK (Woofers) - Arc Audio 2100 XXK (Tweeters)
    Rainbow Vanadium 12 x2 / Arc Audio 1500 XXK
    Quote Originally Posted by TEAM HAMMER
    Your so full of Crap! The last place you want a Midbass or Sub is in front of you Retard Whens the last time you seen a 12in+ sub up front?
    Quote Originally Posted by bdawson72
    Technically, bigger wire has more resistance.

  7. #7
    3.5Max6spd's Avatar
    3.5Max6spd is offline yo mama no wear no draws



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,767
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Expy2000 has the CMX's I believe, inquire from him . Other than that you wont find many other CMX users. The Powerline is newer line, not much exposure.

    The only thing that is certain is that the CMX tweeter is one that was in the Pro Vanadium $700+ set years ago. So for $300 a set, with some pretty detailed midbasess its a nice buying point. The tweeter has AWESOME off axis response, you can mount it anywhere- whether it be deep in the kicks, up in the pillars or even flush mounted in the doors-away from the mids, you'll hear it the same.
    That kind of power, its perfect for that set-without lacking in midbass. This set is more install friendly because of the off axis response.

    The Bostons seem to be very install dependant the more I read and need alot of juice to get optimal results. The fact that they are coax style mountable also leads me to the conclusion that set is best mounted that way, and designed for more on axis type of mounting . Likely why most of the Boston sponsored comp and show cars have them installed this way, on axis-coaxially mounted, facing the listener.
    Perhaps thats their forte, as they appear to be designed for that 'full range' speaker type of sound, not hard to conceive being their roots and technology in the home audio market.

    No wonder people throwing them flush in the doors require such huge amounts of power to be best satisfied with their response. Perhaps all they need is the advertised 125rms/250rms peak ratings for great sound on axis, but the off axis is so poor in comparsion that they need 3 times that juice to sound as good or to hear it as well? I dunno...
    If you plan to separate tweet and mid you should look into the specifics of this set. I cannot find the info myself. A friend has some tuning issues with this set with the drivers mounted apart, and has a pretty annoying midrange peak using the passive xovers. Hes now gone active and is trying to do some underlapping of freqs between the mid and tweet to lower it, and hes getting a very harsh response in the 1-4khz area. Anyone know what the specific parameters for each driver are? Xover point between them on the passive?



    rainbow....homemade sounds best
    DYNAUDIO E S O T E C....Mobile Fidelity

    Panasonic Vacuum Tube
    TRU Technology SSLD6
    TRU Technology STEEL S44 & S500
    DYNAUDIO Esotec System 362
    Dynaudio MW190 12" (x2) IB
    Stinger Expert/Esoteric Audio Isopath/Cascade


    Refs-NE14MX , jdavis37, anarchy57, mj121983 , ll kadoy ll, TheBigDu , cdj ,Kawasaki STX-R ,Fdeez ,Ksin291,meangta, lil azn 06, HAVINGFUN, Loud1500, Flipx99 , jjunior887 ,mastarecoil ,slammed , T3mpest ,westerbud, Airman21, bconn587, LexNBimmer,namike, alphakenny1, HebrewHammer,chadillac,remiserg, purerx7tt, OCURIEL, coneO,Igno,Iluvzmzm,godzukiduce,CrazedCat,skylar11 2,
    bose301s,qwertvt

  8. #8
    red metallic's Avatar
    red metallic is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    under an overpass
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Quote Originally Posted by 3.5Max6spd
    No wonder people throwing them flush in the doors require such huge amounts of power to be best satisfied with their response. Perhaps all they need is the advertised 125rms/250rms peak ratings for great sound on axis, but the off axis is so poor in comparsion that they need 3 times that juice to sound as good or to hear it as well? I dunno...

    If you plan to separate tweet and mid you should look into the specifics of this set. I cannot find the info myself. A friend has some tuning issues with this set with the drivers mounted apart, and has a pretty annoying midrange peak using the passive xovers. Hes now gone active and is trying to do some underlapping of freqs between the mid and tweet to lower it, and hes getting a very harsh response in the 1-4khz area. Anyone know what the specific parameters for each driver are? Xover point between them on the passive?
    A couple things about your friend's set of Boston Pro's. Inside the crossover is an adjustment for component or coaxial settings. If you set it for coaxial and use it as a component, you eliminate 1 pole of filtering in the crossover and increase the upper midrange output. Ideal when in a hard off-axis mounting. Before he rips everything apart, try that.

    They were not designed to have the tweeter dramatically far away from the woofer. If it is more than 12", he should try them coaxially and at least evaluate another set of tweeters mounted high in the dash with a high crossover point. I'd bet even without a high stage they will sound better coaxially. Or, move the tweeter closer to the woofer.

    Just some ideas.




  9. #9
    FoxPro5's Avatar
    FoxPro5 is offline Causal wanderer



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    3 octaves higher
    Posts
    5,449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    The Cal 25 hard dome is very nice as 3.5Max mentioned. I sold my old Pro Vanadium set in favor of the DIY route. But recently, I found my self going back the the Cal 25 silk because I liked it so much. Not sure if the silk dome is an option on the CMX set??

    I've heard the Pro 60's a few times and just by own ears found the metal tweet to be a bit too much for me. They seemed to need a bit a taming. I love the build quality and presentation of Boston products though.

    I vote Rainbow for plug and play.



    TEAM Front Fill

    The Fox audiomobile now sounds more quality thanks to SDS power.

    The most expensive solution is the one that doesn't do the job correctly. ~ Me

  10. #10
    jacka's Avatar
    jacka is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,244
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    the cal25 silk sure is an option with the cmx set. i was wondering the same thing a while back and got a good answer



    References:

    Sold to: nauticagmo, 808bmw, hustler904, protocol_droid, latina33, dub22, morgans432, BassmentJack, Sr SQ (diymobileaudio), macxx (diymobileaudio)

    Bought from: sundownz, bjfish11, 6spdcoupe, 02TurboA4, ngsm13

  11. #11
    Kickerkitty's Avatar
    Kickerkitty is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    kk
    Age
    34
    Posts
    554
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    I can offer you a bit of info on the Pro60's

    The guy above with the very long post was absolutely correct on every point. As far as mounting tweeters coaxial style, that's how I did it, but mainly for the best possible imaging. Pro60's can handle a lot of power true, but I have given them amounts ranging from 175 watts per side, to 300+ per side and they loved it in both cases. For a metal tweeter I do not find them fatiguing to the ears, I even prefer titanium instead of aluminum and I can find no fault with them.
    Basically when it comes down to it there isn't a single thing I would change about the Pro60's and I find no fault whatsoever with them. I run Pioneer PRS hardware throughout and I found that the Bostons are absolutely brilliant at taking a pure, unbastardized signal, and giving it perfect reproduction. I honestly wouldn't trade my Pro60's for anything, except just maybe some Pro 6.5's or Z6's.




  12. #12
    6spdcoupe's Avatar
    6spdcoupe is offline tends to get a bit cranky



    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    In the armpit of the US
    Age
    40
    Posts
    12,821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxPro5
    The Cal 25 hard dome is very nice as 3.5Max mentioned. I sold my old Pro Vanadium set in favor of the DIY route. But recently, I found my self going back the the Cal 25 silk because I liked it so much. Not sure if the silk dome is an option on the CMX set??

    I've heard the Pro 60's a few times and just by own ears found the metal tweet to be a bit too much for me. They seemed to need a bit a taming. I love the build quality and presentation of Boston products though.

    I vote Rainbow for plug and play.

    Anything is possible my friend.




    DVI-9990/TMI-M990/PXI-H990
    TRU Billet 2200 ..Dyn Esotar 1200
    TRU Billet 4100 ..Dyn Esotar110/Esotar430
    TRU Billet 4100 ..DYN MD182s

    Refs:
    Way to many to list, seriously. I lost count when it passed 100

  13. #13
    JoeHemi57's Avatar
    JoeHemi57 is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Little Rock, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,526
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Quote Originally Posted by 6spdcoupe
    Anything is possible my friend.
    wish i had known that before i ordered the X-lines



    References:
    ebay "joeshemi57"
    IonSQL, idealrealist, excelerater, siliconinja, khail19, Silver Supra, FoxPro5, edwelly, newtitan, Raven2201, cd6551, Colin+M

  14. #14
    FoxPro5's Avatar
    FoxPro5 is offline Causal wanderer



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    3 octaves higher
    Posts
    5,449
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    Quote Originally Posted by 6spdcoupe
    Anything is possible my friend.
    Mmmk...how bout some Plats for one time FoxPro exclusive special of $99.95

    Well in that case I'd personally go with the Rainbow with the silk.

    How does the Power line mid compare with the Germ and Profi mid??



    TEAM Front Fill

    The Fox audiomobile now sounds more quality thanks to SDS power.

    The most expensive solution is the one that doesn't do the job correctly. ~ Me

  15. #15
    theothermike's Avatar
    theothermike is offline I HAVE NO LIFE, CA = LIFE

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    1,557
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Probably a hard vs thread, pro 60's vs cmx 265's

    sorry everyone i was in hawaii

    Lots of new opinions, lots of new info learned, makes decision time that much harder

    Mike



    System:
    Fronts:ID Oem's & TBI Hdss Front Amps: Sundown Sax 100.2 & 100.4
    Subwoofer: 2x 12" Fi X D4s Sub Amps: Sundown Saz 1500D
    Headunit: Alpine CDA-9887 Batteries / Alternator: Powermaster / Mechman
    Deadener: Raamat BXT Ensolite Alarm: Clifford 50.5x
    References:
    -Premieraudio-Sundownz-Iamamp3pimp-Kpr10is-Jmanpc- MemphisLove-Greekpower-The 727 Kid-Gixxer9-Mobieous-Audiobahnuser18-Thewes-Steveyhustle-Gymfreak101-go_go_thrash

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum