I guess that is my point. I am willing to provide ANY detail, down to who I am, and a 10 year track record of honest, positive transactions. It appears to me that Kang is not willing to do the same, in any way. I will go to any length on this. I believe in honorable dealings, and not only do I feel that I have been wronged in the simple misrepresentation, to then be accused of a 'bait and switch' over something that I could buy three times over is just insulting, and is only supported by a 'pile on the new guy' mentality. What possible other details or materials could you (or anyone) provide in order to prove that this amp came to me in this condition? I have the timeline, all of my PM's, the photographs, (including any that anyone has asked for, including snaps with username, etc). In other words, and I ask all of you this, if the situation were such that YOU were in my position, what precisely would (or could) you do in order to 'prove' where you stood?
I do understand the 'flog the newb' thing. We all do it, to a degree. but I have never, EVER left a forum, or even been accused of anything that would cause me to leave any other forum over something like this. I am a bit flabbergasted, really. I am not out to screw anyone, ever. I have answered, and will answer, anything at all asked of me in this matter. It doesn't seem that the other players here are willing to do the same. That in itself says...something, does it not?