TANG BAND 10" NEO SUBWOOFER matches ED sq10 pricing.

[JayRich]

Quote:from BEN on ICIX on 11-15-06
Originally Posted by YladA
I saw in the thread that there would be multiple versions. You said that this was the first prototype correct? And beat that price?!!? Wow I might want a couple..


Yes. Someone flaked on a sample to try and cut us out of our own product.

Yes. We will beat that price and any other price they put on it. And we'll do it with a better product.

We've done development and public development of this product for a year now. That's how we do things to keep consumers informed. Someone else noticed the market for it and is trying to beat us to market with a clone of a old version we've improved upon. That's just part of business

http://www.icixsound.com/vb/showthre...ight=tang+bang

[Randy Savage]

Look at it this way. As far as we know Ben does not have his own buildhouse, he has used others buildhouses since he went into business. He now claims to have this non existant buildehouse and claims tangband, who has their own buildhouse and is an upstanding company, has stolen his design.[/QUOTE]


because other companies have never had screwups and scandals? (i.e. re hc's using onyx motors with a black plastic covers over the label) thing is- ben seems to be an idiot, but they have had no real "issues" with the products in the past couple of years.... and yes, I do know the history- i was around for the whole original 9.1 preorder fiasco, or the original a series (flatcone) problems. Bottom line is this- their stuff is cheap, but it works for what you pay for it.... And ben isnt the only company owner or worker that has been an ass. (tc sounds comes to mind, as well as nate from e.a.)[/QUOTE]

FYI- RE built those for Onyx...they were RE's drivers.

[squeak9798]

Quote:from BEN on ICIX on 11-15-06
Originally Posted by YladA
I saw in the thread that there would be multiple versions. You said that this was the first prototype correct? And beat that price?!!? Wow I might want a couple..


Yes. Someone flaked on a sample to try and cut us out of our own product.

Yes. We will beat that price and any other price they put on it. And we'll do it with a better product.

We've done development and public development of this product for a year now. That's how we do things to keep consumers informed. Someone else noticed the market for it and is trying to beat us to market with a clone of a old version we've improved upon. That's just part of business

http://www.icixsound.com/vb/showthre...ight=tang+bang

What I always find funny is how they always use the "public development" to "prove" that it was their design......when it doesn't prove a thing.

All Ben had to do was post information and pictures on his forum when he received it from TangBand and you have acheived the same result. He talks w/ TangBand and gets an update, hops on the internet and posts it on his forum. "Public Development". TB sends him a proto, he snaps a picture and posts it on his forum. "Public Development".

From what I know....TB has a patent-pending on the design. So, it should be pretty interesting for Mr. Milne in the coming months and years.

[snoopdan]

Uhh, some companies actually DO product development (ie: let people try out subs before they go to market) to test durability.

However, ive never ever heard of anyone demo'ing eD subs. Hell ive never even seen anyone compete with eD equipment ....SPL or SQ

This whole subject isnt new (as snova pointed out with the Onyx mess)... I remember a certain company recently that had similar issues with Maxxonics

[TeoTorriatte]

What I always find funny is how they always use the "public development" to "prove" that it was their design......when it doesn't prove a thing.

All Ben had to do was post information and pictures on his forum when he received it from TangBand and you have acheived the same result. He talks w/ TangBand and gets an update, hops on the internet and posts it on his forum. "Public Development". TB sends him a proto, he snaps a picture and posts it on his forum. "Public Development".

From what I know....TB has a patent-pending on the design. So, it should be pretty interesting for Mr. Milne in the coming months and years.

Bingo. If you follow the 'public development' timeline, you will find that it goes from concept discussed over lunch to working prototype VERY quickly -- especially for a custom tooled neo motor driver.

[Warbleed]

Its amusing that the accusation claims Ben is now getting them built elsewhere if it's totally custom though. So Ben managed to have another buildhouse tool ALL of TB's custom parts? I don't really see how that would be very profitable, given all the tooling costs involved there.

Not saying it isn't true, but at this point it's what ben says vs what dan says that TB said, so it's not like anyone here has "all the facts."

Personally I really don't care either way...

[scrappy]

If ED changed anything on the sub it cant be considered infingement. This stuff happens all the time in car performance parts. Tweek the design a little and now its yours

[TeoTorriatte]

If ED changed anything on the sub it cant be considered infingement. This stuff happens all the time in car performance parts. Tweek the design a little and now its yours

If you look at pics of the production SQ10, it is obvious that there are at least cosmetic changes from the prototype (which is identical to the TB driver). So, if eD owned the tooling, then there would be no need to change the design. TB would have had to change their design.

As Warbleed said, it really is just all speculation at this point. But, this topic never would have come up if it wasn't for Ben's accusations that TB somehow screwed eD out of their own product. Once again, it is the buildhouse's fault.

Incidently, the TB at PE is now back up the old $78 price... so I guess the original point of this thread is no longer valid, eh?

[squeak9798]

If ED changed anything on the sub it cant be considered infingement.

Not entirely true.

Copying patented parts or methods of construction is still patent infringement, even if the driver as a whole is different.

[02parkave]

Look at it this way. As far as we know Ben does not have his own buildhouse, he has used others buildhouses since he went into business. He now claims to have this non existant buildehouse and claims tangband, who has their own buildhouse and is an upstanding company, has stolen his design.

because other companies have never had screwups and scandals? (i.e. re hc's using onyx motors with a black plastic covers over the label) thing is- ben seems to be an idiot, but they have had no real "issues" with the products in the past couple of years.... and yes, I do know the history- i was around for the whole original 9.1 preorder fiasco, or the original a series (flatcone) problems. Bottom line is this- their stuff is cheap, but it works for what you pay for it.... And ben isnt the only company owner or worker that has been an ass. (tc sounds comes to mind, as well as nate from e.a.)[/QUOTE]

FYI- RE built those for Onyx...they were RE's drivers.


[/QUOTE]

im aware of that.... still a screw-up