Photo's in opening post folks
Printable View
Photo's in opening post folks
Very low Q on those. I would think a coil with that much MMS would have to hold more than 800W thermal power, no? 3" or 2.5?
Anyway, I don't suppose you have a Shocker Neo sig motor laying around for sale do you? I'm in the market for one more and I know you have some rare TC built goodies hidden away.
2.5 65mm ww copper, thick cone too, but thats less mms than alot of 12's out, and more bl than 85% of subs on the market (stronger than an lms ultra), and this one has more Sd than average, cutout will be close to 11.5"Quote:
Originally Posted by hispls
Definitely a huge BL. How tight is the gap?Quote:
Originally Posted by audio_phill
No neo motor for me? Don't be greedy if you have one ;)
Idea on that is to raise BL, Sens, and Transience as well as give it a dip in response to counter the spike created by Le so it plays flatter and more naturally with little to no eq. (something few places take into consideration) You can count on 1dB of spike near 2x Fs per 1mH of le, this sub has an le of 3.7, so in optimum enclosure it has 3.04dB of loss near the le spike freq's. Should be able to stay within .5dB of flat (except on nodes) from 30 to 70(maybe higher) Given it wont feel or sound like it thanks to its large Vas once port volume becomes charged and should allow some pull in the bottom octaves as well to ease the burden on the system to achieve tactility below 40Hz and give it an audibly flat response. At least thats my goal and I have had killer results with this theory with my current single low Q 8" setup.Quote:
Originally Posted by hispls
---------- Post added at 01:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:17 AM ----------
I'm off to bed, night folks.
When are the first ones expected?
My brain just melted.Quote:
Originally Posted by audio_phill
Oh but subs look great FYI
lol, good thing brain cells regenerate, maybe it will reform!Quote:
Originally Posted by TreyE
The look is interesting. Very straight forward, but functional. If you stare at it...it grows on you a bit lol...
Build time to delivery is 45days, Still in delegation with the company, have already contacted them this am, their shipping quote was way more than expected so I'm now trying to see why and if there's a way to offset the raise in my cost.Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelfromva
---------- Post added at 11:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 AM ----------
Everything except that mesh lolQuote:
Originally Posted by pro-rabbit
lol Yea, that mesh is meh a bit...seems flashy for the rest of it... maybe do it in black?Quote:
Originally Posted by audio_phill
Contact with them is slow, One email a day at this point, usually 9:30am our time... So maybe tomorrow I will have a total to give everyone.
I pondered the same thing, but think best option is to remove it completely, I like unobstructed views of the coils in woofersQuote:
Originally Posted by pro-rabbit
Isn't the mesh somewhat functional to keep debris out of the gap? Not like I feel that having mesh has ever saved a woofer for me (or not having it has killed one), but isn't that the theory?Quote:
Originally Posted by audio_phill
Also I notice you're dodging the neo motor question.... :eyebrow: just saying, buddy, if you want to raise a little dough to help with freight on these, I can always come up with cash for one.
I didnt see a neo motor question??? And the cost of neo is more than the reduction of weight shipping cost change, and they are already pretty light @ just over 19lbs. The mesh was a theory, but open pole vents kinda makes the mesh pointless since debris can enter the pole vent and get inside the coil lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by hispls