Printable View
Is there really any diffrence between these 2 amps? I noticed the KX is about 150 dollars cheaper. Anyone have expirences with these amps. I know kicker makes good amps just dont understand why they would make these 2 amps if they were the exact same thing
ZX is a higer line of amplifier...
id go with the kx
No, it's just the updated KX line.Quote:
Originally Posted by revrider1
The KX and ZX amps are very similar. I'd opt for the KX for the money.
well, I misworded, higher line newer version...My bad...
kk
both should be pretty good amps
They're supposed to have the same board. However, I've heard that a few components are different.
i loved my old kx's. then again, i love my new zx's.
(not running the 2500.1's tho, was running a kx1200.1 and now a zx1500.1)
correct. few things are newer and better. simply means the zx's are SLIGHTLY more under rated than the kx's..........but when it all comes downt ot he nitty gritty they are pretty muchthe same, and if you are on a budget get the kx's. they're basically the same with minimal real world application differances.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakota
cool cool so in the end they are both quality amps right?>
thats right
From the few models I have looked at, the KX has a 12 db low-pass xover, the ZX has a 24db xover.
The higher order 24db xover may help with the illusion that your bass is actually coming from the front of the car/ the comps, even though the subs are in the rear.
If you have 18 or 24db xovers on your head unit or processor, or run rear mids and highs, this is a non-issue, save your money and buy the KX.