Closed Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Reload Thread: bi-amping Vs. normal use

  1. #1
    shibby15's Avatar
    shibby15 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    israel
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    bi-amping Vs. normal use

    I'm currently pretty fixated on buying alpine type-x 6.5" component set. My question is:
    I've noticed they can be bi-amped – throw the cross over.
    What does that mean? Do I need to cross them my self or are they still being crossed passively?
    Is 50*2 per side good?
    And what do I gain from bi amping apposed to lets say giving each side 75-80RMS in normal use?

    thanks in advence







  2. #2
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    Bi-amping is where you power each speaker (mid and tweeter) independently, with each speaker on their own amplifier channel but still running through the passive crossover. So, instead of having a single input on each passive crossover; you would have two inputs. And no, you don't need to cross them over yourself. The passive crossover will still do the frequency splitting. In your situation, to bi-amp you would need 4 channels of amplification rather than only 2 channels.

    50w x 2 may be good depending on what you are wanting out of the system.

    Bi-amping would give you more flexibility. You could, for example, use more power on the mids than on the tweeters (say, a 100w x 2 amp for the mids, and a 50w x 2 amp for the tweeters). And you could use the gains to level match the speakers better. Plus, depending on the crossovers on the amplifier, you could do some additional crossover tweaking by using the amplifier's built in crossovers.




  3. #3
    shibby15's Avatar
    shibby15 is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    israel
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    the only thing that makes my not shure is the RMS ratings.
    woofer at 40 and tweter at 25.
    i dont know if i can get the amp to do 25 (its rated at 50*4).




  4. #4
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    Is the tweeter 4ohm or 8ohm?




  5. #5
    shibby15's Avatar
    shibby15 is offline Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    israel
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    its 4 ohm...
    and so is the woofer.




  6. #6
    johnecon2001's Avatar
    johnecon2001 is offline SSA/ROE Super-Møderator



    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,137
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    Just keep the gains low on the tweeter side. You'll be fine.




    Don't PM me, I'm not here. Find me on SSA or ROE
    No, I won't re-upload the Big3 pictures. Don't ask.

  7. #7
    hellbender's Avatar
    hellbender is offline Member



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    38
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    I had a question pertaining to this thread...is it possible when bi-amping to just wire your components in parallel to a 2 ohm load? If so what is the best way to do this? I have A/D/S components that are bi-ampable. My jbl amp pus out 123 watts rms per channel and my speakers are rated at 150 watts rms. by dropping them to a 2 ohm load they would see 169 watts rms. Is it worth going to a lower ohm for more power? thanks,




  8. #8
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    I presume you mean wire each side's speaker's in parallel (i.e. Right mid and tweet in parallel to one channel, Left mid & tweet paralleled to the other channel). If so.......I do not believe you wouldn't gain anything. Since the drivers would be in parallel, they would "share" the power (just like wiring two subs in parallel)......




  9. #9
    OlogyAudio's Avatar
    OlogyAudio is offline Audio-Ologist



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Shepherdsville, KY
    Age
    28
    Posts
    765
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    Quote Originally Posted by hellbender
    I had a question pertaining to this thread...is it possible when bi-amping to just wire your components in parallel to a 2 ohm load? If so what is the best way to do this? I have A/D/S components that are bi-ampable. My jbl amp pus out 123 watts rms per channel and my speakers are rated at 150 watts rms. by dropping them to a 2 ohm load they would see 169 watts rms. Is it worth going to a lower ohm for more power? thanks,
    if you had 2 pairs of component sets that were 4 ohms you would end up with a system of 2 ohm nature...

    if you have a 4ohm midwoofer and a 4 ohm tweeter.... with an xover -- in parallel... it acts at one 4 ohm speaker and funny stuff happens arround the xover frequency depending on how crappy/good the design of the xover is...



    Dylan Matlow -- Ology Audio

    -------------------------------------------------

    Believe it or not That is a 6.5"

  10. #10
    hellbender's Avatar
    hellbender is offline Member



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    38
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: bi-amping Vs. normal use

    ok, i understand that. thanks for your input guys....




Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Normal to EQ/DV switch
    By kuijo in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-25-2005, 07:18 PM
  2. Bi amping a 3 way system
    By jmenace13 in forum Wiring, Electrical and Installation Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-19-2005, 10:37 PM
  3. can this be used as a normal head unit?
    By hdave in forum Head Units
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-07-2005, 05:34 PM
  4. Amp goes normal, then protect, normal, protect...
    By flakko in forum Wiring, Electrical and Installation Help
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-21-2005, 04:47 PM
  5. Bi amping a 3 way system
    By jmenace13 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-31-2004, 12:34 PM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum