Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Reload Thread: cubic foot requirement question

  1. #1
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    cubic foot requirement question

    let me just jump into this one. if a sub specs in at a required volume of .75cu-1.5cu how do you find the "sweet spot?" and, how will sound be effected if the box is built closer to the smaller cubic foot requirement than the larger requirement and vise versa?

    hope I'm making myself clear.







  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH™
    Posts
    15,658
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Yes, there will be a differance, the smaller the box the more it will peak, where as if the box is larger the response will be smoother and LFE will be better.

    (I like big boxes personally...)
    What speaker are we talking about exactly?



    Caraudio.com - Where the average member couldn't wire a SPST toggle if they had to.


    More proof.
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_as View Post
    I need a program or something that will help me find mounting depth without having to build box and such...
    No, Andy, I'm sure the context is fine.

  3. #3
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by UndercoverPunk
    Yes, there will be a differance, the smaller the box the more it will peak, where as if the box is larger the response will be smoother and LFE will be better.

    (I like big boxes personally...)
    What speaker are we talking about exactly?

    JL 10w6

    what exactly do you mean by peak, smoother and LFE. I'm new to this stuff.




  4. #4
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    I'm not quite sure if those are the correct cu.foot requirements for that speaker. I just threw those numbers in there as an example.




  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH™
    Posts
    15,658
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by projectPONY
    JL 10w6

    what exactly do you mean by peak, smoother and LFE. I'm new to this stuff.
    Peaky response is exactly how it sounds there will be a noticable tone that is louder than all the others...

    Smoother response is where all of the frequencies will be more even in volume.

    LFE = Low Frequency Extension.



    Caraudio.com - Where the average member couldn't wire a SPST toggle if they had to.


    More proof.
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_as View Post
    I need a program or something that will help me find mounting depth without having to build box and such...
    No, Andy, I'm sure the context is fine.

  6. #6
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by projectPONY
    JL 10w6

    what exactly do you mean by peak, smoother and LFE. I'm new to this stuff.
    Peak = a "peak" in the frequency response. A certain frequency (or group of frequencies) will be much louder than the frequencies above and below them:



    See the gray, purple and red lines? They have "peaks" in the frequency response. They are good for obtaining more "peak" output, but bad for smooth response (optimally smooth [flat] response would be the black line).



    LFE = low frequency extension. How much output the subwoofer has as the frequency decreases.


    Larger enclosure = lower Qtc, which means flatter frequency response, better "transient" response, better low frequency extension, less overall output and better efficiency.

    Smaller enclosure = higher Qtc, which means peaky frequency response, worsened transient response, worsened low frequency extension, more overall output and worse efficiency.

    Just need to decide which box better fits your tastes. Smaller box is more for obtaining higher output, larger box is aimed more for sound quality type installs or where power is limited.




  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dayton, OH™
    Posts
    15,658
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by squeak9798
    Peak = a "peak" in the frequency response. A certain frequency (or group of frequencies) will be much louder than the frequencies above and below them:



    See the gray, purple and red lines? They have "peaks" in the frequency response. They are good for obtaining more "peak" output, but bad for smooth response (optimally smooth [flat] response would be the black line).



    LFE = low frequency extension. How much output the subwoofer has as the frequency decreases.


    Larger enclosure = lower Qtc, which means flatter frequency response, better "transient" response, better low frequency extension, less overall output and better efficiency.

    Smaller enclosure = higher Qtc, which means peaky frequency response, worsened transient response, worsened low frequency extension, more overall output and worse efficiency.

    Just need to decide which box better fits your tastes. Smaller box is more for obtaining higher output, larger box is aimed more for sound quality type installs or where power is limited.

    sure if you wanna get all fancy and have pics on hand...



    Caraudio.com - Where the average member couldn't wire a SPST toggle if they had to.


    More proof.
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_as View Post
    I need a program or something that will help me find mounting depth without having to build box and such...
    No, Andy, I'm sure the context is fine.

  8. #8
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by UndercoverPunk
    sure if you wanna get all fancy and have pics on hand...
    Internet resources > j00




  9. #9
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    ok, I understand. so.....if I'm looking for more sound quality out of the sub I go with a size of box more towards the larger requirement. if I'm looking for sheer loudness would need to go with a smaller box. is this correct??




  10. #10
    squeak9798's Avatar
    squeak9798 is offline Banned



    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,300
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Pretty much, yes.




  11. #11
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    very well. thanks fellas.




  12. #12
    VOA_NIGHTMARE's Avatar
    VOA_NIGHTMARE is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    upstate ny
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    with that sub though if you did a box 1.25 i think you will be more than happy with it all around i had 2 12w6v2's and had them in a 1.25 and they were amazing i wish the box was just alittle larger and I would of loved to see how they would of been. But for the one 10 1.25 I personaly think would be a great area to keep it in, you should get good lows out of it and have it still be very well all around.

    1.25 per sub i ment




  13. #13
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    great, thanks. glad to hear from someone with personal experience with the w6's.




  14. #14
    projectPONY's Avatar
    projectPONY is offline Junior Member

    Threadstarter


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    ok, next questions, hope you guys don't mind.

    the 10w6 has a top mount depth of 6.9" so, if I mount the sub directly onto the front baffle can the rear baffle be.......let say, 7.5" from the rear of the sub? will this effect sound in any way?

    oh, incase you guys are wondering. I'm wanting to build a box for a truck.




  15. #15
    VOA_NIGHTMARE's Avatar
    VOA_NIGHTMARE is offline CarAudio.com Veteran



    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    upstate ny
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: cubic foot requirement question

    Quote Originally Posted by projectPONY
    great, thanks. glad to hear from someone with personal experience with the w6's.

    I have had 4 12w6v2's total. And to me so far there one of the best subs out for my personal taste.



    Ref List........seth350 REq mabel4life foreman ThumpInDaTrunk DOHCrazy bigwheel15 Naxis2k1 Gaffney982 Exploder 97 kustyn727 Termlab its_bacon12 Ecko072Unltd Nikuk nikosbuddy dbman150 cardinalsfan jeremyzach

    jester7500 BUMPING150S JackFrost Mark Garcia PDizzle2oo5 valeech Raven KngOfThePkngLot thunder9500 apw122 Niggz89 springy101 Viper118 _DjScrew_ PepsiFiend69 diatribe XtrmAudioCncpts raven2201 slick rick bjfish11 wj94
    diatribe

Closed Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Cubic Feet?
    By Colt9699 in forum Subwoofers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-27-2005, 04:34 PM
  2. cubic feet question
    By Geezersoup in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-21-2005, 01:42 PM
  3. Dimension (shape) question....
    By hawk45 in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-01-2005, 01:15 PM
  4. REALLY BIG box question
    By spydyplayer in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-02-2004, 07:03 PM
  5. sealed box question for e12k
    By eWRXshun in forum Enclosure Design & Construction Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-25-2004, 02:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts

1e2 Forum