PDA

View Full Version : Why do they temp me?



hornedfrog1985
02-12-2009, 10:06 PM
http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/903423

I am pondering on dumping money on this tomorrow... Gah, it's payday but I really shouldn't :( Maybe I should? lol

http://www.shopbiglots.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3340830&jsessionid=6TsLJMfGQ9vP6vTGpXND0Q9hYxjLT0JHvwZhSM4 vPbt5PzPhHbhT!-1789165638&view=all&cp=3314980 <<< It's only a grand tomorrow only...

Beat_Dominator
02-12-2009, 10:07 PM
Dooooo it :evil:

MmatsDude
02-12-2009, 10:10 PM
nice,

96MaxGLE
02-12-2009, 10:17 PM
****...nice deal

shaneb
02-12-2009, 10:19 PM
Sharp is actually rated at one of the top quality LCD's

hornedfrog1985
02-12-2009, 10:50 PM
Yeah, this is a pretty nice tv. It has good specs.

fasfocus00
02-12-2009, 11:59 PM
Yeah, this is a pretty nice tv. It has good specs.

are we looking at the same TV contast ration is 10k dynamic. you could get a Sony W-series for that on sale at best buy. go plasma for $1200 you can get a 50" Panasonic with 1million:1 contrast and a 480hz refresh rate.

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 02:03 AM
^lol You're the guy they **** every dime out of by doubling the refresh rate every month, and getting you to buy into it. They just came out with 120hz, haven't even really sold many 240hz, and you are over hear championing 480 ****ing hz? Get a life bro.

fasfocus00
02-13-2009, 04:56 AM
^lol You're the guy they **** every dime out of by doubling the refresh rate every month, and getting you to buy into it. They just came out with 120hz, haven't even really sold many 240hz, and you are over hear championing 480 ****ing hz? Get a life bro.

next time before you speak, learn something. 120hz is the highest for LCD. if you would actually read what I said, you would see I said plasma. Plasma has had a much higher refresh rate than LCD since the technology first came out. as for 240hz that is not in the mainstream market right now. here's a link for you to see the 480hz

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8723232&type=product&id=1200703056434

p.s - I have a life and a brain. and the 120hz that is not new technology. sony had those on their XBR3 which is almost 3 years old.

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 11:30 AM
WOW who gives a ****? You are one of those people who come over and bash someones tv because you claim you can see a huge difference and would have spent a grand more for 240hz, or something. Get a life. If this was such a bad deal like you seem to imply why did it sell out in the first hour?

jco1385
02-13-2009, 11:32 AM
because people dont know wtf they re doing. they buy what they want

chriswho
02-13-2009, 11:34 AM
man thats the same tv i got and its ****ing bad a** i havent had any probs wit it

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 11:38 AM
You say 120hz is the highest for lcd... Wrong. I did see you said plasma, but there is a reason people are not buying plasmas, and a reason companies are killing them off. Now go away **** nut

billjones42
02-13-2009, 11:40 AM
i'd buy one if it wasn't sold out. ****.

snb778
02-13-2009, 11:45 AM
WOW who gives a ****? You are one of those people who come over and bash someones tv because you claim you can see a huge difference and would have spent a grand more for 240hz, or something. Get a life. If this was such a bad deal like you seem to imply why did it sell out in the first hour?

actually refresh rate is pretty important... i'll give him that. AND it is pretty noticeable when its that big of a difference

fasfocus00
02-13-2009, 12:12 PM
You say 120hz is the highest for lcd... Wrong. I did see you said plasma, but there is a reason people are not buying plasmas, and a reason companies are killing them off. Now go away **** nut

i'd be more than happy for you to show me an LCD tv that refreshes faster than 120hz that the general public can buy but you wont b/c you don't know what you're talking about. people aren't buying plasma's b/c most ppl think that burn in is still a common occurance on them. plasma's got such a bad image from years ago that companies like Pioneer and Panasonic, that have made burn in almost non-exsistant, still deal with morons like you. go ask any with a brain what tv gives the best picture and everyone will tell you that the Pioneer Elite Plasma has the best picture. plasma tv's handle motion better, are more true to color, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles. the only reason to get a LCD over a plasma is b/c you have a ***** load of windows in the room b/c plamsas and the high end samsungs use a high gloss screen.

maybe you should go to a real a/v place and learn something b/c trying to tell someone about stuff you have no clue about. ask them about what makes the difference in picture quality. maybe you could shut your mouth for a few minutes and learn something.

also i never said it was a bad deal. i was just saying that you'd be better off spending a little more and getting a plasma but you had to go off and start slamming someone.

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 12:17 PM
OMG THEY SELL THEM AT 240HZ dumb ****. I don't even bother reading your posts anymore. Here is a review of your coveted 240hz, and notice the price tag. Seems really worth it.

http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-52xbr7/4505-6482_7-33240836.html

Bottom line it's a waste of money. The deal I posted was a good use of money.

Guess what? They sell it to the general public.

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 12:30 PM
Look at the rave reviews owners give it lawl.

juniorab
02-13-2009, 01:39 PM
^lol You're the guy they **** every dime out of by doubling the refresh rate every month, and getting you to buy into it. They just came out with 120hz, haven't even really sold many 240hz, and you are over hear championing 480 ****ing hz? Get a life bro.


WOW who gives a ****? You are one of those people who come over and bash someones tv because you claim you can see a huge difference and would have spent a grand more for 240hz, or something. Get a life. If this was such a bad deal like you seem to imply why did it sell out in the first hour?

Actually, if I'm not mistakem fasfocus is actually a rep for Sony. I'm not a big Sony fan (sorry fasfocus), but I do know that the Sony techs and reps go through intensive training, and do know what they are talking about.

juniorab
02-13-2009, 01:47 PM
people aren't buying plasma's b/c most ppl think that burn in is still a common occurance on them. plasma's got such a bad image from years ago that companies like Pioneer and Panasonic, that have made burn in almost non-exsistant, still deal with morons like you. go ask any with a brain what tv gives the best picture and everyone will tell you that the Pioneer Elite Plasma has the best picture. plasma tv's handle motion better, are more true to color, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles. the only reason to get a LCD over a plasma is b/c you have a ***** load of windows in the room b/c plamsas and the high end samsungs use a high gloss screen.


Totally agree, except that Runco has the best picture, Pioneer Elite, a close second.;)

fasfocus00
02-13-2009, 02:33 PM
Actually, if I'm not mistakem fasfocus is actually a rep for Sony. I'm not a big Sony fan (sorry fasfocus), but I do know that the Sony techs and reps go through intensive training, and do know what they are talking about.

i'm not a Sony fan at all for any of their stuff (their hi-end camcorders are okay). they just pay good. I think that all the XBRs are a big waste of money.


Totally agree, except that Runco has the best picture, Pioneer Elite, a close second.;)

slipped my mind about them. just thinking about what is easily available to most ppl. I don't have a Runco dealer/retailer local.


OMG THEY SELL THEM AT 240HZ dumb ****. I don't even bother reading your posts anymore. Here is a review of your coveted 240hz, and notice the price tag. Seems really worth it.

http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-52xbr7/4505-6482_7-33240836.html

Bottom line it's a waste of money. The deal I posted was a good use of money.

Guess what? They sell it to the general public.

yeah the XBR7 does have 240hz but no one keeps them readily instock b/c their is not difference in picture with the XBR6. the only reason ppl would waste their money on an XBR7 is to get the 70" that is offered in that model. I have no idea what your problem is with buying that tv, i just gave a recommendation about a better buy for you. instead of just taking it as a little freindly help, you decide be a douche about it. ask around some about tv's, almost all if not all real HT enthusiast take a plasma over LCD any day of the week. again not saying that the Sharp wasn't a good buy, just that if you wanted to spend a "little" bit more you could get a better tv.

hornedfrog1985
02-13-2009, 02:38 PM
lol you came in here to pick a fight, pure and simple. Thanks for your friendly help.

Look at your first post, it was made just to say the deal wasn't good.