Closed Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Reload Thread: a couple ?'s for a new box!

  1. #31
    RangerDangerV2's Avatar
    RangerDangerV2 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    st cloud MN
    Posts
    4,868
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-rabbit View Post
    That is not true, most like subs/port down more then anything.
    I can pee farther than you.



    1999 Tahoe
    2 sa12s
    4th order
    145.18 @33z... with less than 500 watts!




  2. #32
    pro-rabbit's Avatar
    pro-rabbit is offline Moderator pro-rabbit is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    pro-rabbit is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,395
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by RangerDanger View Post
    im talking about the fact that you cannot come at me about strength when you cannot properly draw the joints on an enclosure. I dont care about the design, it was never used. and btw, you wanted to do port on the top, yeah, that would have failed miserably in mwspl. just and fyi for your future skams. dustin is a scammer and a horrible person to deal with. he eats babies and loves to ride small black children around so he doesnt have to walk. he is actually kevin from skar.
    I don't remember what org it was designed for, but I do know the port at the top was the better option, there was even a thread where snoop and I discussed it.

    As for the joints, it was designed and would have worked 100% fine. I have said this many times now.




  3. #33
    RangerDangerV2's Avatar
    RangerDangerV2 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    st cloud MN
    Posts
    4,868
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-rabbit View Post
    I don't remember what org it was designed for, but I do know the port at the top was the better option, there was even a thread where snoop and I discussed it.

    As for the joints, it was designed and would have worked 100% fine. I have said this many times now.
    ok... lmao the goal of mwspl is to create pressure on one side of the vehicle. which a top port will not do.



    1999 Tahoe
    2 sa12s
    4th order
    145.18 @33z... with less than 500 watts!

  4. #34
    pro-rabbit's Avatar
    pro-rabbit is offline Moderator pro-rabbit is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    pro-rabbit is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,395
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by RangerDanger View Post
    ok... lmao the goal of mwspl is to create pressure on one side of the vehicle. which a top port will not do.
    I would have to look through emails to see what we discussed. I just remember what ever you told me port at the top was what I suggested for your application.




  5. #35
    splwj47's Avatar
    splwj47 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Great White North
    Age
    25
    Posts
    2,674
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    look at all the post dumping. and by a mod to. cool story fegs.



    2003 JEEP Grand Cherokee
    HU- pioneer 80prs
    Front Stage- Tantric HD comps.
    FS Amp- B2 Quattro
    Sub Amp-B2 Zero1
    Subs- Tantric HDD 12's
    box - 4.5^3 32hz

  6. #36
    RangerDangerV2's Avatar
    RangerDangerV2 is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    st cloud MN
    Posts
    4,868
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by pro-rabbit View Post
    I would have to look through emails to see what we discussed. I just remember what ever you told me port at the top was what I suggested for your application.
    and I ASKED if you could do port center or port to the side. not demanded.



    1999 Tahoe
    2 sa12s
    4th order
    145.18 @33z... with less than 500 watts!

  7. #37
    pro-rabbit's Avatar
    pro-rabbit is offline Moderator pro-rabbit is a Supporting Member of the forum!

    pro-rabbit is a Supporting Vendor of the forum!

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,395
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)

    Re: a couple ?'s for a new box!

    Quote Originally Posted by RangerDanger View Post
    and I ASKED if you could do port center or port to the side. not demanded.
    I told you the truth..then you told me what you wanted after I informed of what I thought.

    ---------- Post added at 10:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by splwj47 View Post
    look at all the post dumping. and by a mod to. cool story fegs.
    This is true, ranger take to the dome if you want to keep up this convo...other wise leave this thread to the OP and his questions.




Closed Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. time for a new box!!!!
    By AlpineUser in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-03-2006, 07:56 PM
  2. i need some deminsions for a new box
    By robbie_tubbs in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-05-2005, 04:12 PM
  3. time for a new box.....I ThiNK!?
    By Bavarian3 in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-05-2003, 02:09 AM
  4. any suggestions on what to do for my new box??
    By bumpin_blazer in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-07-2002, 09:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum