+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Reload Thread: 2 MMAT procasts design?

  1. #1
    ace_800's Avatar
    ace_800 is online now CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    tucson, az
    Age
    32
    Posts
    4,992
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)

    2 MMAT procasts design?

    Would this work? Sorry for shitty design, at work...



    @Buck ; @double 07 ; @pro-rabbit ; @TaylorFade ;



    Current set up: 2010 Buick Enclave, 2 12" MMATS PROCASTS 2.5@35, MMATS D200HC
    Hertz 165XL comps in front door, Eclipse XA4000(switching to Alpine 1507)
    Pioneer Z150bt Nav, Audio Technix all around.

    66 Pontiac GTO, modified stock radio, Xtant 3150x, Trubass 8", Kicker KS6.5's in the front kicks.

    Feedback...http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=287960&highlight=ace_800




  2. #2
    pro-rabbit's Avatar
    pro-rabbit is online now Moderator pro-rabbit is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    pro-rabbit is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    348 Post(s)

    Re: 2 MMAT procasts design?

    Looks like you are wanting a more SPL style port and then another more daily port the slides it in. If that this the case, then yes, that idea will work. I didn't do any math to check tuning or anything...but the idea works.




  3. #3
    ace_800's Avatar
    ace_800 is online now CarAudio.com Veteran

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    tucson, az
    Age
    32
    Posts
    4,992
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)

    Re: 2 MMAT procasts design?

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-rabbit View Post
    Looks like you are wanting a more SPL style port and then another more daily port the slides it in. If that this the case, then yes, that idea will work. I didn't do any math to check tuning or anything...but the idea works.
    Correct, I'm getting 4.9^3 from the12volt off those specs and with a 5" port @48hz would be 9.3" and 2.5" port @34 for be 11.25"



    Current set up: 2010 Buick Enclave, 2 12" MMATS PROCASTS 2.5@35, MMATS D200HC
    Hertz 165XL comps in front door, Eclipse XA4000(switching to Alpine 1507)
    Pioneer Z150bt Nav, Audio Technix all around.

    66 Pontiac GTO, modified stock radio, Xtant 3150x, Trubass 8", Kicker KS6.5's in the front kicks.

    Feedback...http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=287960&highlight=ace_800

  4. #4
    pro-rabbit's Avatar
    pro-rabbit is online now Moderator pro-rabbit is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    pro-rabbit is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,077
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    348 Post(s)

    Re: 2 MMAT procasts design?

    What are the port hxw? Seems rather small for port area.




  5. #5
    TaylorFade's Avatar
    TaylorFade is online now I fail.



    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La.
    Posts
    2,631
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    131 Post(s)

    Re: 2 MMAT procasts design?

    I'm good with it. I wonder why more people don't do this, actually.

    TaylorPro has an interchangeable port. I can't recall exactly how much louder the SPL alignment is, but it's significant. Funny thing though... his SPL port actually peaks lower than his daily port. But it's still louder. Why? Impedance rise.

    I've said it about 9,473 times. You don't tune to a specific freq. You tune for impedance rise. You vehicle is going to peak where it's going to peak. I don't understand why people feel the need to force it to a specific frequency when they could be missing out on thousands of watts by doing so.

    But having an interchangeable port, testing will be easy. Do the daily where you want it and don't get hung up on the "tune" for the SPL one. Just test different sizes and lengths until you find your sweet spot.



    Quote Originally Posted by eCrack View Post
    TaylorFail
    Quote Originally Posted by Suicide Bobb View Post
    Taylorfail, v.2
    Quote Originally Posted by Imtjnotu View Post
    tailorFail v.3
    Quote Originally Posted by brodeisel View Post
    TaylorFail v.4
    Quote Originally Posted by tat2bass View Post
    TaylorWin v.1?

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. mmats???digital designs??? which is better
    By chapy4650 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-28-2002, 10:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum