Closed Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Reload Thread: Sealed box vs. RMS of sub. differences?

  1. #1
    brazilianguy's Avatar
    brazilianguy is offline Senior VIP Member



    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    353
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Sealed box vs. RMS of sub. differences?

    I did some search, and reading and did not find my answer.

    So the question is the difference in sealed enclosure compared to the power of the sub.

    I'm looking into Alpine subs, currently have a Type S, RMS 300W, alpine recommends a 1.25 cu/ft. sealed box.
    And I want to upgrade to the Type R, RMS 500W, and alpine recommends a 0.85 cu/ft. sealed box.

    What I don't understand is how the box play a role here, because what I though would be that if there is more power, then there should be a bigger box, so theres more air to flex.

    But from recommendation, more power, smaller volume

    Can someone explain this concept to me?
    Thank you!







  2. #2
    jdc753's Avatar
    jdc753 is offline Truck Brigade



    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mass
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,891
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sealed box vs. RMS of sub. differences?

    I can't give a very technical explaination but more of a basic, hopefully someone can back me up with some more theory.

    Basically in a sealed application the air inside the box acts as a spring or a shock absorber controlling the travel of the cone. The smaller the volume inside the box the stiffer the spring or shock absorber becomes thus actually requiring more power to maintain the same amount of movement. With a bigger box the spring is "weaker" and so it takes less power to push the cone out of control.



    2005 F350 crew cab diesel 4x4
    -Work in Progress-
    HU: Alpine 9887 linked to 10.4" TS TruckPC
    Front Stage: Polk SR6500 Active
    Front Amp: Sundown Sax100.4
    Sub: Stereo Integrity Magnum V4 in the center console
    Sub amp: Sundown Saz-1500D

    Refs: low_end, Relax, SSon22s, Johnson, tyroneshoes, twisztdpunisher, flakko, djhn9, KINGDELL91, amoffitt, Justin89T, 01 S 10, Mazzasec

  3. #3
    brazilianguy's Avatar
    brazilianguy is offline Senior VIP Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    353
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sealed box vs. RMS of sub. differences?

    Well if you put a lot of power into a bigger box, wouldnt that make the "spring" force flex more? and that causing to have a louder pound to it?




  4. #4
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Sealed box vs. RMS of sub. differences?

    The simple answer here is that you are comparing two different subs, with two different designs and two different enclosure requirements. When cross-comparing models like this, there's really no correlation or connection between RMS power handling and enclosure size.

    When comparing a single subwoofer in different alignments yes, there is going to be a connection between mechanical power handling and enclosure size (larger box, lower mechanical power handling).

    But you are trying to make connections to variables where there are none to be made.




Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
1e2 Forum