s2k a ricer? haha.
s2k a ricer? haha.
crunktimes . com/ct
And on the topic of ricers, import cars can be done up nicely too.
Just the same way a muscle car can be fully restored into a beautiful classic...
or turned into a piece of redneck trash.
![]()
Refs: Kenny Pollock, ngsm13, rollerdj, WhoSayWho?
Twin turbo fox. Woohoo for poor handling drag queens.
crunktimes . com/ct

and an STI would KILL a pontiac 400 ci motor, its not about displacement AS MUCH anymore, its about technology..

my car isn't poor handling. And the fox you pictures is an ugly gray notch.. i have a 1988 black hatchback black tinted windows 17 roh rims cobra wing.. much nicer than the s2gay
I don't see why a STOCK car can be called ricer.
Just like some people have 4kw on huge subs and stock front speakers, some people like going retardedly fast in a straight line and don't care about cornering.
I dig acceleration more than cornering. I get alot more opportunity to accelerate hard on the street than corner at the edge of a cars limits. Cornering at the edge of a cars limits on the street can end up very bad as well...almost had that bite me in the ass once![]()
i would take one of these over any of those little pop cans you guys are posting up and it isnt any more xpensive
![]()
system:
Sub: 18 inch MJ-18, in a 4.5 cu ft box @ 30 hz
Amp: Profile AP2000 2 ch.
Head unit: Eclipse AVN7000
Big 3: 1/0
Alt: HO
Battery: optima yellow top
forced induction 400 ci vs a 152ci forced induction...which do you think will make more hp...and tq.
Head and valve train technology help, but if your talking about both forced induction...more cubes will win out. The STI would have to make over 2.6 times the hp/ci to keep up.
what about some trucks on the quarter mile, anyone have any moded ones or know of any that can get in the 11-12 second range or faster?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)