PDA

View Full Version : 60 Mil Deadener Review



pieper88
12-11-2012, 04:00 PM
So, I won 40 sq from Coleman in the giveaway. I've got around 175 fee of the old style in my Escape already.

Sample of the use of the old stuff

http://i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae177/pieper88_photo/20121210_152749.jpg

http://i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae177/pieper88_photo/CIMG0961.jpg

http://i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae177/pieper88_photo/CIMG0873.jpg


So you can see I really enjoyed the old stuff

How did I like the new stuff? Well, Its making me wished I waited to buy ALL my deadner.

Put it to use in pretty the only sparsily deadened area of my car which was the spare tire well.

http://i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae177/pieper88_photo/20121205_160658.jpg

All in all. I'm pretty impressed and wanted to say thanks to Coleman.

Julian
12-11-2012, 04:01 PM
All of that deadner is so unnecessary

pieper88
12-11-2012, 04:05 PM
All of that deadner is so unnecessary

Thanks!

jockhater2
12-11-2012, 04:09 PM
I don't see how all that deadener is unnecessary

bhsdriller
12-11-2012, 04:11 PM
I don't see how all that deadener is unnecessary


he's trying to start an argument....secondskin says that only like 50% coverage is good enough. Any more on top of that and you're just deadening the deadener, wasting money etc..

jockhater2
12-11-2012, 05:03 PM
he's trying to start an argument....secondskin says that only like 50% coverage is good enough. Any more on top of that and you're just deadening the deadener, wasting money etc..

Oh. well I didn't know that.
I thought the most important areas were just were the metal flexes. like typically the roof?
am I right?

cthedinger
12-12-2012, 09:40 AM
All of that deadner is so unnecessary

Please stay out of all the threads in my section. All you ever try to is start drama and arguments. I will be deleting all the comments I see from you in the AT sections from now one.


he's trying to start an argument....secondskin says that only like 50% coverage is good enough. Any more on top of that and you're just deadening the deadener, wasting money etc..

Yes sir. He is always trying to do this with everything that I post and other post in this sections.


Oh. well I didn't know that.
I thought the most important areas were just were the metal flexes. like typically the roof?
am I right?

100% coverage is not needed but by doing 100% coverage you are still going to get better results than 25-75% coverage. I would suggest starting in the center of all panels and then go from there.

Julian
12-12-2012, 09:50 AM
Adding Mass (deadening) is different than adding strength and rigidity.. Coleman, you sir are an idiot. I guess 100% coverage... is good for him, but there are much better alternatives (that are indeed cheaper) than adding 3-4 layers to a single panel. Usually I don't deaden anything with hard angles because they are more rigid than say a large panel. We've done 1-2 layers of fiberglass on large panels (Such as the roof) to keep it from flexing completely, it works great and its cheap.
I'll start **** in the thunderdome if you want to delete critiscism. Are you and Kevin at SKAM becoming bestfriends?