User Tag List

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Reload Thread: Dynamat and my sealed box

  1. #1
    merlinski's Avatar
    merlinski is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Dynamat and my sealed box

    I'm building a sealed box to house 2 IDQ12D4V.2's. The normal sealed box volume for these subs of the IDQ site is .85 cu. ft., which is the volume I'm looking for. I'm building a trapezoidal box with these dimensions:

    slanted wall: 15" tall
    top: 4.818"
    bottom: 8.798"
    rear wall: 14.489"
    depth: 14.836" per sub
    angle of tilt: 75 degrees (15 off vertical)

    I know these figures are insanely precise but I want to be as precise as possible. I have a few questions. First, would it be better to seperate the two subwoofer chambers, with each having a volume of .85 cu ft, or to make one large chamber for both subs with a volume of 1.7 cu ft?

    My other question is regarding the material. I know I'm going to build it out of MDF, but I'm thinking of going with two sheets of 3/8 inch MDF with a layer of dynamat sandwiched in the middle. I'm only going to have my current car for 2 more months, so I don't think it's worth dynamatting the interior. The interior SA of the box is 10.95 sq. ft.

    Is it a good idea to use the 2 sheet and dynamat construction, or will this just be a waste of dynamat?

    Also, for this project, would it be better to use ordinary dynamat or dynamat xtreme, or something more obscure like dynaliner or extremeliner?







  2. #2
    negativezeroz's Avatar
    negativezeroz is offline Nothing Is Promised



    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    -salad fingers-
    Age
    26
    Posts
    4,900
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Dynamat and my sealed box

    y would u put dynamat inside the box? to get vibration down?




  3. #3
    jujumantb's Avatar
    jujumantb is offline Duke of Earl



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Madison, Wi
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,417
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Dynamat and my sealed box

    Two chambers is always better, though not necessary, dont use dynamat like that. Dynamat is a vibration dampener, it adds mass to the panels you put it on to stop vibration, it can also insulate the sound from escaping through it the same way. There is no reason to use it in any way in the construction of a box.




  4. #4
    merlinski's Avatar
    merlinski is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    7
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Dynamat and my sealed box

    Quote Originally Posted by jujumantb
    Two chambers is always better, though not necessary, dont use dynamat like that. Dynamat is a vibration dampener, it adds mass to the panels you put it on to stop vibration, it can also insulate the sound from escaping through it the same way. There is no reason to use it in any way in the construction of a box.
    That's the reason I want to use it in the box - to stop resonance from interfering with my sub and to stop the vibration of the box.




  5. #5
    jujumantb's Avatar
    jujumantb is offline Duke of Earl



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Madison, Wi
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,417
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Re: Dynamat and my sealed box

    Your box wont vibrate if build correctly and you dont have to worry about resonance with subs. Standing waves is one thing it could help with but that is only if your box is a perfect cube and even then its been argued by extremely intelligent people that standing waves have no affect on bass.




Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum