PDA

View Full Version : Gonna be.......



Moble Enclosurs
07-13-2012, 11:03 AM
Gone until the 24th. Any questions or concerns about design work can be sent to my email at [email protected] if interested in a design or need an answer about something on the forum where I may be linked to.
Any current designs/builds being worked on will be finished before I leave. So if you have a purchase already, don't worry, it will be completed before the 18th at the latest.

Don't forget to check out FB for current information and updates on builds/logs/pics/etc. And like it for updates! Link is in my signature :D

Thanks guys!

05trailblazer
07-13-2012, 12:08 PM
:( you will be mised

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 05:54 PM
Ok Guys, I am back.

Fiendstolemyamp
07-27-2012, 06:17 PM
Welcome back

05trailblazer
07-27-2012, 06:34 PM
yay hey by monday i should have all the pics of my enclosure and some vids too since i just got all the subs :)

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 08:22 PM
yay hey by monday i should have all the pics of my enclosure and some vids too since i just got all the subs :)

Sweet man! Send em over and Ill put em up asap :D Thanks for the update!

cyn
07-27-2012, 08:27 PM
Hey man... Do you think a RE Audio HC 12" would do good in a 6th order ?

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 08:29 PM
Hey man... Do you think a RE Audio HC 12" would do good in a 6th order ?

Is it the 2002 version?

cyn
07-27-2012, 08:39 PM
Is it the 2002 version?

Its either the 2002 or 2003 one

murph
07-27-2012, 08:46 PM
Will be posting a video soon of my sub in the box you made.

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 08:51 PM
Will be posting a video soon of my sub in the box you made.

Wonderful! How does it sound?

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 08:54 PM
Its either the 2002 or 2003 one

The 2003 version based on the recent specs that you had posted on here says that you can get a decent response from it. It will likely have better transience in the lower end but with less output than the higher tuning port with worse transience, making it an overall great average 6th order conventional setup. Obviously, being a 6th order, many many calculations would need to go into it, but from my excel sheets, it shows that it can be done with this sub, yes. Maybe a 4th will give better output though.....I noticed some good qualities of a 4th in the figures, but not sure of the optimal tuning as of yet with general figures done only. But overall, yes it will work in a 6th. May not be the best option, but that depends on your goals also, as we all know. :D Hope that helps!

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 08:56 PM
Its either the 2002 or 2003 one

Also, this is with my own calculated xmax and Le variables. This can change the design layout as well and can make or break the decision of a 6th order, so the actual measured xmax and Le variables will likely be needed for a more accurate idea. Just so you know.

murph
07-27-2012, 08:57 PM
Wonderful! How does it sound?

Really good on low end response and on rock music. The punch in electronic music isn't so impressive though. The box really impressed me on output for it being a 12 on 500 watts. The box is very sensitive to clipping and on some songs (known for having clipping) the volume needs to be turned down.

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 09:01 PM
Really good on low end response and on rock music. The punch in electronic music isn't so impressive though. The box really impressed me on output for it being a 12 on 500 watts. The box is very sensitive to clipping and on some songs (known for having clipping) the volume needs to be turned down.

Sweet! Thanks for the review! yea, with a limited BW in sub frequencies to maintain usable output phase is only around 1.5 octaves at most with certain dimensional limitations that we have to work with, but overall it sounds like it worked out :D. And it is sensitive due to the high efficiency and less need for more power :D. SO that is actually a good thing for you. Now just get some songs that dont clip! lol j/k. Thanks again for the review man!

cyn
07-27-2012, 09:06 PM
Also, this is with my own calculated xmax and Le variables. This can change the design layout as well and can make or break the decision of a 6th order, so the actual measured xmax and Le variables will likely be needed for a more accurate idea. Just so you know.

Yeah I tried to get the rest of the information but could not get it as Gregg only kept a few limited specs on all the subs USAmps and Re Audio had pre 05

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 09:09 PM
Yeah I tried to get the rest of the information but could not get it as Gregg only kept a few limited specs on all the subs USAmps and Re Audio had pre 05

Yea, I seen that. But for what we have it does look to work, so that is good. At least we had the mechanical specs and resistance values lol. I hope that was able to help you :D

murph
07-27-2012, 09:26 PM
Sweet! Thanks for the review! yea, with a limited BW in sub frequencies to maintain usable output phase is only around 1.5 octaves at most with certain dimensional limitations that we have to work with, but overall it sounds like it worked out :D. And it is sensitive due to the high efficiency and less need for more power :D. SO that is actually a good thing for you. Now just get some songs that dont clip! lol j/k. Thanks again for the review man!

The sub is ridiculously efficient, I mean the cone ways nearly nothing. The box has a sweet spot of frequencies from 28-38hz.

Moble Enclosurs
07-27-2012, 09:32 PM
The sub is ridiculously efficient, I mean the cone ways nearly nothing. The box has a sweet spot of frequencies from 28-38hz.

lol nice. Yea as you see in the response you received, the highest output is in that range. The bump at around the 70Hz range is based on resonance mainly, and that changes with positioning and the fact that it is higher in frequency range. Good deal.