PDA

View Full Version : Would it be bad to mount the tweet in this spot?



bamaboy
11-12-2006, 05:18 PM
just wondering since this is the same vehicle as mine, just thinking on where i could mount a tweet
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c108/jayblastr/system/SL603.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c108/jayblastr/system/SL604.jpg

azbass
11-12-2006, 05:24 PM
do you have time alignment or can you delay em etc. ?

skmfkr
11-12-2006, 05:24 PM
why not on the A pillar, thats where i would do it, i think it would get annoying listening to with it the doors opening a closing. plus it seems kinda low

MBrock4u
11-12-2006, 05:25 PM
That looks nice. Shoots right at you. I have mine shooting a little higher but I would think that would sound good as is.

Prowler573
11-12-2006, 05:26 PM
do you have time alignment or can you delay em etc. ?

Good question.
Without some sort of processing there your imaging is going to be, well, nonexistant for the most part. You'd have the output from the left tweet screaming into your ear and the output from the right tweet all but inaudible without something to take up the slack there :crap:

traksta15
11-12-2006, 05:27 PM
aren't they supposed to point at the opposite driver's head?? I think im mistaken though..........

azbass
11-12-2006, 05:28 PM
they will probably be too bright..

j3bus2k3
11-12-2006, 05:29 PM
I'm about to get installing in my girls '94 explorer and I'm facing the same questions. I've decided to take off the a-pillar and glass pods for the tweet facing opposite sides, depending on how they sound...

HitManSE
11-12-2006, 05:31 PM
So long as its a soft dome (on axis) type tweeter & aimed at you I dont see a problem. I dont see the doors opening & closing a problem either. Its not like your driving around with your doors open anyway.

traksta15
11-12-2006, 05:48 PM
if you're worried about opening and closing your doors affecting the sound then why mount comps in the doors?

bamaboy
11-12-2006, 05:57 PM
the tweet is going to be hard material probably boston pro set, HU has no time align ment or anything like that

bamaboy
11-12-2006, 05:59 PM
some of you probably care more about imaging than i do, ive got a pair of MT's to attempt to over come

HitManSE
11-12-2006, 06:02 PM
the tweet is going to be hard material probably boston pro set, HU has no time align ment or anything like that

Id consider mounting somewere else then. Hard meterial tweets (Off axis) aimed directly at you will be way too bright. I would definetly have them pointed away, like the windsheild center.

Towncar
11-12-2006, 06:03 PM
the tweet is going to be hard material probably boston pro set, HU has no time align ment or anything like that

Get double sided tape, or velcro, and temporally mount the tweeter, and choose which location you like your tweeter at. Thats the best solution.

bamaboy
11-12-2006, 06:29 PM
Get double sided tape, or velcro, and temporally mount the tweeter, and choose which location you like your tweeter at. Thats the best solution.

yea im going to try this anyway

ngsm13
11-12-2006, 06:33 PM
Yup... I'd test listen to them in that location for a few days. Then decide myself.

nG

azbass
11-12-2006, 06:35 PM
yup

jmanpc
11-12-2006, 06:35 PM
i had em about there in my old exploder and loved it.

ngsm13
11-12-2006, 06:38 PM
i had em about there in my old exploder and loved it.

Then again, you know nothing about true Sound Quality or imaging. :( ;)

nG

bamaboy
11-12-2006, 06:42 PM
Then again, you know nothing about true Sound Quality or imaging. :( ;)

nG

pwnt?

jmanpc
11-12-2006, 06:48 PM
Then again, you know nothing about true Sound Quality or imaging. :( ;)

nG

Because we all know MBQ's sound quality is terrible.

... and what you just said sound like something some arrogant noob would say. You never heard the Explorer. Did it have perfect imaging? No. But have I heard cars with proper imaging and staging? Yes, plenty. I know plenty about sound quality and imaging, and while the Explorer wasn't the best I'd ever heard, the imaging and SQ weren't bad at all.

9512ds
11-12-2006, 06:48 PM
Because we all know MBQ's sound quality is terrible.

... and what you just said sound like something some arrogant noob would say. You never heard the Explorer. Did it have perfect imaging? No. But have I heard cars with proper imaging and staging? Yes, plenty. I know plenty about sound quality and imaging, and while the Explorer wasn't the best I'd ever heard, the imaging and SQ weren't bad at all.

sarcasm with the wink smiley maybe...

ngsm13
11-12-2006, 06:52 PM
Because we all know MBQ's sound quality is terrible.

... and what you just said sound like something some arrogant noob would say. You never heard the Explorer. Did it have perfect imaging? No. But have I heard cars with proper imaging and staging? Yes, plenty. I know plenty about sound quality and imaging, and while the Explorer wasn't the best I'd ever heard, the imaging and SQ weren't bad at all.

Oops... must have poked you in the rib with that one... :uhoh: :laugh: :rolleyes: :crying: :crap:

nG

azbass
11-12-2006, 06:53 PM
oh snap

ibtl!?!?!?!?!

jmanpc
11-12-2006, 06:54 PM
Oops... must have poked you in the rib with that one... :uhoh: :laugh: :rolleyes: :crying: :crap:

nG

teehee