I have a chance to trade my 2000 XLT Explorer(5.0 AWD) for a 97 4dr 4x4 Tahoe.
Both are clean,mileage is similar.
I want something bigger is the only reason Im considering it.
Can you compare these 2 suvs? Or is it unfair.
Printable View
I have a chance to trade my 2000 XLT Explorer(5.0 AWD) for a 97 4dr 4x4 Tahoe.
Both are clean,mileage is similar.
I want something bigger is the only reason Im considering it.
Can you compare these 2 suvs? Or is it unfair.
Keep the X.
ditch the ford. nothing but trouble. chevys are much more reliable. not an opinion....a fact formed from years of experience.
I'd pass on either they don't work to well for home theaters
Tis true...Quote:
Originally Posted by wenn_du_weinst
I wouldn't down trade to a 1997
if he wants to trade there is more than likely a problem.
Another Ex owner I see ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasatch
I'd have to disagree. I had nothing but fords,never anything serious. I know plenty of people who's GM product had their motor start knocking,was it negligence idk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ville Audio J
I had a 92 351w bronco which had <8 psi of oil,never knocked or ticked. Had to scrap thought because body wasnt worth rebuilding the motor.
Another concern of mine. I would love to trade for a Expedition,but cant find that right person.Quote:
Originally Posted by wenn_du_weinst
---------- Post added at 08:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------
Claims mpg is an issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by kramer_212
[/QUOTE]
Claims mpg is an issue.[/QUOTE]
could be
but you would think there is something else.
Call me delusional, but I think Im downgrading.Quote:
could be
but you would think there is something else.
In fact, I also like this before the weighed quite long later I think this word is mainly the individual hobby primarily it but would still have many aspects to consider carefully
wtf i though this was in the lounge. mods please move