PDA

View Full Version : rainbow SAC 265.25



ejschultz
11-10-2008, 01:11 PM
What does everybody think of these? I'll be putting 70W RMS into them. The min is 50W RMS and the max RMS is 100W.

SQPL
12-11-2008, 10:59 PM
bump...

any feedback on this components?

redcalimp5
12-12-2008, 01:32 PM
Rainbows are usually underrated. You should be able to give that set 100w rms without a problem. They're very well-built components.

goodrich
12-12-2008, 01:41 PM
270w going to each of my profi's

Hoodlum007
12-12-2008, 06:17 PM
That will be fine on those speakers.

SQPL
12-12-2008, 10:14 PM
how does the SAC 265.25 compare with Hertz HSK165 in SQ?

carguy83
12-12-2008, 10:25 PM
how does the SAC 265.25 compare with Hertz HSK165 in SQ?

I prefer the Cal25 silk domes that comes with the 265.25's over the HSK's. IMO they are much smoother than the HSK tweet without being harsh in any way. The midbass is pretty decent too and can drop fairly low. The HSK's midbass seems a tiny bit more punchy. I have pretty extensive experience with both, and would pick the Rainbow over the Hertz.

SQPL
12-12-2008, 10:55 PM
I prefer the Cal25 silk domes that comes with the 265.25's over the HSK's. IMO they are much smoother than the HSK tweet without being harsh in any way. The midbass is pretty decent too and can drop fairly low. The HSK's midbass seems a tiny bit more punchy. I have pretty extensive experience with both, and would pick the Rainbow over the Hertz.

What's the difference between the SAC 265.25 & SAC 465.25?

WhoSayWho?
12-13-2008, 09:40 AM
What's the difference between the SAC 265.25 & SAC 465.25?

That first number usually tells you whether the set is a two way (265) or three way (365). I did not know there was a 465.

SQPL
12-16-2008, 04:33 PM
Got it.. the 465.25 has two woofers. :D


I wonder how does the SAC 265.25 compare with the AQG6.5. They are both German made.