Closed Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Reload Thread: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    OC, Cali
    Posts
    33
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    Hi hows it going everyone. I installed a crappy head deck in my car cause it came in a package deal which was a flip down HU tape player and a 6 disc changer ( wanting to keep the old school tape player). Anyhow it has wayyyy to much engine noise and distortion, and I know for a fact that it's the cheap stereo because the stock didn't do that. So after this much blah blah I have narrowed down to getting a new one between the Alpine CDM-9821 and the Kenwood KDC-325. I like the Kenwood cause it's flip down and comes w/ a remote. However, the Alpine has a bass engine and subwoofer control built in which I don't know much about. Does the bass engine matter, and can someone tell me what its function? Plus some feedback of sound quality and relibilty of both would be nice.

    Thank You







  2. #2
    powerslide's Avatar
    powerslide is offline Member



    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Vancouver Canada
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    bass engine allows you to adjust the center frequency of your bass and your bass level. Subwoofer control means that there is a dedicated RCA output and adjustment function for your subwoofer.
    Basically, with bass engine you can make the bass fat or tight, and adjust if you want it to focus on higher bass notes or low ones.
    If you go with Alpine you will not be disapointed with sound quality, you will be very impressed. An alpine headunit can make even stock speakers sound great.
    If the only reasons you want the kenwood are flip and remote, then do yourself a favour and get the alpine.




  3. #3
    supa_c's Avatar
    supa_c is offline Abministrator



    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In a chair
    Posts
    19,367
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    IIRC its the "width" or Q ?
    not 100% shure




  4. #4
    VOA_NIGHTMARE's Avatar
    VOA_NIGHTMARE is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    upstate ny
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    If you go with the alpine go with a higher modle. I just tested on in my car a few weeks ago. Thing sounded so bad, even with the features on it the bbe a sub control there wasnt much to tune in to get it to sound good. I hated it. I have used better ones and cant say anything bad about them really. I have a kenwood Excelon x711. And that deck is 10x better than the alpine I just tested out for my brother. You get what you pay for.




  5. #5
    ANeonRider's Avatar
    ANeonRider is offline teamSSAudio.com



    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK, CAN
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,811
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    BBE or MX is a waste of time to use, makes the music sound so gross. Don't use them.




  6. #6
    VOA_NIGHTMARE's Avatar
    VOA_NIGHTMARE is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    upstate ny
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    yea thats why I like my high end kenwood. Tune each specs to hrtz and these crossovers are great on it.




  7. #7
    probmxstyle's Avatar
    probmxstyle is offline The Well Dressed OG



    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    MD
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,280
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: ///Alpine Vs. Kenwood

    MX actually makes the radio sound alot better (when i actually listen to the radio). I have it set to the second level out of the three.




    H/U: Pioneer Z1
    Front stage: Polk SR6500
    Front stage amp: Kicker SX500.2
    Acc: Kicker SXRC network controller
    Subs: MTX 9512-44
    Sub Amp:MTX TE1501D
    Battery: Optima yellow top
    Sound Dampening: Dynamat extreme

    Refs: LopezEL, PatFitz9, iamamp3pimp, nismos14, ctcsoft, negativezeroz, BigOso, LegendaryLemon, Pickler,86svo, chrisw91,gixxer9

Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Kenwood Equipment
    By BoomOhMy in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-25-2002, 07:50 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-18-2002, 12:17 AM
  3. Kenwood Excelon VS. Kenwood regular
    By adamawayfrommpa in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-29-2002, 05:39 AM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum