Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Reload Thread: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

  1. #1
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    So right now im using a 15 RE SRx giving it double RMS.

    My box is around 3.2 net cu ft, @ 30 hz or so, with a 3" PVC pipe port. Yes there is port noise and it sounds bad and not that tight when loud.

    So what should I give it? RE web says 3cu ft. If I could go smaller but get slightly less volume (but more useable since it sounds cleaner) id rather do that.







  2. #2
    aeroportspwn's Avatar
    aeroportspwn is offline mmmm aeroports



    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    335
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Quote Originally Posted by way2sl0 View Post
    So right now im using a 15 RE SRx giving it double RMS.

    My box is around 3.2 net cu ft, @ 30 hz or so, with a 3" PVC pipe port. Yes there is port noise and it sounds bad and not that tight when loud.

    So what should I give it? RE web says 3cu ft. If I could go smaller but get slightly less volume (but more useable since it sounds cleaner) id rather do that.
    I am the one that sent you the pm saying your old box port was way to small while no one else caught it lol. Just follow the specs I gave you, I can't remember exactly what they were.



    refs on here: bought from PioneerSPL1990, amartin_72, fasfocus00, Kowboy | Sold to evildave101, Louisiana_CRX, KAC1023, Zachfeen, ds0110 | refs on caco: 72impala, super_duper, KAC1023, tandrel | refs on ebay: my username is chevy-guy87


  3. #3
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    yes I thank you for your response. I know you said im probably running one 4 now, and I should be running two. Well im running one three, and I don't want as large a box either, since I have the sub gain down all the time anyways. I want the flattest response in the smallest enclosure possible. I don't have access or want to buy aero ports, so I am thinking ill just make a box with a square port. I still need a good box outline though.




  4. #4
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Ok well I am plugging the numbers and trying to make this myself. A little difficult. I am using these calcs; Subwoofer Enclosure Calculators, Fraction to Decimal, Parallel, Series, Port Length and Volume Calculators

    So I calculate the box, 36 x 17 x 10" = 2.63 cu ft internal (0.75" mdf)

    So then I say in port calc, ill make it 3 inches opening, and 15.5" high (height - thickness of the two top pieces of wood)
    It says my port needs to be 22.88"

    So I am guessing my port would be two pieces. The first would be 4.25", which leaves me 3" diameter throughout it (8"-0.75=7.25") and my second piece would be 22.88-4.25= 18.55" - 0.75" from the 1st piece, so 17.8"

    Ok but now here is where I am stuck. That is a big internal port, and I have lost more internal space, so wouldnt that alter the tuning freq all over again, not to mention considerably reduce the internal volume?




  5. #5
    aeroportspwn's Avatar
    aeroportspwn is offline mmmm aeroports



    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    335
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Some people say the RE box calculator is not accurate but just use the re box calculator it is about 99.9% accurate. All you need to do is subtract the subwoofer displacement yourself after it gives you the box volume and you are good to go. At most after you do that the box tune will only change about .3-.4 higher or so..

    RE Enclosure Calculator

    you can adjust the port width and everything yourself.

    Make sure your box has enough depth for your sub when you have such a long slot port inside. You will need to make it deeper than 10".



    refs on here: bought from PioneerSPL1990, amartin_72, fasfocus00, Kowboy | Sold to evildave101, Louisiana_CRX, KAC1023, Zachfeen, ds0110 | refs on caco: 72impala, super_duper, KAC1023, tandrel | refs on ebay: my username is chevy-guy87


  6. #6
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Is a 2" slot port enough? Or will there be noise




  7. #7
    MONSONwarrior's Avatar
    MONSONwarrior is offline Constantly Rebuilding... MONSONwarrior is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    1,707
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Noise. I can't exactly remember the saying but for a 2.5 cu. ft. box DD says I need 40 cu. in. of port and you have 31



    2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer LT
    Pioneer AVIC-U310BT | Eclipse SC6500 | MB Quart Q4.80
    (2) Fi BTL N2 12 in 4.5 cubes @ 33hz | Cactus K5 | XS D3100 & D3400 | Knu 0 Gauge | Big 3 | 250a Alt


  8. #8
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    The internal volume is around 2.3-2.4

    I am kind of worried because they say 3.0 @ 34 is optimal, but man that creates a peak and is not very flat in freq response. I am so torn between what I am doing....




  9. #9
    MONSONwarrior's Avatar
    MONSONwarrior is offline Constantly Rebuilding... MONSONwarrior is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    1,707
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Quote Originally Posted by way2sl0 View Post
    The internal volume is around 2.3-2.4

    I am kind of worried because they say 3.0 @ 34 is optimal, but man that creates a peak and is not very flat in freq response. I am so torn between what I am doing....
    You're still a tad under then. I would just go by specs, that looks like it'll get loud, yet deep. My DD/AQ design is 2.5 for a 12 and at 38 hz, so 2.4 is pretty small for a 15 and 31 cu. in. of port is kinda narrow. What are your size constraints?



    2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer LT
    Pioneer AVIC-U310BT | Eclipse SC6500 | MB Quart Q4.80
    (2) Fi BTL N2 12 in 4.5 cubes @ 33hz | Cactus K5 | XS D3100 & D3400 | Knu 0 Gauge | Big 3 | 250a Alt


  10. Thanks way2sl0 thanked for this post
  11. #10
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Ill take some measurements and get back to this thread this afternoon, thanks for your help :-)




  12. #11
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Ok so I have...
    33" wide, 16.1" high, and 12" deep of space. Thats it.

    Its interesting because TBH like I said id rather use ALOT less then that...and its heavy...
    How much output would I lose using 1/2 or 5'8ths MDF instead of 3/4?




  13. #12
    aeroportspwn's Avatar
    aeroportspwn is offline mmmm aeroports



    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    335
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    trust me stick with 3/4" mdf do not go smaller.



    refs on here: bought from PioneerSPL1990, amartin_72, fasfocus00, Kowboy | Sold to evildave101, Louisiana_CRX, KAC1023, Zachfeen, ds0110 | refs on caco: 72impala, super_duper, KAC1023, tandrel | refs on ebay: my username is chevy-guy87


  14. #13
    MONSONwarrior's Avatar
    MONSONwarrior is offline Constantly Rebuilding... MONSONwarrior is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    1,707
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Quote Originally Posted by way2sl0 View Post
    Ok so I have...
    33" wide, 16.1" high, and 12" deep of space. Thats it.

    Its interesting because TBH like I said id rather use ALOT less then that...and its heavy...
    How much output would I lose using 1/2 or 5'8ths MDF instead of 3/4?
    That's only 2.78 cubes so you're gonna be on the small side... Then you add port displacement and driver and you're in a tiny box... My driver, bracing, and port displacement was around .6 cubes so 2 is really low for your sub..



    2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer LT
    Pioneer AVIC-U310BT | Eclipse SC6500 | MB Quart Q4.80
    (2) Fi BTL N2 12 in 4.5 cubes @ 33hz | Cactus K5 | XS D3100 & D3400 | Knu 0 Gauge | Big 3 | 250a Alt


  15. #14
    way2sl0's Avatar
    way2sl0 is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    254
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Well hell then. Are you saying I should just keep it sealed? I mean the Q value of the sub is good for either according to most of the calculators I have used. I don't want to have to give away all my trunk space for a subwoofer setup that is always attenuated on my deck. I mean like I said I just want flat response. The only thing I am worried about I guess is losing alot of efficiency from not going ported. Right now it takes almost no power, even though im giving it double RMS, to get it moving. The voice coil config won't allow me to run my amp at 4 ohms so I can't run it at 400, it has to be 600. I even tried trading my 15 for 2 10's, but I think it would be noticeably quieter.

    I guess bottom line you are saying is, I will be destroying any low end response I would be gaining by using a ported box, if I give it only 2-2.2 cubes? It isnt that far off from RE's 2.5 compact size recommendation.




  16. #15
    MONSONwarrior's Avatar
    MONSONwarrior is offline Constantly Rebuilding... MONSONwarrior is a Supporting Member of the forum!



    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    1,707
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I have to rebuild box, I searched, RE SRx

    Quote Originally Posted by way2sl0 View Post
    Well hell then. Are you saying I should just keep it sealed? I mean the Q value of the sub is good for either according to most of the calculators I have used. I don't want to have to give away all my trunk space for a subwoofer setup that is always attenuated on my deck. I mean like I said I just want flat response. The only thing I am worried about I guess is losing alot of efficiency from not going ported. Right now it takes almost no power, even though im giving it double RMS, to get it moving. The voice coil config won't allow me to run my amp at 4 ohms so I can't run it at 400, it has to be 600. I even tried trading my 15 for 2 10's, but I think it would be noticeably quieter.

    I guess bottom line you are saying is, I will be destroying any low end response I would be gaining by using a ported box, if I give it only 2-2.2 cubes? It isnt that far off from RE's 2.5 compact size recommendation.
    Well I lost .6 to a smaller sub and smaller port so you'd be under 2 cubes roughly. I just say stick with what you got or try and go with a beefy 12.



    2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer LT
    Pioneer AVIC-U310BT | Eclipse SC6500 | MB Quart Q4.80
    (2) Fi BTL N2 12 in 4.5 cubes @ 33hz | Cactus K5 | XS D3100 & D3400 | Knu 0 Gauge | Big 3 | 250a Alt


Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. I searched but...
    By Super Pickle in forum Speakers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 08:07 PM
  2. OKay i need an amp...and i've searched and searched..
    By bholtmeier in forum Amplifiers
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-07-2006, 09:35 AM
  3. i searched, how do you dmm an amp to set it up?
    By mikescanlon in forum Wiring, Electrical and Installation Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-17-2005, 07:46 AM
  4. Yes I searched.
    By geonfreaq in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 07-08-2005, 05:48 PM
  5. ho alt and yes i have searched but
    By 1972chevelle in forum Wiring, Electrical and Installation Help
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-06-2005, 08:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum