ok, i know for pure SPL you want as much port area as possible but does having large amounts of port area decrease SQ? even if its tuned low-ish like 34hz

ok, i know for pure SPL you want as much port area as possible but does having large amounts of port area decrease SQ? even if its tuned low-ish like 34hz
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()
No, as a matter of fact, the greater the cross-sectional area of the port, the less chuffing there is at higher excursions, so you get more music and less noise.
EDIT: And I wouldn't say 34Hz is a "low" tuning point, either. It isn't too high, but something like 20-25Hz is low.

34 is pretty low I mean I dont know too many people who have the woofer in their car tuned below 30Hz.
Eclipse 8445|Alpine Type X 137r|Diamond D5 300.2/1200.1|ID 10v.3|
Refs: KARLEON, sephiroth619, SiX, Showrides, angrytrucker78, davidfre21, Relax, Slammed
He who laughs last is usually the slowest...

i didn't mean that 34 was low, it was just a number to put up, but so basically if you can get 400 square inches of port, it'd be good?
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()

Yea itd be good but nearly impossible to do.
Eclipse 8445|Alpine Type X 137r|Diamond D5 300.2/1200.1|ID 10v.3|
Refs: KARLEON, sephiroth619, SiX, Showrides, angrytrucker78, davidfre21, Relax, Slammed
He who laughs last is usually the slowest...

why? ...10char
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()

bump......
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()
larger port area means you need a longer port
for example in a box thats 4 cubes after displacement tuned to 34 hz with a 10"x10" port it needs to be 49.82" long (winisd)
in that same box with a port thats 40"x10" the port needs to be 210.25" long
so 400 sq inches of port area is pretty impractical, but I suppose you could do it if you wanted to
Last edited by Benny212; 04-29-2004 at 11:30 PM. Reason: left some stuff out

this isn't going in a Civic or anything, just theory... so it is possible? just need a hugely long port?
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()

I've heard you actually start going downhill after the port area gets larger then the cone area, So 400 sq. inches would be a waste

alrighty, that's what i wanted to knowOriginally Posted by RMKrider1
so the port area shouldn't be larger than the cone area of all sub(s) combined?
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()

I think thats right.......BUT I have no proof to back this up!! I've only heard this mentioned a few times.
Maybe rangerman or bigbassman will read this and help out

thanks for your help, i hope one of those guys could give me a definite answer
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()
Im pretty sure I've heard Lloyd say that for spl comp. you want to have the port area to equal Sd
Words of wisdom:
"you don't need ohms to make a sub loud. trust me."
My System:
HU: *stolen
Speakers: CDT CL-61a
Speaker amp: HiFonics Hawk
Sub: Magnum D2 15
Sub amp: HiFonics BX1500D
Box: 4.3cu.ft. tuned to 30hz
My Car:
Link

Sd is cone area? and Sd of all subs combined?
MdOiDcEtRaAtToOrR
1996 Chevrolet Impala SS 14.5 @ 94
1967 Chevrolet Camaro 18.4 @ 74
![]()
Bookmarks