View Full Version : 9827 vs. 9847
02-25-2005, 09:28 PM
Besides the fact that the 9847 is replacing the 9827, what differences are there between the two. I keep hearing about the internal crossovers that they don't have but my speakers alrady have crossovers so would I even need the internal one? Which would you recommend? I already tried the search but couldn't find the answers I was looking for.
02-26-2005, 01:27 AM
If your components are running off amps(with crossovers) an second crossover is not necessary for the HU... Except for levels of the music on the fly. My HU has a really nice crossover and EQ options and i like it. It allows me to go BASS ASSAULT when needed and MELLOW out all in a matter of seconds. Im not sure what the differences in those two models are but I would personally get the unit with teh crossover. But if you have stuff running off amps your really don't need the Crossover
02-26-2005, 01:54 AM
Yup, my speakers will be running off of an amp and they have external crossovers. Except for my 3.5s up front. They will be ran off of the HU.
02-26-2005, 03:15 PM
Ok then the HU crossover would be helpful for those speakers. I would get the one with the crossover
02-26-2005, 05:21 PM
If I am correct none of these have the internal xovers right? Would it be worth the extra money to upgrade to next one that has them just for 3.5s? If so, I am guessing the next one up is the 9830.
02-27-2005, 08:27 PM
Anyone? Need help as I will be buying in the next week or two.