Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Reload Thread: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

  1. #1
    Mugen's Avatar
    Mugen is offline Superhero.



    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Walker, LA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    990
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Personally, I like the way the 780MP looks, and it seems that it has a full color screen, whereas the 880PRS doesn't. So, what makes the 880PRS better? Just overall better SQ? The also seem to cost about the same (no more than $20 difference).

    I really like the way both look, but I think I like the way the 780MP looks better.







  2. #2
    Eugenics's Avatar
    Eugenics is offline Princess



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arbys
    Posts
    23,904
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    get the 980 then



    crunktimes . com/ct

  3. #3
    Mugen's Avatar
    Mugen is offline Superhero.

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Walker, LA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    990
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    But the 980 costs more. I was just wondering what the main difference in the two was since their price is so close.




  4. #4
    DoobieBrother's Avatar
    DoobieBrother is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Frisco, TX
    Posts
    288
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Pioneer has a nice feature comparison tool on their site.

    That said, 880 is better if you ever intend to go active. Looks are subjective. I think the 880 looks better. Course it also depends on what car it's going into. I find the 880 controls easier with the two knobs as well. Also, the 880 has different Burr Brown DAC's than all the others. I believe they are referred to as Burr Brown + or some such. Not sure what kind of difference it makes. 880 has more EQ capability. And in general is supposed to be the best and most features (sans Blue Tooth) you can get without getting into the really expensive units.



    Bluto's right. Psychotic, but absolutely right. We gotta take these bastards. Now we could do it with conventional weapons that could take years and cost millions of lives. No, I think we have to go all out. I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part.

  5. #5
    Towncar's Avatar
    Towncar is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    who knows
    Posts
    4,346
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenics View Post
    get the 980 then
    980= 780 with blue tooth. No aditional sq advantages.



    Quote Originally Posted by Terranova View Post
    The gain is set around 750 right now. I need to get together with my buddy and plug his stethoscope in to set it to 1000.
    Quote Originally Posted by infamous_e46 View Post
    Start fcking one of the guys in the *** to make her jealous

  6. #6
    faulkton's Avatar
    faulkton is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    neverland
    Posts
    22,095
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by DoobieBrother View Post
    Pioneer has a nice feature comparison tool on their site.

    That said, 880 is better if you ever intend to go active. Looks are subjective. I think the 880 looks better. Course it also depends on what car it's going into. I find the 880 controls easier with the two knobs as well. Also, the 880 has different Burr Brown DAC's than all the others. I believe they are referred to as Burr Brown + or some such. Not sure what kind of difference it makes. 880 has more EQ capability. And in general is supposed to be the best and most features (sans Blue Tooth) you can get without getting into the really expensive units.
    where did you read that?



    pretty funnay eugy

  7. #7
    Mugen's Avatar
    Mugen is offline Superhero.

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Walker, LA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    990
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Well, I don't really know how to properly use all the fancy EQ stuff that the 880PRS has anyway, so I guess the 780MP would be better for me. I like the 880PRS, but it's too plain.




  8. #8
    adam71's Avatar
    adam71 is offline P9 = Ultimate SQ



    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    5,795
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by DoobieBrother View Post
    That said, 880 is better if you ever intend to go active. Looks are subjective. I think the 880 looks better. Course it also depends on what car it's going into. I find the 880 controls easier with the two knobs as well. Also, the 880 has different Burr Brown DAC's than all the others. I believe they are referred to as Burr Brown + or some such. Not sure what kind of difference it makes. 880 has more EQ capability. And in general is supposed to be the best and most features (sans Blue Tooth) you can get without getting into the really expensive units.
    Actually the others do NOT have Burr Browns at all, they just have DACs. Besides the 880, the P9 is the only other single din Pioneer head unit that uses Burr Brown DACs.





    I stand corrected. According to the Pioneer website the 780, 880, 980 and the P9 all use Burr-Brown DACs.
    Last edited by adam71; 10-23-2006 at 11:32 AM. Reason: I was mistaken.



    Source Unit: Pioneer P9 combo
    Tweeters: CDT DRT-25 Silk
    Mids: CDT ES-5 (5.25")
    Midbass: CDT M6 (6.5")
    Subs: Pioneer TS-W12PRS
    Mid & Tweet amp: Pioneer PRS-X340
    Midbass Amp: Pioneer PRS-X720
    Sub Amp: Pioneer PRS-X720

  9. #9
    adam71's Avatar
    adam71 is offline P9 = Ultimate SQ



    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    5,795
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
    Well, I don't really know how to properly use all the fancy EQ stuff that the 880PRS has anyway, so I guess the 780MP would be better for me. I like the 880PRS, but it's too plain.
    Well, the 880 is hands down a higher quality head unit. My good friend installs Premier in a local shop and he let me go in the stock room and the 880 even feels heavier than the 780. The weight may not make it a better souding head unit but it does mean they used less plastic on the inside. I also see your 17 years old and may not see things the same way as some us old bastards on the forum. I've had my days of colorful screens and animations and don't care for them anymore. My P9 is just as much if not MORE plain than the 880. It all comes down to what YOU like seeing how you're the one spending the money. If you like the looks of the 780 then go for the 780. While the 780 may not be as high quality as the 880 you will NOT be sorry for going with it.



    Source Unit: Pioneer P9 combo
    Tweeters: CDT DRT-25 Silk
    Mids: CDT ES-5 (5.25")
    Midbass: CDT M6 (6.5")
    Subs: Pioneer TS-W12PRS
    Mid & Tweet amp: Pioneer PRS-X340
    Midbass Amp: Pioneer PRS-X720
    Sub Amp: Pioneer PRS-X720

  10. #10
    DoobieBrother's Avatar
    DoobieBrother is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Frisco, TX
    Posts
    288
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by faulkton View Post
    where did you read that?
    On the back of the Pioneer advertisement brochure I got before I went and bought mine.



    Bluto's right. Psychotic, but absolutely right. We gotta take these bastards. Now we could do it with conventional weapons that could take years and cost millions of lives. No, I think we have to go all out. I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part.

  11. #11
    Mugen's Avatar
    Mugen is offline Superhero.

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Walker, LA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    990
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Yea, I like pretty color screens, and this will be just about the best HU I've ever had, like ever. I actually might go with the 680MP though, because then I can get better mids. I'm just gonna save up and when the time comes see how much I have (I'm shooting for $500 for the HU, mids (component 6.5"s) and an amp for them. Then again, this may be a good christmas gift...




  12. #12
    Ahaz's Avatar
    Ahaz is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by Towncar View Post
    980= 780 with blue tooth. No aditional sq advantages.
    The 980 has auto EQ and auto T/A, where the 780 does not, for what it's worth. If you don't care about auto EQ, auto T/A, separate L/R EQ, and going active, then go with which one you like better. They're about the same price.




  13. #13
    Mugen's Avatar
    Mugen is offline Superhero.

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Walker, LA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    990
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    What does it mean to "go active"? And really, the most EQ tuning I ever do is to get the highs to be not so harsh (assuming they are). For the most part, I usually just leave it flat.




  14. #14
    Ahaz's Avatar
    Ahaz is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mugen View Post
    What does it mean to "go active"? And really, the most EQ tuning I ever do is to get the highs to be not so harsh (assuming they are). For the most part, I usually just leave it flat.
    Ha, I'm just getting into all that myself, but I think all this is right...

    Active is basically using processing, on the head unit in this case, as the crossover for all your speakers. So no physical crossover in the door or trunk that came with your comps, and no crossover set on the amp.

    The 780 will have an HPF for the front speakers and the rear speakers, and a LPF for the sub.

    The 880 will have a HPF for the tweeters, a HPF and a LPF (bandpass, in other words) for the mids, and a LPF for the sub. So rear speakers don't really factor into that. You would also need two amps for your comps, one for the mids and one for the tweeters, since there would be no crossover to split the amp output anymore. The 880 can be set to run passive (it's a physical switch on the back of the deck, so I've heard), where it will then behave like the 780.

    With an active setup, you can set the crossover points wherever you want them. Having each speaker playing the exact ranges you want adds a deep level to your overall sound customization, but it's not something that you really need or would find worth the money if you don't like to spend lots of time tweaking your settings.




  15. #15
    dkguitarist's Avatar
    dkguitarist is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    Age
    29
    Posts
    5,013
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Pioneer 880PRS > 780MP?

    also you can adjust the crossover slopes as well.

    alot of the component sets that come with pre-defined crossovers are PASSIVE CROSSOVERS so no tweaking is really involved.

    active is alot more involved. also instead of using 2 2 channel amps, you can use a 4 channel amp as well. or just use 1 2 channel amp and run the tweets of the headunit. tweeters don't need alot of power to really get running. most are 10-15 watts anyways. that's how i'm gonna run mine.



    2003 Chevy Cavalier
    HU:880PRS - SUB AMP: IA 20.1 - SUB: 13w7 (15" 05 XXX awaiting new box)

    FOR SALE: USHER 9950 TWEETERS, USAMPS HCA-25 2 CHANNEL, XXX XBL^2 6.5" MIDS, Kicker KX300.2 amp

    Refs: zachzchw, AcidicDreams, Mr Tibbs, Mr Teacha, vetkilr, Blunt, Showrides, Mihklo, QtrHorse, vosschs, nvruckus, jeeper07, sakura, iceteebone, 2loud4u, eatank, brents, bookechu, young_gun, maldecido33, pickup1, angryeric116, go_go_thrash, gentlejax, superblack350z, and 100% ebay feedback. (dkguitarist454)

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum