Closed Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Reload Thread: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

  1. #1
    Mike75's Avatar
    Mike75 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    World
    Age
    25
    Posts
    120
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    I cannot decide which set is better or the differences in sound between them...They are equal cost, so if you could give me your thoughts on either of these speakers, Pro's Con's, I would really appreciate it...Thank you







  2. #2
    joetama's Avatar
    joetama is offline The British Ear



    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Age
    28
    Posts
    15,306
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    Have you listened to either of them?







  3. #3
    XtrmAudioCncpts's Avatar
    XtrmAudioCncpts is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fairfax, Va
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,294
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    my $.02 get the boston pro's cant go wrong with something that could take 300wrms all day long. plus they sound GREAT





    Quote Originally Posted by Devillain00
    XAC = pimpin since been pimpin

  4. #4
    Mike75's Avatar
    Mike75 is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    World
    Age
    25
    Posts
    120
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    No one else has an opinion?




  5. #5
    thefunkybunch's Avatar
    thefunkybunch is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    cloud9
    Age
    33
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    the kenwood's can't touch the pro's. the boston's are louder, cleaner, will take more power, and have way more midbass. i honestly expected a lot more out of the kenwood's, especially for a 7" driver. they look really nice, and they move a whole lot, but don't produce a lot of midbass at all. and no, they weren't out of phase. midbass is just badly lacking. they get very loud, but are also very harsh. tried playing around with all the jumpers and eq'ing the **** out of them, but they just don't sound right.

    just my experiences with them. but then again, my opinion is a bit biased so go listen for your self. let your ears decide, because you are the one that will be listening to them, not me




  6. #6
    Colin+M's Avatar
    Colin+M is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    small town, AL
    Posts
    1,243
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    boston pro's for teh win


    Yes i have heard them, and me likey the Bostons. Hell, just go for the Z6's

    Bostons had a better tweeter IMO, and better midbass....as funkybunch said.




  7. #7
    loud-n-low's Avatar
    loud-n-low is offline i give ladies 30mm xmax



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    upstate NY
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,634
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    boston




  8. #8
    air_odie's Avatar
    air_odie is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    FLA USA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    get the bostons and KNOW YOU made the right choice I know I did!!!

    running mine with a JL 300.4 on an eclipse 4455 and WOW!!




  9. #9
    excelon72's Avatar
    excelon72 is offline Member



    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    lafayette,nj
    Posts
    54
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    im a die hard excelon fan for the money they are excellent UNTIL the 25th anniversaries. paid wayyyyy to much and gott little in return. they sound the same as the 250.00 dual mags excelons i replaced them with. very dissapointed have 2 sets in basement anr thats where they wills stay. beware of the pol 6500's they are a true sw speaker, if you like bostons(aka very "bright" tweeter) you WILL not like the polks. a true sw speaker has a flat response curve and does not POP or COLOUR the music. most people who think they want sq dont the just want a well rounded SPL system. a proper sq system has one set of front speakers and one high quality sub. the polks will let you hear the music the way it was uppose to be hear...that might not be what you really wanna hear




  10. #10
    FJF's Avatar
    FJF
    FJF is offline No Team



    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NYS
    Posts
    1,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    Quote Originally Posted by excelon72 View Post
    beware of the pol 6500's they are a true sw speaker, if you like bostons(aka very "bright" tweeter) you WILL not like the polks. a true sw speaker has a flat response curve and does not POP or COLOUR the music.
    I've had the Pro60s and the Polk SR6500s in the same install. Setup identically - tweeters low in the A-pillars, mids low in the doors) - with the tweeter jumpers on the stock crossovers configured to -2 for the BAs and -3 for the SRs (lowest setting) - the SRs sounded much brighter than the Pros. While I don't disagree that the SRs are more transparent speakers all around, installed the way I described, the Pro's tonal balance is less aggressive. Active is a different story, as the SR's tweeter level can be padded down further than their crossovers allow.



    Alpine - US Acoustics - Earthquake



  11. #11
    Jumbo Jet's Avatar
    Jumbo Jet is offline Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    41
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    Just sold my Boston Pro 60's. The tweeters are very bright. But if you like that, you'll have fun with them. They take a lot of power and get very loud and clear.




  12. #12
    FJF's Avatar
    FJF
    FJF is offline No Team



    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NYS
    Posts
    1,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumbo Jet View Post
    Just sold my Boston Pro 60's. The tweeters are very bright. But if you like that, you'll have fun with them. They take a lot of power and get very loud and clear.
    Out of sheer curiosity, how did you configure the Pro60's crossovers?



    Alpine - US Acoustics - Earthquake



  13. #13
    Jumbo Jet's Avatar
    Jumbo Jet is offline Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    41
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    I was running them passive and after much trail and error I ended up with the jumpers in the middle, but I tried all the positions. I liked the clarity but they were just too bright for me.




  14. #14
    FJF's Avatar
    FJF
    FJF is offline No Team



    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NYS
    Posts
    1,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Boston Pro 60 vs Kenwood 25th anniversary components

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumbo Jet View Post
    I was running them passive and after much trail and error I ended up with the jumpers in the middle, but I tried all the positions. I liked the clarity but they were just too bright for me.
    Comments referring to the Pro60s as being too bright are common, and I always wonder about the setup and config. I've used the Pro60 passively, too. Dropping the tweeter level to -4, vs -2 (ie. the middle position, factory setting), would have alleviated the excess HF energy you may have been hearing. Not knowing the setup of your deck and the scope of the install, there may have been other factors at play, but the the lack of an appropriate x-over setting remains a constant. Good luck.



    Alpine - US Acoustics - Earthquake



Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: Boston Pro Series 4" Mids
    By dezyrme in forum Wanting to Buy (WTB) - Car Audio
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 09:00 PM
  2. Kenwood KFC-XR71p components any good?
    By Tjay in forum Speakers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-24-2004, 10:47 PM
  3. Boston Pro 12LF sub
    By na_joey in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2003, 09:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum