Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Reload Thread: Kenwood vs. Alpine

  1. #1
    07maximan's Avatar
    07maximan is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Temecula Ca.
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Kenwood vs. Alpine

    I had/have a Kenwood X993. Just recently I cam across an Alpine IXA W407. It was a good deal so I bought it. I really like the features of this unit,but the SQ is lacking,quite a bit actually. The Kenwood sounded great,but Im not a huge fan of the single DIN. Id use it again if I had to but Id rather not.

    My question is this,does the imprint kit make that much of a difference in the Alpine units? Because the SQ of it right now is killing me. I should be able to sell the Kenwood for enough to buy the imprint or should I keep the Kenwood?? Im need some guidance here,so any help or input would be appreciated.







  2. #2
    DDtC's Avatar
    DDtC is offline High Output SQ



    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Va Beach, Va
    Age
    33
    Posts
    7,257
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    I have the 404.. It has limited EQ settings but I dont use them anyway. SQ is really clean and I love the Ipod control, I dont miss CDs at all



    • 2010 Scion tC
    • Pioneer DEH-80PRS
    • JL 450/4v2 Active (Mid range, tweeters) JL 300/2v2 (Mid bass) DD M4(Subs)
    • Hertz HV 165XL
    • Hertz HT28
    • JL ZR800
    • 2 x DD 9512i
    • Singer 300 amp 15.1v bypass, 3 XS D3400s
    • Viper 5701 with Smart Start

  3. #3
    07maximan's Avatar
    07maximan is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Temecula Ca.
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Quote Originally Posted by HazeGrey75 View Post
    I have the 404.. It has limited EQ settings but I dont use them anyway. SQ is really clean and I love the Ipod control, I dont miss CDs at all
    See I disagree with this. I feel it sounds very flat. At high volumes its harsh and ear piercing. The other thing I noticed was that in oder to get any sound from my sub I have to turn it all the way up. With the Kenwood I had it on 0 or the 1-2 range. Im assuming this is the 4v vs 2v pre outs??




  4. #4
    DDtC's Avatar
    DDtC is offline High Output SQ



    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Va Beach, Va
    Age
    33
    Posts
    7,257
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    The sub out controls to pre out voltage. its like a gain knob. all the way up is 2v on mine. I dont know how your is set up but mine sounds fine. I got everything amped though.



    • 2010 Scion tC
    • Pioneer DEH-80PRS
    • JL 450/4v2 Active (Mid range, tweeters) JL 300/2v2 (Mid bass) DD M4(Subs)
    • Hertz HV 165XL
    • Hertz HT28
    • JL ZR800
    • 2 x DD 9512i
    • Singer 300 amp 15.1v bypass, 3 XS D3400s
    • Viper 5701 with Smart Start

  5. #5
    07maximan's Avatar
    07maximan is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Temecula Ca.
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Yeah Im amped all around too. The mains sound ok,its just everything on the sub is pretty much cranked. Do you use the Imprint kit?




  6. #6
    DDtC's Avatar
    DDtC is offline High Output SQ



    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Va Beach, Va
    Age
    33
    Posts
    7,257
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Ive looked into it but i didnt need it. My settings are all flat and the crossovers and HPF are set and it sounds good to me. I heard the new 900 sounds really clean so thats what im doing next year



    • 2010 Scion tC
    • Pioneer DEH-80PRS
    • JL 450/4v2 Active (Mid range, tweeters) JL 300/2v2 (Mid bass) DD M4(Subs)
    • Hertz HV 165XL
    • Hertz HT28
    • JL ZR800
    • 2 x DD 9512i
    • Singer 300 amp 15.1v bypass, 3 XS D3400s
    • Viper 5701 with Smart Start

  7. #7
    07maximan's Avatar
    07maximan is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Temecula Ca.
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Can anyone comment on the Imprint kit?




  8. #8
    DDSC's Avatar
    DDSC is offline Wang-aholic



    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Jackson, MI
    Posts
    962
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Yea what is the imprint kit and what does it do or help with, Im looking at a kenwood KDC X995 versus the Alpine CDA 117. I want the kenwood for the looks, remote, higher signal to noise ratio and time alignment but its not CEA compliant.

    I want the alpine for the fact that I can get the 45 watt rms amp that plugs into factory wiring and fits behind the dash so I dont need a ammp and wiring out back for a extra amp but I HATE Alpines headunits as far as looks go

    Any input on these two headunits from anyone





    Refrences: Tonyguy (Bought from), duece212 (Bought From) blackbonnie (Sold To) Woofer Cooker (Trade) Zeuslicious (Trade)

    Headunit: Kenwood Excelon X995
    Speakers: Alpine SPR-60Cs
    Sub : DD 9515h series
    Sub Amp : Alpine MPR2000
    Wire: 0/1 Kicker Hyperflex

  9. #9
    Joseph7195's Avatar
    Joseph7195 is offline Can't Walk, I still F*ck



    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saltillo, Mississippi, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,128
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    10
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    I have the Kenwood Excelon X542. I absolutely love it. I have had no problems what-so-ever out of it. I feel the same way as OP, I have heard both Alpine and Kenwood, in the same application(same speakers and amp set-up) and the Kenwood just sounded better to me. But I can't see SO MANY audio enthusiasts on here being wrong and going with Alpine just because of the name. There has to be something I am missing. I know the Kenwood has the ability to defeat the Ipod's Headphone EQ, so maybe that's part of it.



    Alpine 9833
    Boston Accoustics Front & Rear
    Cadence United Series Vegas 4 Channel
    Cadence S2W12-D2
    Cadence United Series Dakota Mono Amp
    Duralast 1,000 amp battery, X-Static 2,000 Amp Battery
    Rockford Foagate 1/0 wire, and interconnects
    Cadence shielded RCA wire
    Dynamat sound deadening, Fatmat sound deadening

  10. #10
    wickedwitt's Avatar
    wickedwitt is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Abilene, TX
    Posts
    2,982
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    5
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    A couple of things I can say about the Alpine. It is one of the few head units in the world where the sub control is a cut from 0, rather than a boost. Take it all the way up to get your true 2v out.

    The other thing is they have very low pre-amp voltage, across the board. May need to adjust the gains on both your mids/highs amp and sub amp. They do normally have impeccable SQ, however, and seems to be the reason so many people like them.

    I recently swapped to a Pioneer deck to get full speed iPod access (my alpine is ancient and uses that old system for CD changer control), and it took me quite a while to get used to the sound. It was much harsher on the highs, but it definitely got louder, and was 2x the pre-amp voltage.

    I have no idea what year the model Alpine you have is, but I have heard stories that new Alpine units just don't have the output that new models of other brands do. I would definitely recommend playing with everything a bit before writing it off though, and definitely look into the imprint system. From what I've heard, it's what makes the newer units act like the old ones did (in other words Alpine took out all of their goodies that used to make them sweet in order to compete price-wise with other companies)



    Stupid Loud.

  11. #11
    07maximan's Avatar
    07maximan is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Temecula Ca.
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    Thanks for your relies guys. I have a PXA H100 coming today so I'll play with that and see what happens. I didn't get the mic because a lot of people say the results from auto calibration aren't that great. If I need it I'll get it later.




  12. #12
    zako's Avatar
    zako is offline CarAudio.com Elite



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    I am happy with Kenwood KDC-x994. It's very similar to x993 and x995. I could nitpick here and there, but overall it's a fine package for the money. Time alignment, bluetooth, three 4v preouts, configurable display text fields, many crossover frequency and slope options.




  13. #13
    keep_hope_alive's Avatar
    keep_hope_alive is offline Acoustics Engineer keep_hope_alive is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities, IL
    Posts
    5,913
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    28
    Mentioned
    158 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    I've been running Alpine for over 15 years. I've tried the other major brands but I always go back. Eclipse was one that I also really liked. Lately I've been impressed by Kenwood, especially the eXcelon series. I think Kenwood is doing a better job than Alpine now. Alpine has gotten away from integrated processing and the output voltage is weak. The Kenwood units i've installed have been great. I like the styling of Alpine, but that is pure personal preference.

    Imprint can make a decent system better. it cannot fix problems associated with poor installation.



    have you been helped by me? i'd love to know. shoot me a PM.

    My 2014 Accord build log: http://mobileaudioforum.com/forum/showthread.php?6722-KHA-2014-Accord-Sport-SQ-Factory-Integration
    *My 2001 Accord build log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/536049-2001-accord-ex-sedan-its-long.html
    *2005 Scion tC Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/516096-2005-scion-tc-sq-hertz-audison-pioneer-build-log.html
    *1998 Astro Van Build Log: http://www.caraudio.com/forums/car-audio-build-logs-cars-trucks-suvs/567468-kha-does-spl-build-1996-astro-van.html

  14. #14
    papermaker's Avatar
    papermaker is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lafayatte,LA
    Posts
    2,345
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    my x991 is a sweet deck.. three sac on for front one for rear and one for sub24/24/1bit)
    it's the nicest deck next to the truly nice 3ways decks the prs99 and old school clarion 925 I believe it was..
    I've been a pioneer fan for 10 years never really cared for anything else buy I live my kenwood..



    knowledge is powerful but imagination is exponentially powerful..

    experience is key!! otherwise life is boring, uneventful and pointless..

    sub amps RD audio 1750s(SD3500 when i sell the RDs)---better audio prototypes
    mids CDT ES-6--tweeters CDT ES-02
    comp amp SD sax100.4D(for sale looking for a zapco 1000.4)
    deck..execlon x991

  15. #15
    papermaker's Avatar
    papermaker is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lafayatte,LA
    Posts
    2,345
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Kenwood vs. Alpine

    my x991 is a sweet deck.. three sac on for front one for rear and one for sub24/24/1bit)
    it's the nicest deck next to the truly nice 3ways decks the prs99 and old school clarion 925 I believe it was..
    I've been a pioneer fan for 10 years never really cared for anything else buy I live my kenwood..



    knowledge is powerful but imagination is exponentially powerful..

    experience is key!! otherwise life is boring, uneventful and pointless..

    sub amps RD audio 1750s(SD3500 when i sell the RDs)---better audio prototypes
    mids CDT ES-6--tweeters CDT ES-02
    comp amp SD sax100.4D(for sale looking for a zapco 1000.4)
    deck..execlon x991

Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum