I use two 2channels.
nG

I use two 2channels.
nG
http://crunktimes.com/ct/
nG - BSEE

For a 2-way front, generally, yes. If you need more powa, bridging is always nice, but will need more channels of amplification to do so. Bridging will also give the benefit to balance L/R separately if you don't already have the processing to do so.
For a simple 2-way front + sub, you will need a 3-way xover (2-way front + sub = 3!). and no, the quantity of highs, mids or lows will not cause you to need more than a 3-way xover. ie. tweet, mids, and two or mor subs will still just need a 3-way xover.
1--High pass for highs/tweets (HP)
2--Bandpass for mids (HP+LP)
3--Lowpass for sub(s)
=1,2,3-way
soooo, for a 3-way ''system'' you'll need a minimum of 5 channels of amplification. 2 tweets + 2 mids + 1 sub = 5
3-way front + sub, will call for a 4-way xover
1--High pass for highs/tweets
2--Bandpass for midrange
3--Bandpass for midbass
4--Lowpass for sub
=4-way
a minimum of 7 channels of amplification is need for a 4-way "system"

94 Caprice Classic LS: DEH-P800PRS, TS-C720PRS, MRV-F545, MRD-M1005, 2 REF-TM12.4 in 2.5 net cubes sealed; 97 Grand Cherokee TSi: CDA-9855, TS-D1720C, MRV-F345, MRD-M605, SWX-1043D in .54 net cubes sealed
Resident Jeep Expert, Mother Fucker

REFS:
Sold to: stevew007, Worstenemy453, HelloImBob, All_Rice, Durney, sixfootman2005, jaes90, d-REW, RidnClean, Pbateman
Bought from: Lousiana_crx, 96impala, KHARPS, Pjvoc, WhiteIce, Dvcevoblack, Jrgreene1968, Zack39648, Dave_Damage, Freelander, Connersdad19, Slammed, Ali1, TeamSouthrnBass, RXZILLA, oldschool4me, Fusion_FREAK, Simpsonbuck, Acex3a, jaredspl, JEXTEL, jamesw, orangelss, Ridinhi, 01 S 10, jmkanek, luv2shrOOm, braggpawn, sub2weeker, tv559, Alanhall,
Traded with: Duece212, cleansoundz, kcdc30, got_focus?, 90accordman, BASS_WARRIOR, crazyman03,
Smurfygotmojo=scammer!!!
For some reason one amp per speaker made me conclude he was referring to a mono amp, probably because I saw one and my mind turned that into mono. Bridging a 2 channel amp for each speaker would definitely work, as long as the speakers could take the power. You could also use a head unit that will let you take full control of each speaker seperately. This could potentially give you the same controls with a single 4 channel amp that four 2 channel amps would provide.
94 Caprice Classic LS: DEH-P800PRS, TS-C720PRS, MRV-F545, MRD-M1005, 2 REF-TM12.4 in 2.5 net cubes sealed; 97 Grand Cherokee TSi: CDA-9855, TS-D1720C, MRV-F345, MRD-M605, SWX-1043D in .54 net cubes sealed
Resident Jeep Expert, Mother Fucker

I would think the only reason they would be better is because you'd be able to get more power out of them. As far as processing goes, with my hu I'm able to fully tailor each speaker independently. I can use my 16 band graphic eq for left and right, in network mode (3 way active) I can control time alignment, level, and crossover point and slope for each individual speaker. What more could using four 2 channel amps do other than provide more power?
94 Caprice Classic LS: DEH-P800PRS, TS-C720PRS, MRV-F545, MRD-M1005, 2 REF-TM12.4 in 2.5 net cubes sealed; 97 Grand Cherokee TSi: CDA-9855, TS-D1720C, MRV-F345, MRD-M605, SWX-1043D in .54 net cubes sealed
Resident Jeep Expert, Mother Fucker

stereo separation for the fancy folks.
Stereo separation seems very possible just by using the time alignment correctly to place yourself directly in the "middle" of the speakers. I don't see how stereo separation can be better just by using four 2 channel amps. As long as you're in the middle or have the time alignment set correctly, you should get proper stereo separation.
94 Caprice Classic LS: DEH-P800PRS, TS-C720PRS, MRV-F545, MRD-M1005, 2 REF-TM12.4 in 2.5 net cubes sealed; 97 Grand Cherokee TSi: CDA-9855, TS-D1720C, MRV-F345, MRD-M605, SWX-1043D in .54 net cubes sealed
Resident Jeep Expert, Mother Fucker
OK....so I'll go with the KS300.4 for the front. My HU has a high pass and low pass (sub) xover built in.
Since my HU only has high and low, will I require an external xover that is 3-way compatible (like the Arc IDX Xover)?
http://www.woofersetc.com/p7201/IDX-...-Crossover.htm
Thanks
Insert message here
2 channel and 4 channel amps have "crosstalk." It's near impossible for those amps to have channels that are 100% purely separated. Some amps, like the old Eclipse amps had separated their channels 100% which is why they are still popular these days.
Car audio IS an addiction.
C.A.A.A Member #1
(Car Audio Addicts Anonymous)
Refs http://www.caraudio.com/forums/buyer-seller-feedback/278560-nismos14-feedback-refs-thread.html
ive been out of the stereo scene for a very long time.at least 20 yrs......soo i need some help...
im just about done with a 60 impala..been working on it for 5 yrs now..
ive got several older zapco amps..studios and compititions..
im just about ready to buy a head unit,speakers,processor/crossovers?
it sounds like active is the best sq?
can someone give me some tips on a good deck/processor that handles the active process?
i was leaning tword an eclipse 7200?
6 pre outs..no power...8 volts..and i think it has built in crossovers?
not sure if this is the right direction..
i hate to spend over 500.00 on a hu
focal k2 or morels ..or maybe dls...for speakers???
like i said i just dont have the exp or knowledge to buy the right combination of speakres,deck,?
anyone avail in the bayarea that does quality installs?
p.m. me
heres what ive got for amps..
1 studio 500
1 z600c2-sl
1 z400c4-sl
3 z300c2-slx
1 z300c2
1 sx-lx eq/crossover
1 sp-4
all older stuff... but pretty good in its day..
troytag@comcast.net
thanks..
Bookmarks