Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Reload Thread: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

  1. #1
    Trixter's Avatar
    Trixter is offline Keepin it Simple



    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,608
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    I have used WinISD to do most of my box building. I have heard that it is not that accurate and to try using this:

    http://www.loudspeakers101.com/VentCal1.htm

    Between loudspeakers101 and WInISD the numbers are pretty different. Another thing I don't understand about the loudspeakers101 calculator, is the slot and square option. I know the difference. But look at the JL web site. (http://www.loudspeakers101.com/VentCal1.htm) It says to add 1/2 the port's width to it's length for the correction factor and loudspeaker101's calculator subtracts 1/2 of the port's width from it's length when the slot option is selected.

    So, between these three resources, who is correct?? Am I better off to stop using calculators and go back to using the the formula, pencil, and paper??



    2006 Jeep Liberty
    Adire Audio, Cadence, Clarion, MB Quart

    Lv = [(14630000 x R^2) / (Fb^2 x Vb)] - 1.463R
    *Vb = vol. in cu"
    **R = sq.rt. A / Pi (for square/slot port)




  2. #2
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    well, cant go wrong with pencil and paper... its just a pain in the ***. Try figuring out which program follows the formula and then use that program.




  3. #3
    Trixter's Avatar
    Trixter is offline Keepin it Simple

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,608
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    Well, on paper, I have found out that loudspeakers101 is correct as far as their port length claculator goes.

    Now, who is correct about the correction factor?? I also think that loudspeakers101 is...after talking to a few people...you DO subtract for correction factor and DO NOT add like jlaudio says.

    I know that there are people out there that know a lot more about box building than me. Where are you guys??



    2006 Jeep Liberty
    Adire Audio, Cadence, Clarion, MB Quart

    Lv = [(14630000 x R^2) / (Fb^2 x Vb)] - 1.463R
    *Vb = vol. in cu"
    **R = sq.rt. A / Pi (for square/slot port)

  4. #4
    ryanc's Avatar
    ryanc is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    It would make sense to subtract rather than to add the correction factor. JL Audio explains that it is because one wall of the port is usually a wall of the box, "effectively adding length to the port". So since having it on the wall adds length, it would only make sense to correct that by subtracting 1/2 of h from the length of the port.




  5. #5
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    Oh, I see, WinISD gives you the effective port length, whereas that other program gives you the physical length that you should make your port




  6. #6
    nweibley's Avatar
    nweibley is offline this:annoyinginsomanyways



    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Age
    28
    Posts
    471
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    WinISD also won't compensate and recalculate for driver displacement. I know www.bcae1.com does though. If you use their calc and plug the 'with displacment' volume in, they both churn out nearly identical lengths.



    If my Avatar doesn't make sense to you: Click Here
    hakuna matata

  7. #7
    Jim Boom's Avatar
    Jim Boom is offline Physical Sound Waves



    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    MON
    Posts
    1,175
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    so which program is right?




  8. #8
    Trixter's Avatar
    Trixter is offline Keepin it Simple

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,608
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    Well, after all this I am using loudspeakers101's calc. I tried to use the calc. on bcae but I always got an error message. But whichever, if I have one that works, I'll stick with it.

    It not good to see how many people are reffered to the jl site and to see it be incorrect.



    2006 Jeep Liberty
    Adire Audio, Cadence, Clarion, MB Quart

    Lv = [(14630000 x R^2) / (Fb^2 x Vb)] - 1.463R
    *Vb = vol. in cu"
    **R = sq.rt. A / Pi (for square/slot port)

  9. #9
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    well, I don't think the people who programmed winISD would make such a blatant mistake in such a good program... or why a reputable company like JL would give faulty advice? I'd like to hear what someone like Donn has to say about this.

    example: box that is 1.5 cubes AFTER displacement tuned with a slot port to 30 hz with the port dimensions being 2"X10"
    WinISD gives a port length of 34.75
    paper and pencil gives a length of 36.2003
    dont know what the other program comes up with or BCAE because I dont have the program and don't know how to use BCAE's calc, so why is there the discrepency?

    lets just keep bumping up this post till someone knowledgable answers it.




  10. #10
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    oh, BTW the formula I used for the "Paper and pencil" calc was from JL's port tutorial




  11. #11
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    sorry bout so many posts, but I just tried out WinISD pro and it gave a different length for that same box,
    WinISD pro 36.07" long




  12. #12
    Bill T.'s Avatar
    Bill T. is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    320
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    Using loudspeakers101's calc:

    For 8 cu/ft after displacement, 35Hz tuning, 100 sq/in of port area: I came up with a length of 14.25".

    That sound about right? I keep coming up with low 20"s with WINisd.

    Bill T.



    2003 VW Jetta Variant
    Factory HU
    JL 300/4 & 1000/1
    Stinger 1/0 and wiring
    CDT cL-61a in front & rear

    Still planning for super bass...

  13. #13
    Trixter's Avatar
    Trixter is offline Keepin it Simple

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,608
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    Here is the calc. that I used that is dead on with loudspeakers101:

    Lv = [(1.463 x 10^7 x R^2) / (Fb^2 x Vb)] - 1.463 x R

    If using a square or slot vent then R = sq.rt. (A / Pi)

    They also subtract 1/2 the port's width when choosing the slot port option.

    I have not yet figured out the exact difference between WinISD and loudspeakers101's calcs. And I also do not know, and con not prove, what formula WinISD uses.



    2006 Jeep Liberty
    Adire Audio, Cadence, Clarion, MB Quart

    Lv = [(14630000 x R^2) / (Fb^2 x Vb)] - 1.463R
    *Vb = vol. in cu"
    **R = sq.rt. A / Pi (for square/slot port)

  14. #14
    Bill T.'s Avatar
    Bill T. is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    320
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    I had much sucess building my first slot port with WINisd. I would recommend using the newest release 50a7. The loudspeaker101 site works but you dont see the gain. But if you know exactly what you want, thats the calculator to use. I typed in my box on loudspeaker101s and WINisd a7.. my actual length is 27", loudspeaker came up with 26" and WINisd came up with 27.5". I had my numbers checked by RE and they said it gains 3.5db at 33Hz. Bingo, WINisd is nearly right.

    Whats the relation between net volume and vent gain? Just messing around and accidently typed in 10 cu/ft for a single XXX15" and it was gaining 9db @ 42Hz.

    Also, whats the 1st port resonance mean?

    Bill T.



    2003 VW Jetta Variant
    Factory HU
    JL 300/4 & 1000/1
    Stinger 1/0 and wiring
    CDT cL-61a in front & rear

    Still planning for super bass...

  15. #15
    Benny212's Avatar
    Benny212 is offline Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Loveland Colorado
    Posts
    126
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Port Calculator Discrepencies??? Who Is Right???

    well, it sounds like the two programs are using completely different equations, I got a copy of Loudspeaker Design Cookbook by Vance Dickason coming in soon, that's the equation I'll trust.

    Bill, net volume and gain on the low end are related, as the box gets bigger you gain low end but it lowers power handling and can cause a "boomy" sound. No clue what 1st port resonance means. might be because you can use winISD for 6th order bandpass, so the tuning frequency for the other chamber would be labeled as "second port resonance" but I am probably wrong.




Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. hertz
    By Reference01 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-22-2004, 07:37 PM
  2. help with port pls
    By Bring97 in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-19-2004, 11:36 PM
  3. figuring out port tuning
    By Matador in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-26-2004, 05:32 PM
  4. extreme port?!?
    By yourmomonacid in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-18-2003, 12:35 AM
  5. How to tune a box?
    By KJL_21 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-04-2003, 01:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum