my pic in my sig is gone now. what i wanna kno is how is one of the stipulations of the rules to enter is against most of the forums rules? and why arent all sigs with "audio company names" banned or removed. nobody said anything when i had DD or cadence and beyma in my sig but now that it was alphadamp oh NOWWWWW its a problem. people wanna brag about what they have and thats what sigs are for. some users on here i only kno because of their sig.
Here is how things should be: No links to third party companies in your sig. This means no "www.*****.com", no clickable thumbnails, etc. that point directly towards a third party company. An indirect connection would be allowed, say a link to a video of your system, where somewhere in that link is another link to a given third party company. Malleability of said exclusion would be at the discretion of the moderators.
Mods, do you agree?
ANT: I apologize for the partial thread jack. I think we both understand that it is for the potential positive outcome of what you were seeking when you made this thread.
im def stealing most of your sig lol thanks bro.
Its right there in the rules people...
When you just stick a few images in your sig like you have done its more or less advertising that product.
I dont know how to explain it more in depth but its clear to see you're posting images as to advertise the alpha damp and just putting the amp in there to prove a point.
I've not once seen someone put an add banner for each little product they're running, you just see them name it off.
I guess what I'm sayin is if you had everything of your system listed and you wanted to list it out say like this
front stage: ;kjdf;lkj
sound deadner: alpha damp
then yeah you could get away with that. But you're just trying to bend the rules as much as you can.
In other words, the assumption that Alphadamp in my banner is a form of advertising relative to this thread is just that, an assumption. And as we know, "To assume makes an ass out of u and me". If I cannot post a picture relative to a product that I may/may not like that doesn't contain a hyperlink or a static link, then NOBODY should be allowed to.
I'm only making a point, hopefully one that the mods understand not as rebellious. There is a evident flaw in the moderation of signatures at the moment, I'm hoping that they notice it and either change the rules so what they are doing is just or leave our signatures alone. The mods aren't perfect, I'm not insulting their intelligence (and I'm not pointing fingers at any certain moderator, period). Everyone makes mistakes.
Btw, I made a ninja edit in my previous post that I'm guessing you missed. I didn't change what I wrote, just added some things.
Idk, a lot of fishy things have been going on with our mods. One being where one of them changed coma's post count more than likely just to get under his skin. As little as it may be, it kind of bothered me, especially from this site. And if you question any of them they just shrug it off and say they dont know who did it and cant tell so no one will have to take blame.
Albeit not as fast as the others, but this site is bringing up bad karma more and more every day.